Parameter dependent performance specifications of software components

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4214 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 163-179

  Koziolek, Heiko ^a   Happe, Jens ^a   Becker, Steffen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; ARCHITECTURAL LEVELS; AS DISTRIBUTION; COMPONENT-BASED ARCHITECTURE; DESIGN DECISIONS; DESIGN DOCUMENTS; INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS; ONLINE STORE; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS; QUALITY OF SOFTWARES; RESPONSE TIME; SOFTWARE COMPONENT; UML DIAGRAMS; UML SPECIFICATIONS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; FORECASTING; SPECIFICATIONS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 55249085538     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11921998_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S. Balsamo, A. DiMarco, P. Inverardi, and M. Simeoni. Model-based performance prediction in software development: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(5):295-310, May 2004.
2. S. Becker, L. Grunske, R. Mirandola, and S. Overhage. Performance prediction of component-based systems: A survey from an engineering perspective. In Ralf Reussner, Judith Stafford, and Clemens Szyperski, editors, Architecting Systems with Trustworthy Components, number To Appear in LNCS. Springer, 2005.
3. S. Becker and R. Reussner. The Impact of Software Component Adaptation on Quality of Service Properties. L'objet, 12(1):105-125, 2006.
4. A. Bertolino and R. Mirandola. CB-SPE Tool: Putting component-based performance engineering into practice. In I. Crnkovic, J. A. Stafford, H. W. Schmidt, and K. C. Wallnau, editors, CBSE2004, volume 3054 of LNCS, pages 233-248. Springer, 2004.
5. E. Bondarev, P. de With, M. Chaudron, and J. Musken. Modelling of input-parameter dependency for performance predictions of component-based embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 31th EUROMICRO Conference (EUROMICRO'05), 2005.
6. K. Doerner and W. Gutjahr. Representation and optimization of software usage models with non-markovian state transitions. Information & Software Technology, 42(12):873-887, 2000.
7. V. Firus, S. Becker, and J. Happe. Parametric performance contracts for QML-specified software components. In Proceedings of FESCA2005, ENTCS, pages 64-79, 2005.
8. D. Hamlet, D.Mason, and D.Woit. Properties of Software Systems Synthesized from Components, volume 1 of Series on Component-Based Software Development, chapter Component-Based Software Development: Case Studies, pages 129-159. World Scientific Publishing Company, March 2004.
9. H. Koziolek and J. Happe. A quality of service driven development process model for component-based software systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE2006), 2006.
10. H. Koziolek and V.Firus. Parametric performance contracts: Non-markovian loop modelling and an experimental evaluation. In Proceedings of FESCA2006, ENTCS, 2006.
11. M. Marzolla. Simulation-Based Performance Modeling of UML Software Architectures. PhD thesis, Universit'a Ca Foscari di Venezia, 2004.
12. Object Management Group OMG. UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2005-01-02, 2005.
13. R. Reussner, S. Becker, and V. Firus. Component composition with parametric contracts. In Tagungsband der Net.ObjectDays 2004, pages 155-169, 2004.
14. M. Sitaraman, G. Kuczycki, J. Krone, W. F. Ogden, and A.L.N. Reddy. Performance speci-fication of software components. In Proc. of SSR '01, 2001.
15. C. U. Smith. Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide To Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
16. C.U. Smith. Performance Engineering of Software Systems. Addision-Wesley, 1990.
17. X. Wu and M. Woodside. Performance modeling from software components. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 29(1):290-301, 2004.