Neural and behavioral mechanisms of olfactory perception

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 408-412

  Wilson, Rachel I ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COFFEE; EXCITATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INSECT; NONHUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY BULB; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAMPLE; SMELLING; SNIFFING; TOPOGRAPHY; VERTEBRATE; WAKEFULNESS;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; HUMANS; ODORS; OLFACTORY BULB; OLFACTORY PATHWAYS; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR NEURONS; SMELL;

EID: 55249102358     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.015     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Bargmann C.I. Comparative chemosensation from receptors to ecology. Nature 444 (2006) 295-301
2. Yokoi M., Mori K., and Nakanishi S. Refinement of odor molecule tuning by dendrodendritic synaptic inhibition in the olfactory bulb. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92 (1995) 3371-3375
3. In: Shepherd G.M. (Ed). The Synaptic Organization of the Brain (1998), Oxford University Press, New York
4. Luo M., and Katz L.C. Response correlation maps of neurons in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron 32 (2001) 1165-1179
5. Davison I.G., and Katz L.C. Sparse and selective odor coding by mitral/tufted neurons in the main olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 27 (2007) 2091-2101. This is the most systematic study to date of the odor selectivity of olfactory bulb M/T cells. At low odor concentrations, a M/T cell was typically excited or inhibited by a small fraction of all test odors. The odors that excited a given M/T cell sometimes shared obvious chemical features, but this was not always the case.
6. Willhite D.C., Nguyen K.T., Masurkar A.V., Greer C.A., Shepherd G.M., and Chen W.R. Viral tracing identifies distributed columnar organization in the olfactory bulb. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (2006) 12592-12597. This study is the first to tackle the question of lateral connectivity using modern anatomical methods. A viral transsynaptic tracer revealed a surprising pattern of sparse, long-range connections between glomeruli.
7. Cleland T.A., and Sethupathy P. Non-topographical contrast enhancement in the olfactory bulb. BMC Neurosci 7 (2006) 7
8. Olsen S.R., and Wilson R.I. Lateral presynaptic inhibition mediates gain control in an olfactory circuit. Nature 452 (2008) 956-960
9. Arevian A.C., Kapoor V., and Urban N.N. Activity-dependent gating of lateral inhibition in the mouse olfactory bulb. Nat Neurosci 11 (2008) 80-87
10. Laurent G. Olfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci 3 (2002) 884-895
11. Laurent G., Stopfer M., Friedrich R.W., Rabinovich M.I., Volkovskii A., and Abarbanel H.D. Odor encoding as an active, dynamical process: experiments, computation, and theory. Annu Rev Neurosci 24 (2001) 263-297
12. •].
13. •].
14. •], this paper independently reached the conclusion that antennal lobe glomeruli are linked by excitatory (and not purely inhibitory) lateral connections. These may be the first studies to combine in vivo measurements of neural activity in Drosophila with genetic manipulations of neural activity.
15. Christie J.M., and Westbrook G.L. Lateral excitation within the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 26 (2006) 2269-2277
16. Pimentel D.O., and Margrie T.W. Glutamatergic transmission and plasticity between olfactory bulb mitral cells. J Physiol 586 (2008) 2107-2119
17. Bhandawat V., Olsen S.R., Schlief M.L., Gouwens N.W., and Wilson R.I. Sensory processing in the Drosophila antennal lobe increases the reliability and separability of ensemble odor representations. Nat Neurosci 10 (2007) 1474-1482. This study systematically compared the inputs and outputs to several identified glomeruli in the Drosophila antennal lobe. The results of this comparison showed that the transformation of odor representations in the antennal lobe makes PN responses more reliable than ORN odor responses, and increases the average separation between odor representations in multiglomerular ensemble coding space.
18. Kazama H., and Wilson R.I. Homeostatic matching and nonlinear amplification at genetically-identified central synapses. Neuron 58 (2008) 401-413
19. Schlief M.L., and Wilson R.I. Olfactory processing and behavior downstream from highly selective receptor neurons. Nat Neurosci 10 (2007) 623-630
20. Murphy G.J., Darcy D.P., and Isaacson J.S. Intraglomerular inhibition: signaling mechanisms of an olfactory microcircuit. Nat Neurosci 8 (2005) 354-364
21. McGann J.P., Pirez N., Gainey M.A., Muratore C., Elias A.S., and Wachowiak M. Odorant representations are modulated by intra- but not interglomerular presynaptic inhibition of olfactory sensory neurons. Neuron 48 (2005) 1039-1053
22. Pirez N., and Wachowiak M. In vivo modulation of sensory input to the olfactory bulb by tonic and activity-dependent presynaptic inhibition of receptor neurons. J Neurosci 28 (2008) 6360-6371
