A practical approach for performance-driven UML modelling of handheld devices - A case study

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 75-88

  Pustina, Lukas ^a   Schwarzer, Simon ^a   Gerharz, Michael ^b   Martini, Peter ^a   Deichmann, Volker ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER FKIE   (Germany)

^c NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Composite structure diagram; MARTE; Modelling; Multiclass queueing networks; Performance engineering; Performance evaluation; SPT; UML

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES; GAME THEORY; HAND HELD COMPUTERS; QUEUEING NETWORKS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION); UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

MARTE; MODELLING; MULTICLASS QUEUEING NETWORKS; PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; SPT; UML;

QUEUEING THEORY;

EID: 55249119303     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.065     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Balsamo S., Marco A.D., Inverardi P., and Simeoni M. Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 30 5 (2004) 295-310
2. Balsamo, S., Marzallo, M. 2005. Performance evaluation of UML system architectures with multiclass queueing network models. In: WOS. pp. 37-42.
3. Baskett F., Chandy K.M., Muntz R.R., and Palacios F.G. Open, closed, and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers. J. ACM 22 (1975) 248-260
4. Bernardi S., Donatelli S., and Merseguer J. From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable petri net models. WOSP'02 (2002), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 35-45
5. Chaoui J., Cyr K., de Gregorio S., Giacalone J.-P., Webb J., and Masse Y. Open multimedia application platform: enabling multimedia applications in third generation wireless terminals through a combined risc/dsp architecture. ICASSP'01: Proceedings of the Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2001 on IEEE International Conference (2001), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA 1009-1012
6. Cortellessa, V., Mirandola, R., 2000. Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams. In: Workshop on Software and Performance. pp. 58-70.
7. Cortellessa V., and Mirandola R. Prima-UML: a performance validation incremental methodology on early UML diagrams. Sci. Comput. Program 44 1 (2002) 101-129
8. Cortellessa, V., Gentile, M., Pizzuti, M. 2004. Xprit: an XML-based tool to translate UML diagrams into execution graphs and queueing networks. In: QEST. pp. 342-343.
9. Espinoza, H., Dubois, H., Medina, J., Grard, S., 2005. A general structure for the analysis framework of the UML martes profile, October.
10. ETSI, 2005. UML profile for communicating systems (draft).
11. Homepage of U2Q. .
12. ISO, Iso/iec 14496. .
13. Jain R. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis (1991), Wiley Professional Computing, New York
14. Marco A.D., and Inverardi P. Compositional generation of software architecture performance qn models. WICSA (2004), IEEE Computer Society 37-46
15. Marzolla, M., Balsamo, S., 2004. UML-psi: the UML performance simulator. In: QEST. pp. 340-341.
16. Merseguer J., and Campos J. Software performance modeling using UML and petri nets. In: Calzarossa M., and Gelenbe E. (Eds). MASCOTS Tutorials. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2965 (2003), Springer 265-289
17. MPlayer. .
18. Omap platform. .
19. OMG, 2003. UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance, and Time Specification 1.0, Object Management Group.
20. OMG, 2007. A UML Profile for MARTE, Beta 1, Object Management Group.
21. Omnet++ - general purpose network simulator. .
22. OpenZaurus. .
23. Org, D.-H., DVB-H homepage. .
24. Petriu D.C., and Wang X. From UML descriptions of high-level software architectures to lqn performance models. AGTIVE'99: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance (2000), Springer-Verlag, London, UK 47-62
25. Pooley, R., King, P., 1999. The unified modeling language and performance engineering. In: IEE Proceedings - Software. pp. 2-10.
26. Pustina, L., Deichmann, V., Gerharz, M., Martini, P., Schwarzer, S., 2006. Performance aware design of communication systems. In: Proceedings of the LCN 2006. pp. 39-46.
27. Pustina, L., Deichmann, V., Gerharz, M., Martini, P., Schwarzer, S., 2007. Performance evaluation of a DVB-H enabled mobile device system model. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Software and Performance WOSP 2007. pp. 164-171.
28. Ramkishor, K., Gunashree, V., 2001. Real time implementation of MPEG-4 video decoder on ARM7TDMI. In: Intelligent Multimedia, Video and Speech Processing. pp. 522-526.
29. Smith C.U., and Williams L.G. Performance Solutions, A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software (2001), Addison-Wesley Pearson Education
30. Telelogic Tau G2 homepage. .
31. Wiegand T., Sullivan G.J., Bjntegaard G., and Luthra A. Overview of the h.264/avc video coding standard. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 13 7 (2003) 560-576
32. Williams, L.G., Smith, C.U., 1998. Performance evaluation of software architectures. In: WOSP, pp. 164-177.
33. Woodside M., Petriu D.C., Petriu D.B., Shen H., Israr T., and Merseguer J. Performance by unified model analysis (puma). WOSP'05 Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Software and Performance (2005), ACM Press 1-12
34. Xu J., Woodside C.M., and Petriu D.C. Performance analysis of a software design using the UML profile for schedulability, performance, and time. In: Kemper P., and Sanders W.H. (Eds). Computer Performance Evaluation/TOOLS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2794 (2003), Springer 291-307