Polygraphus grandiclava (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) collected from pine and cherry trees: A phylogenetic analysis

European Journal of Entomology

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 789-792

  Avtzis, Dimitrios ^a   Knížek, Milos ^b   Hellrigl, Klaus ^c   Stauffer, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b FORESTRY AND GAME MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

^c NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Host races; Phylogeography; Polygraphus grandiclava; Scolytinae; Speciation

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; CONIFEROUS TREE; HOST PLANT; MITOCHONDRION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

COLEOPTERA; CURCULIONIDAE; PINACEAE; POLYGRAPHUS; ROSACEAE; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 55349100932     PISSN: 12105759     EISSN: 18028829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2008.104     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AKAIKE H. 1974: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 19: 716-723.
2. ARTHOFER W., AVTZIS D.N., SCHLICK-STEINER B., STEINER F., CROZIER R. & STAUFFER C. 2008:CLessons from a beetle and an ant: coping with taxon-dependent differences in microsatellite development success. J. Mol. Evol. 65: 304-307.
3. AVTZIS D.N., ARTHOFER W. & STAUFFER C. 2008: Sympatric occurrence of diverged mtDNA lineages of Pityogenes chalcographus (Coleoptera, Scolytinae) in Europe. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 331-340.
4. BARLUENGA M., STÖLTING K.N., SALZBURGER W., MUSCHICK M. & MEYER A. 2006: Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439: 719-723.
5. BERLOCHER S.H. & FEDER J.L. 2002: Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: Moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 773-815.
6. BUSH G. 1969: Mating behavior, host specificity, and the ecological significance of sibling species in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Am. Nat. 103: 669-672.
7. DRES M. & MALLET J. 2002: Host races in plant feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 357: 471-492.
8. EHRLICH P.R. & RAVEN P.H. 1964: Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
9. ERICHSON W.F. 1836: Systemtische Auseinandersetzung der Familie der Borkenkäfer (Bostrichidae). Arch. Naturgesch. 2: 45-65.
10. EXCOFFIER L., SMOUSE P.E. & QUATTRO J.M. 1992: Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
11. EXCOFFIER L., LAVAL G. & SCHNEIDER S. 2005: Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online 1: 47-50.
12. FEDER J.L., XIE X., RULL J., VELEZ S., FORBES A., LEUNG B., DAMBROSKI H., FILCHAK K.E. & ALUJA M. 2005: Mayr, Dobzhansky, and Bush and the complexities of sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 102: 6573-6580.
13. HASEGAWA M., KISHINO H. & YANO T. 1985: Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22: 160-174.
14. HEWITT G.M. 1999: Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68: 87-112.
15. HOPKINS A.D. 1915: Contributions toward a monograph of the scolytid beetles, Part II. Preliminary classification of the superfamily Scolytoidae. US Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology. Tech. Bull. 17: 165-232, pls 9-15.
16. KIRBY W. 1837: Part 4, Insects: Coleoptera, Family Scolytidae. In Richardson (ed.): Fauna Boreali-Americana; or the Zoology of the Northern Parts of British America. J. Murray, London, pp. 191-195.
17. LUNT D.H., ZHANG D.-X., SZYMURA J.M. & HEWITT G.M. 1996: The cytochrome oxidase I gene: Evolutionary patterns and conserved primers for phylogenetic studies. Insect Mol. Biol. 5: 153-165.
18. MAYR E. 1963: Populations, Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Harvard, 453 pp.
19. MOCK K.E., BENTZ B.J., O'NEILL E.M.O., CHONG P., ORWIN J. & PFRENDER M.E. 2007: Landscape- scale genetic variation in a forest outbreak species, the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae). Mol. Ecol. 16: 533-568.
20. NYLANDER J.A.A. 2004: MrModeltest 2.1. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
21. PFEFFER A. 1995: Zentral und westpalaarktische Borken und Kernkafer. Pro Entomologia, c/o Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, 310 pp.
22. RODRIGUEZ F., OLIVER J.F., MARIN A. & MEDINA J.R. 1990: The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitutions. J. Theor. Biol. 142: 485-501.
23. RONQUIST F. & HUELSENBECK J.P. 2003: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
24. SAITU N. & NEI M. 1987: The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
25. SAVOLAINEN V., ANSTETT M.C., LEXER C., HUTTON I., CLARKSON J.J., NORUP M.V., POWELL M.P., SPRINGATE D., SALAMIN N. & BAKER W.J. 2006: Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441: 210-213.
26. SCHEDL K.E. 1934: Scolytidae and Platypodidae. In Winkler A. (ed.): Catalogus Coleopterorum Regionis Palaearctica. By author, Wien, pp. 1632-1647.
27. SEITNER M. 1911: Bemerkung zur Gattung Polygraphus und Aufstellung der Gattung Pseupolygraphus n. gen. Zentbl. Ges. Forstw. 3: 99-109.
28. SWAINE J.M. 1918: Canadian bark-beetles, Part 2. A preliminary classification with an account of the habits and means of control. Dominion of Canada Department of Agriculture, Entomological Branch. Tech. Bull. 14: 143.
29. TAMURA K. & NEI M. 1993: Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of the mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 512-526.
30. THOMSON C.G. 1886: Petites notices, Polygraphus punctifrons et grandiclava Thoms. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 11: 61-62.
31. TURELLI M., BARTON N.H. & COYNE J.A. 2001: Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 330-343.
32. VIA S. 1999: Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53: 1446-1457.
33. YANG Z. 1993: Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 1396-1401.