|
Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 688-689
|
In the era of multislice CT, do we still need leg ultrasonography to diagnose pulmonary embolism?
a,b c,d e |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
D DIMER;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY;
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
ECHOGRAPHY;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
INDIVIDUALIZATION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LEG PHLEBOGRAPHY;
LUNG EMBOLISM;
LUNG SCINTISCANNING;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;
NOTE;
PATIENT CARE;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PREVALENCE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RADIATION EXPOSURE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
BIOLOGICAL MARKERS;
FIBRIN FIBRINOGEN DEGRADATION PRODUCTS;
HUMANS;
LEG;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PHLEBOGRAPHY;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
PULMONARY EMBOLISM;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
VENOUS THROMBOSIS;
|
EID: 55149104775
PISSN: 17434297
EISSN: 17434300
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio1345 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (1)
|
References (8)
|