Nurses' experiences of conflicting encounters in diabetes care

European Diabetes Nursing

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 64-69

  Hornsten A ^a   Lundman, B ^a   Almberg, A ^b   Sandstrom H ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Väterbotten County Council   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conflicts; Diabetes nurses; Empowerment; Encounters; Patient education; Patient centred approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 55349093009     PISSN: 15517853     EISSN: 15517861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/edn.112     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. IDF. A Desktop Guide to Type 1 (Insulin-dependent) Diabetes. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 1998.
2. IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2005.
3. Funnell MM, Nwankwo R, Gillard ML, et al. Implementing an empowerment-based diabetes self-management education program. Diabetes Educ 2005; 31: 53-61.
4. Ellis SE, Speroff T, Dittus RS, et al. Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 52: 97-105.
5. Toombs K. The Meaning of Illness: a Phenomenological Account of the Different Perspective of Physicians and Patients. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993; 19-23.
6. Lewin SA, Skea ZC, Entwistle V, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4, Art No: CD003267. DOI:10.1002/14651858. CD003267.
7. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. Br Med J 2001; 322: 468-472.
8. Goedhuis J, Rethans JJ. On the relationship between the efficiency and the quality of consultation: a validity study. Fam Pract 2001; 18: 592-596.
9. King EB, Schlundt DG, Pichert JW, et al. Improving the skills of health professionals in engaging patients in diabetes-related problem solving. J Cont Educ Health Prof 2002; 22: 94-102.
10. James P. Non-judgmental care: helping nurses overcome their negative attitudes to patients. All Ireland J Nurs Midwif 2003; 2: 18-21.
11. Thorne SE, Ternulf-Nyhlin K, Paterson BL. Attitudes toward patient expertise in chronic illness. Int J Nurs Stud 2000; 37: 303-311.
12. Ogden J, Bandara I, Cohen H, et al. General practitioners' and patients' models of obesity: whose problem is it? Patient Educ Couns 2001; 44: 227-233.
13. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Br Med J 1995; 311: 299-302.
14. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Tod 2004; 24: 105-112.
15. Zoffman V, Kirkevold M. Life versus disease in difficult diabetes care: conflicting perspectives disempower patients and professionals in problem solving. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 750-765.
16. Cohen MZ, Tripp-Reimer T, Smith C, et al. Explanatory models of diabetes: patient practitioner variation. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 59-66.
17. Hunt LM, Nedal HA, Larme AC. Contrasting patient and practitioner perspectives in type 2 diabetes management. West J Nurs Res 1998; 20: 656-676.
18. Loewe R, Freeman J. Interpreting diabetes mellitus: differences between patient and provider models of disease and their implications for clinical practice. Cult Med Psychiatry 2000; 24: 379-401.
19. Foucault M. The Birth of the Clinic: an Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage Books, 1973; 88-106.
20. Lerner B. From careless consumptives to recalcitrant patients - the historical construction of non-compliance. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1423-1431.
21. Paterson B. Myth of empowerment in chronic illness. J Adv Nurs 2001; 34: 574-581.