Corticofugal modulation of the paradoxical latency shifts of inferior collicular neurons

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 1127-1134

  Ma, Xiaofeng ^a   Suga, Nobuo ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; BAT; CYTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION RESPONSE; REACTION TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; CHIROPTERA; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; INFERIOR COLLICULI; NEURONS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 55249107116     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90508.2008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Berkowitz A, Suga N. Neural mechanisms of ranging are different in two species of bats. Hear Res 41: 255-264, 1989.
2. Covey E. Response properties of single units in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and paralemniscal zone of an echolocating bat. J Neurophysiol 69: 842-859, 1993.
3. Covey E, Casseday JH. Timing in the auditory system of the bat. Annu Rev Physiol 61: 457-476, 1999.
4. Ferragamo MJ, Haresign T, Simmons JA. Frequency tuning, latencies, and responses to frequency-modulated sweeps in the inferior colliculus of the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol [A] 182: 65-79, 1998.
5. Galazyuk AV, Feng AS. Oscillation may play a role in time domain central auditory processing. J Neurosci 21: RC147, 2001.
6. Galazyuk AV, Lin W, Llano D, Feng AS. Leading inhibition to neural oscillation is important for time-domain processing in the auditory midbrain. J Neurophysiol 94: 314-326, 2005.
7. Gao E, Suga N. Experience-dependent corticofugal adjustment of midbrain frequency map in bat auditory system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 12663-12670, 1998.
8. Heil P. Further observations on the threshold model of latency for auditory neurons. Behav Brain Res 95: 233-236, 1998.
9. Heil P, Irvine DR. First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 78: 2438-2454, 1997.
10. Jen PH, Chen QC, Wu FJ. Interaction between excitation and inhibition affects frequency tuning curve, response size and latency of neurons in the auditory cortex of the big brown bat,Eptesicus fuscus. Hear Res 174: 281-289, 2002.
11. Klug A, Khan A, Burger RM, Bauer EE, Hurley LM, Yang L, Grothe B, Halvorsen MB, Park TJ. Latency as a function of intensity in auditory neurons: influences of central processing. Hear Res 148: 107-123, 2000.
12. Ma X, Suga N. Corticofugal modulation of duration-tuned neurons in the midbrain auditory nucleus in bats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 14060-14065, 2001.
13. O'Neill WE, Suga N. Target range-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. Science 203: 69-73, 1979.
14. Sanderson MI, Simmons JA. Target representation of naturalistic echolocation sequences in single unit responses from the inferior colliculus of big brown bats. J Acoust Soc Am 118: 3352-3361, 2005.
15. Simmons JA. Evidence for perception of fine echo delay and phase by the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol [A] 172: 533-547, 1993.
16. Simmons JA. The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am 54: 157-173, 1973.
17. Simmons JA. Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar. Science 22: 1336-1338, 1979.
18. Simmons JA, Ferragamo M, Moss CF, Stevenson SB, Altes RA. Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus: the shape of target images in echolocation. J Comp Physiol [A] 167: 589-616, 1990.
19. Suga N. Functional properties of auditory neurones in the cortex of echolocating bats. J Physiol 181: 671-700, 1965a.
20. Suga N. Responses of cortical auditory neurones to frequency modulated sounds in echo-locating bats. Nature 206: 890-891, 1965b.
21. Suga N. Analysis of frequency-modulated and complex sounds by single auditory neurones of bats. J Physiol 198: 51-80, 1968.
22. Suga N. Echo-ranging neurons in the inferior colliculus of bats. Science 170: 449-452, 1970.
23. Suga N. Principles of auditory information-processing derived from neuroethology. J Exp Biol 146: 277-286, 1989.
24. Suga N, Gao E, Zhang Y, Ma X, Olsen JF. The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 11807-11814, 2000.
25. Suga N, Kawasaki M, Burkard RF. Delay-tuned neurons in auditory cortex of mustached bat are not suited for processing directional information. J Neurophysiol 64: 225-235, 1990.
26. Suga N, Ma X. Multiparametric corticofugal modulation and plasticity in the auditory system. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 783-794, 2003.
27. Suga N, O'Neill WE. Neural axis representing target range in the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. Science 206: 351-353, 1979.
28. Sullivan WE 3rd. Neural representation of target distance in auditory cortex of the echolocating batMyotis lucifugus. J Neurophysiol 48: 1011-1032, 1982a.
29. Sullivan WE 3rd. Possible neural mechanisms of target distance coding in auditory system of the echolocating bat Myotis lucifugus. J Neurophysiol 48: 1033-1047, 1982b.
30. Wang X, Galazyuk AV, Feng AS. FM signals produce robust paradoxical latency shifts in the bat's inferior colliculus. J Comp Physiol [A] 193: 13-20, 2007.
31. Yan J, Suga N. Corticofugal modulation of time-domain processing of biosonar information in bats. Science 273: 1100-1103, 1996.
32. Yang L, Pollak GD, Resler C. GABAergic circuits sharpen tuning curves and modify response properties in the mustache bat inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 68: 1760-1774, 1992.