Improved hydrogen production by coupled systems of hydrogenase negative photosynthetic bacteria and fermentative bacteria in reverse micelles

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 33, Issue 21, 2008, Pages 6100-6108

  Singh, Anita ^a,c   Misra, Krishna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^c RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citrobacter Y19; Hup mutant; Reverse micelle; Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1; Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; MICELLES; PHOTOBIOLOGICAL HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

CITROBACTER Y19; HUP- MUTANT; REVERSE MICELLES; RHODOBACTER SPHAEROIDES; RHODOPSEUDOMONAS PALUSTRIS;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

EID: 55049113719     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.095     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Billings RE. The hydrogen world view. Washington, DC: American Academy of Science; 1991.
2. Lay JJ. Biohydrogen generation by mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2001;74(4):280-7.
3. Casper MS. Hydrogen manufacture by electrolysis, thermal decomposition, and unusual techniques. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corp.; 1978.
4. Cox KE, Williamson KDJ. Hydrogen: its technology and implications, vol. 4. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc.; 1979.
5. Lodhi MAK. Hydrogen production from renewable sources of energy. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1987;12(7):461-8.
6. Sastri MVC. India's hydrogen energy program - a status report. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1989;14(8):507-13.
7. Markov SA, Bazin MJ, Hall DO. The potential of using cyanobacteria in photobioreactors for hydrogen production. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 1995;52:59-86.
8. Rosen MA, Scott DS. Comparative efficiency assessments for a range of hydrogen production processes. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1998;23(8):653-9.
9. Koku H, Eroǧlu İ, Gündüz U, Yücel M, Türker L. Kinetics of biological hydrogen production by the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U. 001. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2003;28(4):381-8.
10. Benemann JR. Feasibility analysis of photobiological hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1997;22(10-11): 979-87.
11. Greenbaum E. Hydrogen production by photosynthetic water splitting. In: Veziroǧlu TN, Takashashi PK, editors. Hydrogen energy progress VIII. Proceedings eighth WHEC, Hawai. New York: Pergamon Press; 1990. p. 743-54.
12. Sasikala K, Ramana CHV, Rao PR, Kovacs KL. In: Neidleman S, Laskin AI, editors. Anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria: physiology and advances in hydrogen technology. Adv Appl Microbiol 1993;38:211-95. Academic Press.
13. Miyamoto K, Wable O, Benemann JR. Vertical tubular reactor for microalgae cultivation. Biotechnol Lett 1988;10(10):703-8.
14. Tanisho S, Wakao N, Kosako Y. Biological hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes. J Chem Eng Jpn 1983; 16(6)529-30.
15. Ueno Y, Haruta S, Ishii M, Igarashi Y. Characterization of a microorganism isolated from the effluent of hydrogen fermentation by microflora. J Biosci Bioeng 2001; 92(4)397-400.
16. Taguchi F, Hasegawa K, Saito-Taki T, Hara K. Simultaneous production of xylanase and hydrogen using xylan in batch culture of Clostridium sp. strain X53. J Ferment Bioeng 1996; 81(2):178-80.
17. Evvyernie D, Morimoto K, Karita S, Kimura T, Sakka K, Ohmiya K. Conversion of chitinous wastes to hydrogen gas by Clostridium paraputrificum M-21. J Biosci Bioeng 2001;91(4): 339-43.
18. Evvyernie D, Yamazaki S, Morimoto K, Karita S, Kimura T, Sakka K, et al. Identification and characterization of Clostridium paraputrijicum M-21, a chitinolytic, mesophilic and hydrogen-producing bacterium. J Biosci Bioeng 2000; 89(6)596-601.
19. Fißler J, Kohring GW, Giffhorn F. Enhanced hydrogen production from aromatic acids by immobilized cells of Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1995; 44(1):43-6.
20. Nakada E, Asada Y, Arai T, Miyake J. Light penetration into cell suspensions of photo synthetic bacteria and relation to hydrogen production. J Ferment Bioeng 1995;80(1)53-7.
21. Uyar B, Eroǧlu İ, Yücel M, Gündüz U, Türker L. Effect of light intensity, wavelength and illumination protocol on hydrogen production in photobioreactors. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007; 32(18):4670-7.
22. Singh A, Pandey KD, Dubey RS. Enhanced hydrogen production by coupled system of Halobacterium halobium and chloroplast after entrapment within reverse micelles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1999;24(8):693-8.
23. Kelley BC, Meyer CM, Gandy C, Vignais M. Hydrogen recycling by Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. FEES Lett 1977;81(2): 281-5.
