Scale-dependent responses to forest cover displayed by frugivore bats

Oikos

Volumn 117, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1725-1731

  Pinto, Naiara ^a,b   Keitt, Timothy H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BAT; BODY SIZE; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; DIET; FOREST COVER; FRUGIVORY; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HOME RANGE; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MORPHOLOGY;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

ARTIBEUS JAMAICENSIS; CAROLLIA; STURNIRA;

EID: 55049119738     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16495.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Addicott, J. F. et al. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods - scaling environmental patterns Oikos 49 : 340 346.
2. Aldridge, H. D. J. N. Rautenbach, I. L. 1987. Morphology, echolocation and resource partioning in insectivorous bats J. Anim. Ecol. 56 : 763 778.
3. Bernard, E. 2001. Vertical stratification of bat communities in primary forests of central Amazon, Brazil J. Trop. Ecol. 17 : 115 116.
4. Bernard, E. Fenton, M. B. 2003. Bat mobility and roosts in a fragmented landscape in central Amazonia, Brazil Biotropica 35 : 262 277.
5. Betts, M. G. et al. 2006. Independent effects of fragmentation on forest songbirds: an organism-based approach Ecol. Appl. 16 : 1076 1089.
6. Bonaccorso, F. 1979. Foraging and reproductive ecology in a Panamanian bat community Bull. Florida State Mus. Biol. Sci. 24 : 359 408.
7. Cosson, J. F. et al. 1999. Effects of forest fragmentation on frugivorous and nectarivorous bats in French Guiana J. Trop. Ecol. 15 : 515 534.
8. Cressie, N. A. C. 1993. Statistics for spatial data. Wiley.
9. Drielsma, M. et al. 2007. A raster-based technique for analyzing habitat configuration: the cost-benefit approach Ecol. Modell. 202 : 324 332.
10. Emmons, L. H. Feer, F. 1997. Neotropical forest mammals. A field guide. Univ. of Chicago Press.
11. Estrada, A. J. Coates-Estrada, R. 2002. Bats in continuous forest, forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat-island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico Biol. Conserv. 103 : 237 245.
12. Faria, D. 2006. Phyllostomid bats of a fragmented landscape in the north-eastern Atlantic forest, Brazil J. Trop. Ecol. 22 : 531 542.
13. Galindo-Gonzalez, J. et al. 2000. Bat- and bird-generated seed rains at isolated trees in pastures in a tropical rainforest Conserv. Biol. 14 : 1693 1703.
14. Gorresen, P. M. et al. 2005. Multivariate analysis of scale-dependent associations between bats and landscape structure Ecol. Appl. 15 : 2126 2136.
15. Heithaus, E. R. Fleming, T. H. 1978. Foraging movements of a frugivorous bat, Carollia perspicillata (Phyllostomatidae) Ecol. Monogr. 48 : 127 143.
16. Kalko, E. K. et al. 1996. Organization, diversity, and long-term dynamics of a Neotropical bat community Cody, M. Smallwood, J. Long-term studies of vertebrate communities. Acad. Press 503 548.
17. Keitt, T. H. Urban, D. L. 2005. Scale-specific inference using wavelets Ecology 86 : 2497 2504.
18. Kremen, C. et al. 2004. The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California Ecol. Lett. 7 : 1109 1119.
19. Laurance, W. F. et al. 2002. Ecosystem decay of forest fragments: a 22-year investigation Conserv. Biol. 16 : 605 618.
20. Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology Ecology 73 : 1943 1967.
21. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach Cancer Res. 27 : 209 220.
22. Marinho-Filho, J. S. 1991. The coexistence of two frugivorous bat species and the phenology of their food plants in Brazil J. Trop. Ecol. 7 : 59 67.
23. McNab, B. 1963. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size Am. Nat. 97 : 133 140.
24. Minns, C. K. 1995. Allometry of home-range size in lake and river fishes Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52 : 1499 1508.
25. Montiel, S. et al. 2006. Bat assemblages in a naturally fragmented ecosystem in the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico: species richness, diversity and spatio-temporal dynamics J. Trop. Ecol. 22 : 267 276.
26. Morrison, D. W. 1978a. Foraging ecology and energetics of the frugivorous bat Artibeus jamaicensis Ecology 59 : 716 723.
27. Morrison, D. W. 1978b. Influence of habitat on the foraging distances of the fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis J. Mamm. 59 : 622 624.
28. Norberg, U. M. Rayner, J. M. V. 1987. Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 316 : 335 427.
29. Pineda, E. et al. 2005. Frog, bat, and dung beetle diversity in the cloud forest and coffee agroecosystems of Veracruz, Mexico Conserv. Biol. 19 : 400 410.
30. Scheiner, S. M. et al. 2000. Species richness, species-area curves and Simpson's paradox Evol. Ecol. Res. 2 : 791 802.
31. Schulze, M. D. et al. 2000. A comparison of the phyllostomid bat assemblages in undisturbed Neotropical forest and in forest fragments in a slash-and-burn farming mosaic in Peten, Guatemala Biotropica 32 : 174 184.
32. Simmons, N. B. Voss, R. S. 1998. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: a Neotropical rainforest fauna. Part I. Bats Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 237 : 1 219.
33. Soto, M. Gama, L. 1997. Climas González-Soriano, E. Historia natural de Los Tuxtlas. Univ. Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico 7 23.
34. Stockwell, E. F. 2001. Morphology and flight maneuverability in New World leaf-nosed bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) J. Zool. 254 : 505 514.
35. Swihart, R. K. et al. 1988. Relating body size to the rate of home range use in mammals Ecology 69 : 393 399.
36. Verbeylen, G. et al. 2003. Does matrix resistance influence red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecol. 18 : 791 805.
37. Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology Funct. Ecol. 3 : 385 397.
38. Winfree, R. et al. 2005. Testing simple indices of habitat proximity Am. Nat. 165 : 707 717.