Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper

BMC Medical Imaging

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Jensen, Mette Munk ^a,b   Jørgensen, Jesper Tranekjæer ^a,b   Binderup, Tina ^a,b   Kjær, Andreas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL NEOPLASM; EXTERNAL CALIPER; FEMALE; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUDE MOUSE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TUMOR VOLUME; XENOGRAFT; ADENOCARCINOMA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ANIMALS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, NUDE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 55349109633     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-8-16     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Euhus DM Hudd C LaRegina MC Johnson FE Tumor measurement in the nude mouse J Surg Oncol 1986, 31:229-234 10.1002/jso.2930310402 3724177
2. Tomayko MM Reynolds CP Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989, 24:148-154
3. Weber WA Wieder H Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006, 33(Suppl 1):27-37 10.1007/ s00259-006-0133-3
4. Dorow DS Cullinane C Conus N Roselt P Binns D McCarthy TJ McArthur GA Hicks RJ Multi-tracer small animal PET imaging of the tumour response to the novel pan-Erb-B inhibitor CI-1033 Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006, 33;441-452 10.1007/s00259-005-0039-5 16450138
5. Leyton J Alao JP Da CM Stavropoulou AV Latigo JR Perumal M Pillai R He Q Atadja P Lam EW Workman P Vigushin DM Aboagye EO In vivo biological activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor LAQ824 is detectable with 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography Cancer Res 2006, 66:7621-7629 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3962 16885362
6. Molthoff CF Klabbers BM Berkhof J Felten JT van Gelder M Windhorst AD Slotman BJ Lammertsma AA Monitoring response to radiotherapy in human squamous cell cancer bearing nude mice: Comparison of 2′-deoxy-2′-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) and 3′-[18F]fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine (FLT) Mol Imaging Biol 2007, 9:340-347 2040178 17643202 10.1007/s11307-007-0104-5
7. Su H Bodenstein C Dumont RA Seimbille Y Dubinett S Phelps ME Herschman H Czernin J Weber W Monitoring tumor glucose utilization by positron emission tomography for the prediction of treatment response to epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitors Clin Cancer Res 2006, 12:5659-5667 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0368 17020967
8. Waldherr C Mellinghoff IK Tran C Halpern BS Rozengurt N Safaei A Weber WA Stout D Satyamurthy N Barrio J Phelps ME Silverman DH Sawyers CL Czernin J Monitoring antiproliferative responses to kinase inhibitor therapy in mice with 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine PET J Nucl Med 2005, 46:114-120 15632041
9. Bland JM Altman DG Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1986, 1:307-310 2868172
10. Cheung AM Brown AS Hastie LA Cucevic V Roy M Lacefield JC Fenster A Foster FS Three-dimensional ultrasound biomicroscopy for xenograft growth analysis Ultrasound Med Biol 2005, 31:865-870 10.1016/ j.ultrasmedbio.2005.03.003 15936502
11. Mazurchuk R Glaves D Raghavan D Magnetic resonance imaging of response to chemotherapy in orthotopic xenografts of human bladder cancer Clin Cancer Res 1997, 3:1635-1641 9815854
12. Ishimori T Tatsumi M Wahl RL Tumor response assessment is more robust with sequential CT scanning than external caliper measurements Acad Radiol 2005, 12:776-781 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.062 15935976