24. Vignais PM, Colbeau A, Willison JC, Jouanneau Y. In: Rose A, Tempest D, editors. Hydrogenase, nitrogenase, and hydrogen metabolism in the photo synthetic bacteria. Adv Microbiol Physiol 1985;26:155-234. Academic Press.
25. Khan MMT, Bhatt JP. Photosensitized production of hydrogen by Halobacterium halobium MMT22 coupled to Escherichia coli in reversed micelles of sodium lauryl sulfate in organic solvents. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1991;16(1):9-11.
26. Zabut B, El-Kahlout K, Yücel M, Gündüz U, Türker L, Eroǧlu İ. Hydrogen gas production by combined systems of Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U.001 and Halobacterium salinarum in a photobioreactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006; 31(11):1553-62.
27. Miayke J, Mao XY, Kawamura S. Photoproduction of hydrogen from glucose by a co-culture of a photosynthetic bacterium and Clostridium butyricum. J Ferment Technol 1984; 62(6)531-5.
28. Kaya B, Gündüz U, Eroǧlu Í, Türker L, Yücel M. Hydrogen gas production using combined enzyme systems from E. coli and H. salinarum. In: Veziroglu TN, Winter CJ, Basselt JP, Kresya G, editors. Hydrogen energy progress XI. Proceedings 11th WHEC; 1996. p. 2595-600. Stuttgart, Germany.
29. Kondo T, Arakawa M, Wakayama T, Miyake J. Hydrogen production by combining two types of photosynthetic bacteria with different characteristics. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2002;27(11-12):1303-8.
30. Melis A, Melnicki MR. Integrated biological hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31(11):1563-73.
31. Colbeau A, Kelley BC, Vignais PM. Hydrogenase activity in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata: relationship with nitrogenase activity. J Bacteriol 1980;144(1):141-8.
32. Willison C, Madern D, Vignais PM. Increased photoproduction of hydrogen by non-autotrophic mutants of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Biochem J 1984;219(2):593-600.
33. Das D, Khanna N, Veziroǧlu TN. Recent developments in biological hydrogen production processes. Chem Ind Chem Eng Quart 2008;14(2):57-67.
34. Sistrom WR. The kinetics of the synthesis of photopigments in Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. J Gen Microbiol 1962;28:607-16.
35. 2. Biotechnol Lett 1999; 21(6):525-9.
36. Jung GY, Kim JR, Jung HO, Park JY, Park S. A new chemoheterotrophic bacterium catalyzing water-gas shift reaction. Biotechnol Lett 1999;21(10):869-73.
37. Oh YK, Seol EH, Kim JR, Park S. Fermentative biohydrogen production by a new chemoheterotrophic bacterium Citrobacter sp. Y19. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2003;28(12):1353-9.
38. Clark D, Cronan JE. Escherichia coli mutants with altered control of alcohol dehydrogenase and nitrate reductase. J Bacteriol 1980;141(1):177-83.
39. Colbeau A, Godfroy A, Vignais PM. Cloning of DNA fragments carrying hydrogenase genes of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Biochimie 1986;68(1):147-55.
40. Fodor B, Rakhely G, Kovacs AT, Kovacs KL. Transposon mutagenesis in purple sulfur photosynthetic bacteria: Identification of hypF, encoding a protein capable of processing [NiFe] hydrogenases in α, β, and γ subdivisions of the proteobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67(6):2476-83.
41. Cauvin B, Colbeau A, Vignais PM. The hydrogenase structural operon in Rhodobacter capsulatus contains a third gene, hupM, necessary for the formation of a physiologically competent hydrogenase. Mol Microbiol 1991;5(10):2519-27.
42. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Fan AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin - phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193(1):265-75.
43. Das D, Veziroǧlu TN. Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2001; 26(1): 13-28.
44. Luisi PL. Enzymes hosted in reverse micelles in hydrocarbon solution. Angew Chem Int Ed 1985;24(6):439-50.
45. Singh A. Biological activities of microorganisms in bioremediation and hydrogen production. PhD thesis, University of Allahabad; 2007.
46. Kashyap AK, Pandey KD, Sarkar S. Enhanced hydrogen photoproduction by non-heterocystous cyanobacterium Plectonema boryanum. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1996;21(2):107-9.
47. Rogerson AC. Nitrogen fixing growth by non-heterocystous cyanobacterium Plectonema boryanum. Nature 1980;284:563-4.
48. Barraquio WL, Knowles R. Beneficial effects of nickel on Pseudomonas saccharophila under nitrogen-limited chemolithotrophic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 1989; 55(12):3197-201.
49. 2 photoproduction by Rhodospirilluni rubrum. App Microbiol Biotechnol 1992;37(4):496-500.
50. Daday A, Smith GD. The effect of nickel on the hydrogen metabolism of the cyanobacteria Anabaena cylindrica. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1983;20:327-30.
51. Pedrosa F, Yates M. Effect of chelating agents and nickel ions on hydrogenase activity in Azospirillum brosilense, A. lipoferum and Derxia gummosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1983;17(1-3):101-6.
52. Barbosa MJ, Rocha JMS, Tramper J, Wijffels RH. