Steepest ascent for multiple-response applications

Technometrics

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 371-382

  Mee, Robert W ^a   Xiao, Jihua Regina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Desirability function; Optimization; Pareto optimal; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONAL CONSTRAINTS; CONFIDENCE BOUNDS; CONVEX COMBINATIONS; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION; FIRST ORDERS; GRAPHICAL TOOLS; MULTIPLE RESPONSE OPTIMIZATIONS; MULTIPLE RESPONSES; PARETO OPTIMAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACES; SCREENING EXPERIMENTS; SEARCH DIRECTIONS; STANDARD ERROR OF PREDICTIONS; STEEPEST ASCENTS;

FORECASTING; OPTIMIZATION;

SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 55149100042     PISSN: 00401706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/004017008000000271     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1987), Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, New York: Wiley.
2. Box, G. E. P., and Wilson, K. B. (1951), "On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 13, 1-45.
3. Del Castillo, E. (1996), "Multiresponse Process Optimization via Constrained Confidence Regions," Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 61-70.
4. Derringer, G. C., and Suich, R. (1980), "Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables," Journal of Quality Technology, 12, 214-219.
5. Duineveld, C. A. A., Bruins, C. H. P., Smilde, A. K., Bolhuis, G. K., Zuurman, K., and Doornbos, D. A. (1994), "Multicriteria Steepest Ascent," Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 25, 183-201.
6. Harrington, E. C. (1965), "The Desirability Function," Industrial Quality Control, 21, 494-498.
7. Hendriks, M. M. W. B., de Boer, J. H., Smilde, A. K., and Doornbos, D. A.(1992), "Multicriteria Decision Making," Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 16, 175-191.
8. Khuri, A. I., and Conlon, M. (1981), "Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Responses Represented by Polynomial Regression Functions," Technometrics, 23, 363-375.
9. Michaud, F.-T., Parent, V.-A., Garnier, A., and Duchesne, C. (2005), "Letter to the Editor: On the Proper Use of Statistical Design in Experiments," Experimental Hematology, 33, 1271-1272.
10. Myers, R. H., and Montgomery, D. C. (1995), Response Surface Methodology, New York: Wiley.
11. Scheffé, H. (1953), "A Method for Judging All Contrasts in the Analysis of Variance," Biometrika, 40, 87-104.
12. Vindevogel, J., and Sandra, P. (1991), "Resolution Optimization in Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography: Use of Plackett-Burman Statistical Design for the Analysis of Testosterone Esters," Analytical Chemistry, 63, 1530-1536.
13. Weyland, J.W., Bruins, C. H. P., Debets, H. J. G., Bajema, B. L., and Doornbos, D. A. (1983), "Utility Functions as Optimization Criteriafor Separations by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography," Analytica Chimica Acta, 153, 93-101.
14. Yao, C.-L., Chu, I.-M., Hsieh, T.-B., and Hwang, S.-M. (2004), "A Systematic Strategy to Optimize ex vivo Expansion Medium for Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells Derived From Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Cells," Experimental Hematology, 32, 720-727.