North American institutions most frequently represented in high-impact library journals

Libres

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Seaman, Scott ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55249119992     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10586768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Library Association. (2006). Search the ALA Directory of Accredited Programs: Limit to Schools Offering the PhD. Retrieved April 4, 2008 from http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=lisdirb&Template=/cfapps/ lisdir/lisdir_search.cfm
2. Association of College and Research Libraries. (2005a). 2004 Academic Library Trends and Statistics for Carnegie Classification: Doctorate-Granting Institutions. Chicago: ACRL.
3. Association of College and Research Libraries. (2005b). 2004 Academic Library Trends and Statistics for Carnegie Classification: Master's Colleges and Institutions Baccalaureate Colleges. Chicago: ACRL.
4. Association of Research Libraries. (2006a). ARL Member Libraries' Information Services. Retrieved April 4, 2008 from http://www.arl.org/ members.html.
5. Association of Research Libraries. (2006b). Statistics and Measurement Program; ARL Statistics WWW Interactive Edition Ranked Lists. Retrieved September 27, 2008 from http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/arlbin/arl.cgi? task=setuprank;
6. Bates, M.J. (1998). The Role of Publication Type in the Evaluation of LIS Programs. Library & Information Science Research, 20, 197.
7. Blixrud, J.C. (2000). SPEC Kit 257: The M.L.S. Hiring Requirement. Association of Research Libraries, Office of Leadership and Management Services.
8. Budd, J.M. (1995). Faculty Publishing Productivity: An Institutional Analysis and Comparison with Library and Other Measures. College & Research Libraries, 56, 547-54.
9. Budd, J.M. (1999). Increases in Faculty Publishing Activity: An Analysis of ARL and ACRL Institutions." College & Research Libraries, 60, 308-15.
10. Budd, J.M. (2000). Scholarly Productivity of U.S. L.I.S. Faculty: An Update. Library Quarterly, 70, 230-45.
11. Budd, J.M. (2006). Faculty Publishing Productivity: Comparisons Over Time. College & Research Libraries, 67, 230-9.
12. Hart, R. (1999). Scholarly Publication by University Librarians: A Study at Penn State. College & Research Libraries, 60, 454-62.
13. Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research. (2008). Citation Statistics: A Report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in Cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS). Retrieved September 27, 2008 from International Mathematical Union: http://www.mathunion.org/publications/report/
14. Kohl, D., and Davis, C.H. (1985). Ratings of Journals by ARL Library Directors and Deans of Library and Information Science Schools." College & Research Libraries, 46, 40-7.
15. Lokman, M. and Spurgin, K. (2005). Ranking the Research Productivity of Library and Information Science Faculty and Schools: An Evaluation of Data Sources and Research Methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 1314-31.
16. Nisonger, T.E. (2004). The Benefits and Drawbacks of Impact Factor for Journal Collection Management in Libraries. Serials Librarian, 47, 57-75.
17. Nisonger, T.E. and Davis, C.H. (2005). The Perception of Library and Information Science Journals by LIS Education Deans and ARL Library directors: A Replication of the Kohl-Davis Study. College & Research Libraries, 66, 341-77.
18. Thomson Scientific. (2006a). Impact Factor. Retrieved April 3, 2008, from http://jcr1.isiknowledge.com/JCR/help/h_impfact.htm 2005.
19. Thomson Scientific. (2006b). 2005 JCR Social Sciences Edition. Journal Summary List: Information Science and Library Science. Retrieved April 4, 2008 from http://portal.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi/jcr?Init=Yes&SID= E1p5IJDm@f21LpngEhG.
20. Thomson Scientific. (2006c). Scope Notes 2005 Social Science Categories: Category Name, Information Science and Library Science. Retrieved April 4, 2008 from http://portal.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi/jcr?Init= Yes&SID=E1p5IJDm@f21LpngEhG.
21. Thomson Scientific. (2006d). How to Calculate a Five-Year Impact Factor. Retrieved April 4, 2008 from http://jcr1.isiknowledge.com/JCR/help/ h_fiveyr_if.htm#five_year_if.
22. Weller, A.C., Hurd, J.M., and Wiberley, S.E. (1999). Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians from 1993 to 1997. College & Research Libraries, 60, 352-62.
23. Wiberley, S.E., Hurd, J.M., and Weller, A.C. (2006). Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians from 1998 to 2002. College & Research Libraries, 67, 205-16.
24. Zainab, A.N. (2000). Publication Productivity, Focus on Institutional, Collaborative and Communicational Correlates: A Review of the Literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 5, 53-94.
25. Zemon, M. and Bahr, A.H. (1998) An Analysis of Articles by College Librarians. College & Research Libraries, 59, 422-32.
26. Zemon, M. and Bahr, A.H. (2000) Collaborative Authorship in the Journal Literature: Perspectives for Academic Librarians Who Wish to Publish. College & Research Libraries, 61, 410-19.