Caractérisation géostatistique de la variabilité spatiale de l’humidité du sol à l’aide des cartes dérivées des données radar à synthèse d’ouverture de RADARSAT-1

Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 376-389

  Merzouki, A ^a   Bannari, A ^b   Teillet, P M ^c   King, D J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

^d CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLOIDS; DROUGHT; GERMANIUM; GROUNDWATER; IMAGING SYSTEMS; MOISTURE; MOISTURE DETERMINATION; PERMITTIVITY; RADAR; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SOIL MOISTURE; SOILS; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR; SYNTHETIC APERTURES; TARGET DRONES;

CORRELATION LENGTHS; EMPIRICAL CALIBRATIONS; EXPONENTIAL MODELS; EXPONENTIAL TYPES; GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS; IN-SITU; INTEGRAL EQUATION MODELS; MANITOBA , CANADA; RADARSAT; RIVER BASINS; SEMIVARIOGRAM; SEMIVARIOGRAMS; SOIL MOISTURE MAPS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF; SPATIAL EXTENTS; SPATIAL ORGANIZATIONS; SPATIAL VARIABILITIES; SUPERFICIAL LAYERS;

SOIL SURVEYS;

EID: 55149107427     PISSN: 07038992     EISSN: 17127971     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5589/m08-033     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Altese, E., Bolognani, O., Mancini, M., et Troch, P.A. 1996. Retrieving soil moisture over bare soil from ERS-1 synthetic aperture radar data: Sensitivity analysis based on a theoretical surface scattering model and field data. Water Resources Research, vol. 32, p. 653-661.
2. Anctil, F., Mathieu, R., Parent, L.-E., Viau, A.A., Sbih, M., et Hessami, M. 2002. Geostatistics of near-surface moisture in bare cultivated organic soils. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 260, p. 30-37.
3. Baghdadi, N., King, C., Bourguignon, A., et Remond, A. 2002. Potential of ERS and Radarsat data for surface roughness monitoring over bare agricultural fields. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23, p. 3427-3442.
4. Baghdadi, N., Gherboudj, I., Zribi, M., Sahebi, M., King, C., et Bonn, F. 2004. Semi-empirical calibration of the IEM backscatter model using radar images and moisture and roughness field measurements. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 25, p. 3593-3623.
5. Beven, K.J., et Kirkby, M.J. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, vol. 24, p. 43-69.
6. Chen, K.S., Yen, S.K., et Huang, W.P. 1995. A simple model for retrieving bare soil moisture from radar-scattering coefficients. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 54, p. 121-126.
7. Chiles, J.P., et Delfiner, P. 1999. Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York.
8. Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics of spatial data. Wiley, New York.
9. Davidson, M., Le Toan, T., Borgeaud, M., et Manninen, T. 1998. Measuring the roughness characteristics of natural surfaces at pixel scales: Moving from 1 meter to 25 meter profiles. Dans International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 6-10 juillet 1998, Seattle, Wash. IEEE, New York, vol. 3, p. 1200-1202.
10. Davidson, M., Le Toan, T., Mattia, F., Satalino, G., Manninen, T., et Borgeaud, M., 2000. On the characterization of agricultural soil roughness for radar remote sensing studies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 38, p. 630-640.
11. Delin, K.A., et Jackson, S.P. 2000. Sensor Web for in situ exploration of gaseous biosignatures. Dans 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1825 mars 2000, Big Sky, Montana. p. 465-472. Disponible a http://sensorwebs.jpl.nasa.gov/resources/Delin-Jackson2000.pdf.
12. Delin, K.A., et Jackson, S.P., 2001. The sensor web: a new instrument concept. Dans SPIE’s Symposium on Integrated Optics, 20-26 janvier 2001, San Jose, Californie. Disponible à http://www.sensorwaresystems.com/ historical/resources/sensorweb-concept.pdf.
13. de Marsily, G. 1986. Quantitative hydrogeology: Groundwater hydrology for engineers. Academic Press, San Diego, Californie.
14. Deschamps, A. 2004. Estimation of soil moisture from Radarsat and Envisat data on the Roseau River basin. Canada Centre for Remote Sensing, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa. Rapport interne.
15. Dubois, P.C., Van Zyl, J., et Engman, T. 1995. Measuring soil moisture with imaging radars. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 33, p. 915-926.
16. Entekhabi, D., et Eagleson, P.S. 1989. Land surface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric general circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability. Journal of Climatology, vol. 6, p. 839-857.
17. ESRI, 2002. ArcGIS, version 8.2., Environmental Science Research Institute, Redlands, Californie.
18. Famiglietti, J.S., Rudnicki, J.W., et Rodell, M. 1998. Variability in surface moisture content along a hill slope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 210, p. 25-281.
19. Famiglietti, J.S., Devereaux, J.A., Laymon, C.A., Tsegaye, T., Houser, P.R., Jackson, T.J., Graham, S.T., Rodell, M., et van Oevelen, PJ. 1999. Ground-based investigation of soil moisture variability within remote sensing footprints during the Southern Great Plains 1997 (SGP97) hydrology experiment. Water Resources Research, vol. 35, p. 1839-1851.
