Auditory word perception in sentence context in reading-disabled children

NeuroReport

Volumn 19, Issue 16, 2008, Pages 1567-1571

  Mody, Maria ^a,b,c   Wehner, Daniel T ^a,b   Ahlfors, Seppo P ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Dyslexia; Magnetoencephalography; N400; Phonological mismatch negativity; Reading impairment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CHILD CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SEMANTICS;

ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 55349135229     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328311ca04     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Shaywitz SE, Fletcher JM, Holahan JM, Shneider AE, Marchione KE, Stuebing KK, et al. Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence. Pediatrics 1999; 104:1351-1359.
2. Liberman IY, Shankweiler D, Liberman AM, Fowler C, Fischer FW. Phonetic segmentation and receding in the beginning reader. In: Reber AS, Scarborough D. editors. Toward a psychology of reading: the proceedings of the CUNY Conference. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1977.
3. Mody M, Studdert-Kennedy M, Brady S. Speech perception deficits in poor readers: auditory processing or phonological coding? J Exp Child Psychol 1997; 64:199-231.
4. Nation K, Snowling MJ. Individual differences in contextual facilitation: evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension. Child Dev 1998; 69:996-1011.
5. Stanovich KE, West RF. The effect of sentence context on on-going word recognition: tests of a two-process theory. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1981; 7:658-672.
6. Perfetti CA, Goldman SR, Hogaboam TW. Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Mem Cogn 1979; 7:273-282.
7. Chiappe P, Chiappe DL, Gottardo A. Vocabulary, Context, and Speech Perception Among Good and Poor Readers. Educ Psychol 2004; 24:825-843.
8. Connolly JF, Phillips NA, Stewart SH, Brake WG. Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain Lang 1992; 43:1-18.
9. van den Brink D, Brown CM, Hagoort P. Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13:967-985.
10. Helenius P, Salmelin R, Service E, Connolly JF. Semantic cortical activation in dyslexic readers. J Cogn Neurosci 1999; 11:535-550.
11. Halgren E, Dhond RP, Christensen N, Van Petten C, Marinkovic K, Lewine JD, et al. N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. Neuroimage 2002; 17:1101-1116.
12. Kutas M, Neville HJ, Holcomb PJ. A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening and signing. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1987; 39:325-330.
13. Wehner DT, Ahlfors SP, Mody M. Effects of phonological contrast on auditory word discrimination in children with and without reading disability: a magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45:3251-3262.
14. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 8:272-284.
15. Lin FH, Witzel T, Ahlfors SP, Stufflebeam SM, Belliveau JW, Hämäläinen MS. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates. Neuroimage 2006; 31:160-171.
16. Wehner DT, Ahlfors SP, Mody M. The influence of semantic processing on phonological decisions in children and adults: a magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50: 716-731.
17. Wei Q, Ihara A, Hayakawa T, Murata T, Matsumoto E, Fujimaki N. Phonological influences on lexicosemantic processing of kanji words. Neuroreport 2007; 18:1775-1780.
18. Kujala A, Alho K, Service E, Ilmoniemi RJ, Connolly JF. Activation in the anterior left auditory cortex associated with phonological analysis of speech input: localization of the phonological mismatch negativity response with MEG. Brain Res: Cogn Brain Res 2004; 21: 106-113.
19. Zaehle T, Geiser E, Alter K, Jancke L, Meyer M. Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream. Brain Res 2008; 1220:179-190.
20. Kevan A, Pammer K. Making the link between dorsal stream sensitivity and reading. Neuroreport 2008; 19:467-470.
21. Bonte ML, Blomert L. Developmental dyslexia: ERP correlates of anomalous phonological processing during spoken word recognition. Brain Res: Cog Brain Res 2004; 21:360-376.
22. Sabisch B, Hahne A, Glass E, von Suchodoletz W, Friederici AD. Auditory language comprehension in children with developmental dyslexia: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18:1676-1695.
23. Ceponiene R, Rinne T, Näätänen R. Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials. Clini Neurophysiol 2002; 113:870-882.
24. Takeshita K, Nagamine T, Thuy DH, Satow T, Matsuhashi M, Yamamoto J, et al. Maturational change of parallel auditory processing in schoolaged children revealed by simultaneous recording of magnetic and electric cortical responses. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113:1470-1484.
25. Sharma M, Purdy SC, Newall P, Wheldall K, Beaman R. Refractory effects on auditory-evoked responses in children with reading disorders. Neuroreport 2007; 18:133-136.