Using contingent valuation to enhance public participation in local planning

Regional Studies

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 667-678

  O'Doherty, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Benefit transfer; Contingent valuation; Local Planning; Public participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 5544247554     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343409612331349958     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ALTY R. and DARKE R. (1987) A city centre for people: involving the community in planning for Sheffield's Central Area, Plann. Practice & Research 3, 7-12.
2. ARNSTEIN S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 3, 216-24.
3. ARROW K., SOLOW R., LEAMER E., PORTNEY P., RANDNER R. and SCHUMAN H. (1993) Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, Federal Register 58(10), 15 January, pp. 4,601-14.
4. BATEMAN I. J., LANGFORD I. H., WILLIS K. G., TURNER R. K. and GARROD G. D. (1993) The impacts of changing willingness to pay question format in contingent valuation studies: an analysis of open-ended, iterative bidding and dichotomous choice formats, CSER GE Working Paper GEC 93-05, University College London.
5. BISHOP R. C. and HEBERLAIN T. A. (1979) Measuring values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased?, Am J. Agri. Econ. 61(5), 926-30.
6. BISHOP R. C. and HEBERLAIN T. A. (1986) Does contingent valuation work? in CUMMINGS G., BROOKSHIRE D. S. and SCHULZE W. D. (Eds) Valuing Environmental Goods. Rowman & Allanheld, Totawa, NJ.
7. COLLINS A., NEWLAND P. and RHODES P. (1993) Applying 3-D modelling, interactive media and contingent valuation to understanding cityscape flux and environmental impact, Discussion Paper No. 27, Department of Economics, University of Portsmouth.
8. DAVIDOFF P. and REINER T. A. (1962) A choice theory of planning, J. Am. Inst. Plann. 28.
9. DESVOUSGES W. H., NAUGHTON M. C. and PARSONS G. R. (1992) Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies, Water Resources Research 28(3), 675-83.
10. FISHBEIN M. and AJZEN I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
11. GEDDES P. (1915) Cities in Evolution. Norgate & Norgate, London.
12. HAMMACK J. and BROWN G. M. (1974) Waterfowl and Wetlands: Towards Bioeconomic Analysis. The John Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore.
13. HANLEY N. D. and RUFFELL R. J. (1993) The contingent valuation of forest characteristics: two experiments, J. Agric. Econ. 44(2), 218-29.
14. HEALEY P. and GILROY R. (1990) Towards a people-sensitive planning, Plann. Practice & Research 5(2), 21-29.
15. HOEHN J. P. and RANDALL A. (1987) A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation, J. Environ. Econ. & Mgt. 14, 226-47.
16. KNETSCH J. L. (1989) The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves, Am. Econ. Rev. 79(5), 1,277-84.
17. KNETSCH J. L. (1992) Preferences and nonreversibility of indifference curves, J. Econ. Behav. & Organiz. 17, 131-39.
18. KNETSCH J. L. and SINDEN J. A. (1984) Willing to pay and compensation demanded: experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value, Quart. J. Econ. 94(3), 507-21.
19. MCDANIELS, T. L. (1992) Reference points, loss aversion and contingent values for auto safety, J. of Risk & Uncertainty 5(2), 187-200.
20. MAXWELL S. (1994) Valuation of rural environmental improvements using contingent valuation methodology: a case study of the Marston Vale Community Forest project, J. Environ. Mgt. 41, 385-99.
21. MITCHELL R. C. and CARSON R. T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
22. NORTHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL (1987) Bristol North Fringe Local Plan. Northavon District Council, Thornbury, Bristol.
23. O'DOHERTY R. K. (1993a) Public participation in the development of local plans and the role of contingent valuation, Working Papers in Economics No. 4, University of the West of England, Bristol.
24. O'DOHERTY R. K. (1993b) Using contingent valuation to enhance public participation in local planning: empirical evidence on the value of open space, Working Papers in Economics No. 7, University of the West of England, Bristol.
25. O'RIORDAN T. (1977) Citizen participation in practice: some dilemmas and possible solutions, in SEWELL W. R. and COPPOCK J. T. (Eds) Public Participation in Planning. Wiley, London.
26. RANDALL A. (1991) Total and nonuse values, in BRADEN J. B. and KOLSTAD C. D. (Eds) Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
27. SKEFFINGTON A. M. (1969) People and Planning, Report to the Ministry of Housing and Local Government, the Scottish Development Department and the Welsh Office. HMSO, London.
28. SMITH V. K. (1992) On separating defensible benefit transfers from 'smoke and mirrors', Water Resources Research 28(3), 685-94.
29. WEBSTER B. and LAYERS A. (1991) The effectiveness of public local inquiries as a vehicle for public participation in the plan making process: a case study of the Barnet Unitary Development Plan inquiry, J. Plann. & Environ. Law, 803-13.
30. WHITTINGTON D., SMITH V. K., OKORAFOR A., OKORE A., LIU J. L. and MCPHAIL A. (1992) Giving respondents time to think in contingent valuation studies: a developing country application. J. Environ. Econ. & Mgt. 22, 205-25.