23. Vucinic D., Cohen L.B., and Kosmidis E.K. Interglomerular center-surround inhibition shapes odorant-evoked input to the mouse olfactory bulb in vivo. J Neurophysiol 95 (2006) 1881-1887
24. Shepherd G.M., Chen W.R., Willhite D., Migliore M., and Greer C.A. The olfactory granule cell: from classical enigma to central role in olfactory processing. Brain Res Rev 55 (2007) 373-382
25. Dethier V.G. Sniff, flick, and pulse: an appreciation of interruption. Proc Am Philos Soc 131 (1987) 159-176
26. Kepecs A., Uchida N., and Mainen Z.F. The sniff as a unit of olfactory processing. Chem Senses 31 (2006) 167-179
27. Koehl M.A. The fluid mechanics of arthropod sniffing in turbulent odor plumes. Chem Senses 31 (2006) 93-105
28. Mainland J., and Sobel N. The sniff is part of the olfactory percept. Chem Senses 31 (2006) 181-196
29. Vickers N.J. Winging it: moth flight behavior and responses of olfactory neurons are shaped by pheromone plume dynamics. Chem Senses 31 (2006) 155-166
30. Johnson B.N., Mainland J.D., and Sobel N. Rapid olfactory processing implicates subcortical control of an olfactomotor system. J Neurophysiol 90 (2003) 1084-1094
31. Budick S.A., and Dickinson M.H. Free-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors. J Exp Biol 209 (2006) 3001-3017
32. Uchida N., and Mainen Z.F. Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat. Nat Neurosci 6 (2003) 1224-1229
33. Abraham N.M., Spors H., Carleton A., Margrie T.W., Kuner T., and Schaefer A.T. Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice. Neuron 44 (2004) 865-876
34. Rinberg D., Koulakov A., and Gelperin A. Speed-accuracy tradeoff in olfaction. Neuron 51 (2006) 351-358
35. Wesson D.W., Carey R.M., Verhagen J.V., and Wachowiak M. Rapid encoding and perception of novel odors in the rat. PLoS Biol 6 (2008) e82
36. Bathellier B., Buhl D.L., Accolla R., and Carleton A. Dynamic ensemble odor coding in the mammalian olfactory bulb: sensory information at different timescales. Neuron 57 (2008) 586-598
37. Spors H., Wachowiak M., Cohen L.B., and Friedrich R.W. Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 26 (2006) 1247-1259
38. Friedrich R.W. Mechanisms of odor discrimination: neurophysiological and behavioral approaches. Trends Neurosci 29 (2006) 40-47
39. Margrie T.W., and Schaefer A.T. Theta oscillation coupled spike latencies yield computational vigour in a mammalian sensory system. J Physiol 546 (2003) 363-374
40. Gollisch T., and Meister M. Rapid neural coding in the retina with relative spike latencies. Science 319 (2008) 1108-1111
41. Verhagen J.V., Wesson D.W., Netoff T.I., White J.A., and Wachowiak M. Sniffing controls an adaptive filter of sensory input to the olfactory bulb. Nat Neurosci 10 (2007) 631-639. In a technical tour-de-force, these investigators loaded calcium dyes selectively into ORNs and performed calcium imaging in the olfactory bulb in awake, behaving rats. They discovered that when rats spontaneously elevate their sniff rate in response to a novel odor, this produces a profound depression in ORN input to the bulb. This has important implications for the proposed function of sniff-rate modulations in olfactory perception.
42. Kepecs A., Uchida N., and Mainen Z.F. Rapid and precise control of sniffing during olfactory discrimination in rats. J Neurophysiol 98 (2007) 205-213. This study found that sniffing is modulated not only by odor detection, but also by the anticipation of odors and by reward delivery. This may partially explain why M/T cell activity reflects aspects of the behavioral context that are not strictly related to odor delivery.
43. Kay L.M., and Laurent G. Odor- and context-dependent modulation of mitral cell activity in behaving rats. Nat Neurosci 2 (1999) 1003-1009
44. Rinberg D., Koulakov A., and Gelperin A. Sparse odor coding in awake behaving mice. J Neurosci 26 (2006) 8857-8865. This study was the first to compare the activity of an individual M/T cell in the awake and anesthetized animal. Surprisingly, M/T cell activity was much sparser in the awake state. Moreover, M/T cell activity was clearly modulated by aspects of the behavioral context that were not related to odor delivery (see also Ref. [43]).
45. Balu R., Pressler R.T., and Strowbridge B.W. Multiple modes of synaptic excitation of olfactory bulb granule cells. J Neurosci 27 (2007) 5621-5632
46. Laaris N., Puche A., and Ennis M. Complementary postsynaptic activity patterns elicited in olfactory bulb by stimulation of mitral/tufted and centrifugal fiber inputs to granule cells. J Neurophysiol 97 (2007) 296-306
47. Fuentes RA, Aguilar MI, Aylwin ML, Maldonado PE: Neuronal activity of mitral-tufted cells in awake rats during passive and active odorant stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2008, in press doi:10.1152/jn.00095.02008.
48. Beshel J., Kopell N., and Kay L.M. Olfactory bulb gamma oscillations are enhanced with task demands. J Neurosci 27 (2007) 8358-8365
49. Doucette W., Milder J., and Restrepo D. Adrenergic modulation of olfactory bulb circuitry affects odor discrimination. Learn Mem 14 (2007) 539-547