Variability driven quality evaluation in software product lines

Proceedings - 12th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 243-252

  Etxeberria, Leire ^a   Sagardui, Goiuria ^a  

^a MONDRAGON UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

DOMAIN ENGINEERINGS; PRODUCT LINES; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; QUALITY EVALUATIONS; QUALITY LEVELS; QUALITY VARIABILITIES; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE EVALUATIONS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

EID: 55049137065     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SPLC.2008.37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Don S. Batory. Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In 9th International Conference on Software Product Lines, SPLC, Proceedings, volume 3714 of LNCS, pages 7-20. Springer, 2005.
2. David Benavides, Pablo Trinidad, and Antonio Ruiz- Cortés. Automated reasoning on feature models. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 17th International Conference, CAiSE, Proceedings, pages 491-503, 2005.
3. Paul Clements, Rick Kazman, and Mark Klein. Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies. Addison-Wesley Professional., January 2002.
4. Paul Clements and Linda Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley Professional., August 2001.
5. Thomas J. Dolan. Architecture Assessment of Information-System Families: a practical perspective. PhD thesis, Tech. Univ. Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2001.
6. Leire Etxeberria and Goiuria Sagardui. Product-line architecture: New issues for evaluation. In 9th International Conference on Software Product Lines, SPLC, Proceedings, volume 3714 of LNCS, pages 174-185. Springer, 2005.
7. Leire Etxeberria and Goiuria Sagardui. Evaluation of quality attribute variability in software product families. In 15th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2008.
8. Leire Etxeberria and Goiuria Sagardui. Quality assessment in software product lines. In 10th International Conference on Software Reuse, ICSR, volume 5030, pages 178-181. Springer, 2008.
9. Leire Etxeberria, Goiuria Sagardui, and Lorea Belategi. Modelling variation in quality attributes. In 1st International Workshop on Variability of Software-Intensive Systems, VaMos, volume Lero Technical report 2007-1. Lero, 2007.
10. E. Folmer, J. Gurp, and J. Bosch. Scenario-based assessment of software architecture usability. In Proceedings of Workshop on Bridging the Gaps Between Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction, ICSE, Portland, 2003.
11. Bruno González-Baixauli, Miguel A. Laguna, and Yania Crespo. Product line requirements based on goals, features and use cases. In International Workshop on Requirements Reuse in System Family Engineering (IWREQFAM), pages 4-7, jun 2004.
12. Bas Graaf, Hylke van Dijk, and Arie van Deursen. Evaluating an embedded software reference architecture: Industrial experience report. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR, pages 354-363. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
13. M. Griss, J. Favaro, and M. d'Alessandro. Integrating feature modeling with the rseb. In 5th International Conference on Software Reuse, ICSR, pages 76-85, 1998.
14. Günter Halmans and Klaus Pohl. Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers. Software and System Modeling, 2(1): 15-36, 2003.
15. K. Henttonen, M. Matinlassi, E. Niemela, and T. Kanstren. Integrability and extensibility evaluation from software architectural models - a case study. The Open Software Engineering Journal, 1:1-20, 2007.
16. Anne Immonen. Software Product Lines, Research Issues in Engineering and Management, chapter A Method for Predicting Reliability and Availability at the Architecture Level, pages 373-122. Springer, 2006.
17. S. Jarzabek, B. Yang, and S. Yoeun. Addressing quality attributes in domain analysis for product lines. IEE Proceedings - Software, 153(2):61-73, 2006.
18. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and S. Peterson. Feature-oriented domain analysis (foda) feasibility study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, 1990.
19. Jia Liu, Don S. Batory, and Srinivas Nedunuri. Modeling interactions in feature oriented software designs. In Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems VIII, ICFI, pages 178-197, 2005.
20. Varvana Myllärniemi, Tomi Männistö, and Mikko Raatikainen. Quality attribute variability within a software product family architecture. In 2nd International Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA), 2006.
21. Eila Niemelä. Architecture centric software family engineering. Product Family Engineering seminars, Helsinki, Finland, 2005.
22. Eila Niemelä and Anne Immonen. Capturing quality requirements of product family architecture. Inf. Softw. Technol., 49(11-12): 1107-1120, 2007.
23. Femi G. Olumofin and Vojislav B. Misic. Extending the atam architecture evaluation to product line architectures. In Proceedings of the 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA, pages 45-56. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
24. SEL Arcade game maker pedagogical product line. Arcade Game Maker Pedagogical Product Line. Web page: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/productlines/ppl/ index.html, 2007.
25. Marco Sinnema, Sybren Deelstra, Jos Nijhuis, and Jan Bosch. Covamof: A framework for modeling variability in software product families. In 3rd International Conference on Software Product Lines, SPLC, Proceedings, pages 197-213, 2004.
26. Lloyd G. Williams and Connie U. Smith. Pasa: a method for the performance assessment of software architectures. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Software and performance, WOSP, pages 179-189. ACM Press, 2002.
27. Hongyu Zhang, Stan Jarzabek, and Bo Yang. Quality prediction and assessment for product lines. In 15th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE, Proceedings, pages 681-695, 2003.