Alternative dispute resolution in virtual organizations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4995 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 72-89

  Pitt, Jeremy ^a   Ramirez Cano, Daniel ^a   Kamara, Lloyd ^a   Neville, Brendan ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENTS; AGILE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; REFRIGERATORS; SPECIFICATIONS; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

AGILE ENTERPRISES; ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS; AUTONOMIC SYSTEMS; DRIVING FORCES; HOLONIC MANUFACTURING; NETWORKED SYSTEMS; PROTOCOL OPERATIONS; SYSTEM OPERATIONS; TWO WAYS; VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 55249111327     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87654-0_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Brafman, O., Beckstrom, R.: The Starfish And The Spider. Penguin (2006)
2. Mařík, V., William Brennan, R., Pěchouček, M. (eds.): HoloMAS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3593. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
3. Boyson, S., Corsi, T.: Managing the real-time supply chain. In: HICSS 2002, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)
4. Pitt, J., Mamdani, A., Charlton, P.: The open agent society and its enemies: a position statement and research programme. Telematics and Informatics 18(1), 67-87 (2001)
5. Pitt, J.: The open agent society as a platform for the user-friendly information society. AI Soc. 19(2), 123-158 (2005)
6. Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Pitt, J.: Specifying norm-governed computational societies. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (to appear)
7. Cevenini, C.: Legal considerations on the use of software agents in virtual enterprises. In: Bing, J., Sartor, C. (eds.) The Law of Electronic Agents, vol. 4, pp. 133-146. Unipubskriftserier, Oslo (2003)
8. Makinson, D.: On the formal representation of rights relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 15, 403-425 (1986)
9. Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Journal of the IGPL 4(3), 429-445 (1996)
10. Schultz, T., Kaufmann-Kohler, G., Langer, D., Bonnet, Y.: Online dispute resolution: The state of the art and the issues. Technical report, Report of the E-Com / E-Law Research Project of the University of Geneva (2001)
11. Slate II, W.: Online dispute resolution: Click here to settle your dispute. Dispute Resolution Journal 8 (2002)
12. WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center: Dispute resolution for the 21st century (2007). http://arbiter.wipo.int
13. United Nations. In: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development - E-commerce and development report, ch.7, New York, Geneva, vol. UNC-TAD/STDTE/ECB/2003/, pp. 177-203 (2003), http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/ ecdr2003ch7_en.pdf
14. Kowalchyk, A.W.: Resolving intellectual property disputes outside of court: Using ADR to take control of your case. Dispute Resolution Journal 61(2), 28-37 (2006)
15. OECD: OECD workshop on dispute resolution and redress in the global market-place: Report of the workshop. Technical Report DSTI/CP(2005)9, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005)
16. Ware, S.J.: Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution. West Group (2007)
17. American Arbitration Association (2007), http://www.adr.org/drs
18. WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center: Guide to WIPO Arbitration (2007), http://arbiter.wipo.int
19. ALIS: Deliverable D3.1: Formal characteristics of legal and regulatory reasoning from the computational logic point of view. Available from ISN Group, EEE Dept., Imperial College London (2008)
20. ALIS: Deliverable D3.2: ALIS ADR-S: The ALIS alternative dispute resolution service. Available from ISN Group. EEE Dept., Imperial College London (2008)
21. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing 4(1), 67-96 (1986)
22. Ramirez-Cano, D., Pitt, J.: Follow the leader: Profiling agents in an opinion formation model of dynamic confidence and individual mind-sets. In: IAT, pp. 660-667 (2006)
23. Devine, D.J., Clayton, L.D., Dunford, B.B., Seying, R., Pryce, J.: Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 7(3), 622-727 (2001)
24. Pennington, N., Hastie, R.: Juror decision-making models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin 89(2), 246-287 (1981)
25. Bennett, W.L.: Storytelling in criminal trials: A model of social judgment. Quarterly Journal of Speech 64(1), 1-22 (1978)
26. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Dunne, P.E.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15), 619-641 (2007)
27. Chesňevar, C.I., Maguitman, A.G., Loui, R.P.: Logical models of argument. ACM Comput. Surv. 32(4), 337-383 (2000)
28. Walker, G.B., Daniels, S.E.: Argument and alternative dispute resolution systems. Argumentation 9, 693-704 (1995)
29. Sartor, G.: A formal model of legal argumentation. Ratio Juris 7(2), 177-211 (1994)
30. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4(3-4), 331-368 (1996)
31. Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Pitt, J.: An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15), 776-804 (2007)
32. Pitt, J., Kamara, L., Sergot, M., Artikis, A.: Voting in Multi-Agent Systems. The Computer Journal 49(2), 156-170 (2006)
33. American Bar Association: Principles for juries and jury trials (2005), http://www.abanet.org/juryprojectstandards/principles.pdf
34. Giunchiglia, E., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V., McCain, N., Turner, H.: Nonmonotonic causal theories. Artif. Intell. 153(1-2), 49-104 (2004)
35. Kaponis, D., Pitt, J.: Dynamic specifications in normative computational societies. In: O'Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O'Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 265-283. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
36. Surowiecki, J.: The wisdom of crowds. Doubleday (2004)
37. Reynolds, C., Picard, R.: Affective sensors, privacy, and ethical contracts. In: CHI 2004: extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1103-1106. ACM Press, New York (2004)
38. Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press (1999)