20. Franceschetti, G., Iodice, A., Maddaluno, S., et Riccio, D. 2000. A fractal-based theoretical framework for retrieval of surface parameters from electromagnetic backscatter data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 38, p. 641-650.
21. Fung, A.K. 1994. Microwave scattering and emission models and their applications. Artech House, Londres, R.-U.
22. Fung, A.K., et Chen, K.S. 1992. Dependence of the surface backscattering coefficients on roughness, frequency and polarization studies. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 13, p. 1663-1680.
23. Fung, A.K., Li, Z., et Chen, K.S. 1992. Backscattering from arandomly rough dielectric surface. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 30, p. 356-369.
24. Goodrich, D.C., Faurès, J.M., Woolhiser, D.A., Lane, L.J., et Sorooshian, S. 1995. Measurement and analysis of small-scale convective storm rainfall variability. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 173, p. 283-308.
25. Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York.
26. Hu, Z., Islam, S., Cheng, Y. 1997. Statistical characterization of remotely sensed soil moisture images. Remote Sensing Environment, vol. 61, p. 310-318.
27. Isaaks, E.H., Srivastrava, R.M. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. ISSMAP. 2003. Report 2001-2002: Towards integrated earth sensing for resource and environmental monitoring: In situ sensor measurement assimilation program (ISSMAP). Division acquisition de données, Centre canadien de télédétection, Ressources naturelles Canada, Ottawa, Ont. Rapport interne.
29. Jackson, T.J. 1986. Soil water modeling and remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. GE-24, p. 37-46.
30. Jackson, T.J., Schmugge, J., et Engman, E.T. 1996. Remote sensing applications to hydrology: Soil moisture. Hydrological Sciences, vol. 41, p. 517-530.
31. Jackson, T.J., Le Vine, D.M., Hsu A.Y., Oldak, A., Starks, P.J., Swift, C.T., Isham, J.D., et Haken, M. 1999. Soil moisture mapping at regional scales using microwave radiometry: the Southern Great Plains hydrology experiment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 37, p. 2136-2151.
32. e ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, 23-26 juillet 2000, University of Notre Dame, Indiana. CD-ROM Proceedings, paper 140.
33. Johnson, F., Brisco, B., et Brown, R.J. 1993. Evaluation of limits to the performance of the surface roughness meter. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 19, p. 140-145.
34. Justice, C.O., et Townshend, J.R.G. 1981. Integrating ground data with remote sensing. Dans Terrain analysis and remote sensing. Sous la direction de J.R.G. Townshend. George Allen & Unwin, Londres, R.-U., p. 38-58.
35. Kumar, P. 1999. A multiple scale state-space model for characterizing subgrid scale variability of near-surface soil moisture. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 37, p. 182-197.
36. Lee, K. 1975. Ground investigations in support of remote sensing. Dans Manual of remote sensing. Sous la direction de R.G. Reeves. American Society of Photogrammetry, Virginie, p. 805-856.
37. Le Hegarat-Mascle, S., Zribi, M., Alem, F., Weisse, A., et Loumagne, C. 2002. Soil moisture estimation from ERS/SAR data: Toward an operational methodology. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 40, p. 1-12.
38. Lehmann, W. 1995. Anwendung Geostatistischer Verfaren auf die Bodenfeuchte in Ländlichen Einzugsgebieten. Instituts-Mitteilungen, Institut für Hydrologie und Wasserwirtschaft, Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Allemagne.
39. Loague, K. 1992. Soil water content at R-5. Partie 1. Spatial and temporal variability. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 139, p. 233-251.
40. Mattia, F., Davidson, M., Le Toan, T., D’Haese, C., Verhoest, N., Gatti, A., et Borgeaud, M. 2003. A comparison between soil roughness statistics used in surface scattering models derived from mechanical and laser profilers. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41, p. 1659-1671.
41. McNairn, H., Boisvert, J.B., Major, D.J., Gwyn, Q.H.J., Brown, R.J., et Smith, A.M. 1996. Identification of agricultural tillage practices from C-band radar backscatter. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 22, p. 154-162.
42. Mohanty, B.P., Skaggs, T.H., et Famiglietti, J.S. 2000. Analysis and mapping of field-scale soil moisture variability using high resolution, ground-based data during the Southern Great Plains 1997 (SGP97) hydrology experiment. Water Resources Research, vol. 36, p. 1023-1031.
43. o 20546.
44. Nyberg, L. 1996. Spatial variability of soil water content in the covered catchment at Gardsjön, Sweden. Hydrological Processes, vol. 10, p. 89103.
45. Oh, Y., Sarabandi, K., et Ulaby, F.T. 1992. An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 30, p. 370-381.
46. Oh, Y., Sarabandi, K., et Ulaby, F.T. 1994. An inversion algorithm for retrieving soil moisture and surface roughness from polarimetric radar observation. Dans International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 8-12 août 1994, Pasadena, Californie., vol. 3, p. 1582-1584.
