Next generation classifiers: Focusing on integration frameworks

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 74, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1178-1180

  Mountrakis, Giorgos ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; REMOTE SENSING; SPACE OPTICS;

CLASSIFICATION PROCESSES; COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS; FREE ACCESSES; IMAGE AVAILABILITIES; INTEGRATED APPROACHES; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORKS; INTEGRATION FRAMEWORKS; LANDSATS; UNIFIED FRAMEWORKS;

CLASSIFIERS;

ALGORITHM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LANDSAT; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 55349130637     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (15)

1. Aires, F., C. Prigent, and W.B. Rossow, 2004. Neural network uncertainty assessment using Bayesian statistics: A remote sensing application. Neural Computation, 16:2415-2458.
2. Alimohammadi, A., H.R., Rabiei, and P.Z. Firouzabadi, 2004. A new approach for modeling uncertainty in remote sensing change detection process, Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Geoinformatics - Geospatial Information Research: Bridging the Pacific and Atlantic, 7-9 June, 2004, University of Gavle, Sweden, pp. 503-508.
3. Breiman, L., 1996. Bagging predictors, Machine Learning, 24(2):123-140.
4. Canters, F., 1997. Evaluating the uncertainty of area estimates derived from fuzzy land-cover classification, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63(4):403-414.
5. Carpenter, G. A., S. Gopal, S. Macomber, S. Martens, C.E. Woodcock, and J. Franklin, 1999. A neural network method for efficient vegetation mapping, Remote Sensing of Environment, 70:326-338.
6. Coe., Stefan E., M. Alberti, J.A. Hepinstall, and R. Coburn, 2005. A Hybrid approach to detecting impervious surface at multiple-scale. Proceedings of the ISPRS WG VIIl/I Human Settlements and Impact Analysis' 3rd International Symposium Remote Sensing and Data Fusion Over Urban Areas (URBAN 2005), 14-16 March 2005, Tempe, AZ.
7. Foody, G.M., N.A. Campbell, N.M. Trodd, and T.F. Wood, 1992. Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from maximum-likelihood classification, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58(9):1335-1341.
8. Hansen, L.K., and P. Salamon, 1990. Neural network ensembles, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12:993-1001.
9. Krogh, A., and J. Vedelsby, 1995. Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning, within Tesauro, G., Touretzky, D., Leen, T., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 7, Cambridge, MA, pp. 238, MIT Press.
10. Liu, W.G., S. Gopal, and C.E. Woodcock, 2004. Uncertainty and confidence in land cover classification using a hybrid classifier approach, Photogrammetric Engineering &. Remote Sensing, 70(8):963-971.
11. Perrone, M., 1992. A soft-competitive splitting rule for adaptive treestructured neural networks, Proceedings of the international Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Baltimore, MD, pp. 689-693.
12. Pontius, R.G., 2000. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(8):1011-1016.
13. Steele, B.M., 2000. Combining multiple classifiers: An application using spatial and remotely sensed information for land cover type mapping, Remote Sensing of Environment, 74:545-556.
14. Steele, B.M., J.C. Winne, and R.L. Redmond, 1998. Estimation and mapping of misclassification probabilities for thematic land cover maps, Remote Sensing of Environment, 66(2):192-202.
15. Wolpert, D.H., 1992. Stacked generalization, Neural Networks, 5:241-259.