47. Peplinski, N.R., Ulaby, F.T., et Dobson, M.C. 1995. Dielectric properties of soils in the 0.3-1.3 GHz range. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 33, p. 803-807.
48. Qui, Y., Fu, B., Wang, J., et Chen, L. 2001. Soil moisture variation in relation to topography and land use in a hill-slope catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 240, p. 243-263.
49. Rao, K.M.M, Kashyap, D., et Chandra, S. 1990. Relative performance of a soil moisture accounting model in estimating return flow. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 115, p. 231-241.
50. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Vogel, G.K., Rigon, R., Entekhabi, D., Castelli, F., et Rinaldo, A. 1995. On the spatial organization of soil moisture fields. Geophyscal Research Letters, vol. 22, p. 2757-2760.
51. Sahebi, M.R., Angles, J., et Bonn, F. 2002. A comparison of multi-polarization and multi-angular approaches for estimating bare soil surface roughness from spaceborne radar data. Canadian Journal ofRemote Sensing, vol. 28, p. 641-652.
52. Sahebi, M.R., Bonn, F., et Bénié, G.B. 2004. Neural networks for the inversion of soil surface parameters from synthetic aperture radar satellite data. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 31, p. 95-108.
53. Seyfried, M.S., et Wilcox, B.P. 1995. Scale and the nature of spatial variability: Field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, vol. 31, p. 173-184
54. o AS97-5001.
55. Shi, J., Wang, J., Hsu, A., O’Neill, P., et Engman, E.T. 1997. Estimation of bare surface soil moisture and surface roughness parameter using L-band SAR image data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 35, p. 1254-1266.
56. Teillet, P.M., Gauthier, R.P., et Chichagov, A. 2002. Towards integrated earth sensing: The role of in situ sensing. Dans First International Workshop on Future Intelligent Earth Observing Satellites (FIEOS), 10-15 novembre 2002, Denver, Colorado. CD-ROM Compte-rendu, article 97.
57. Ulaby, F.T., Cihlar, J., et Moore, R.K. 1974. Active microwave measurement of soil water content. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 31, p. 185-205.
58. Ulaby, F.T., Moore, R.K., et Fung, A.K. 1986. Microwave remote sensing, active and passive. Volume III: From theory to applications. Artech House, Norwood, Mass.
59. Ulmer, G. 2002. Organization techniques in wireless in-situ sensor networks. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA. Disponible à http://users.ece.gatech.edu/-grimace/research/reports/Organization_in_WSNs.pdf [cité juin 2006].
60. Ulmer, G., Yalamanchili, S., et Alkalai, L. 2003. Wireless distributed sensor networks for in-situ exploration of Mars. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgie. Disponible à http://users.ece.gatech.edu/-grimace/ research/reports/nasa_wsn_report.pdf [cité juin 2006].
61. Vinnikov, K.Y., et Robock, A. 1996. Scales of temporal and spatial variability of midlatitude soil moisture. Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 101, p. 7163-7174.
62. Walker, J.P., 1999. Estimating soil moisture profile dynamics from nearsurface soil moisture measurements and standard meteorological data. Thède troisième cycle, Department of Civil, Surveying and Environmental Engineering, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australie.
63. Western, A.W., Bloschl, G., et Grayson, R.B. 1998. Geostatistical Characterization of Soil Moisture Patterns in the Tarrawarra catchment. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 205, p. 20-37.
64. Western, A.W., Grayson, R.B., et Bloschl, G. 2002. Scaling of soil moisture: A hydrologic perspective. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, vol. 30, p. 149-180.
65. Whitaker, M.P.L. 1993. Small-scale spatial variability of soil moisture and hydraulic conductivity in a semi-arid rangeland soil in Arizona. Thèse de deuxième cycle, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson.
66. Wigneron, J.P., Calvet, J.C., Pellarin, T., Van De Grien, A.A., Berger, M., et Ferrazzoli, P. 2003. Retrieving near-surface soil moisture from microwave radiometric observations: Current status and future plans. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 85, p. 489-506.
67. Willmott, C.J. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 63, p. 1309-1313.
68. Zribi, M., et Dechambre, M. 2002. A new empirical model to retrieve soil moisture and roughness from C-band radar data. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 84, p. 42-52.
69. Zribi, M., Ciarletti, V., Taconet, O., Paille, J., et Boissard, P. 2000. Characterization of the soil structure and microwave backscattering based on numerical three-dimensional surface representation: Analysis with a fractional Brownian model. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 72, p. 159-169.
70. Zribi, M., Le Hégarat-Mascle, S., Ottlé, C., Kammoun, B., et Guerin, C. 2003. Surface soil moisture estimation from the synergistic use of the (multiincidence and multi-resolution) active microwave ERS wind scatterometer and SAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 86, p. 30-41.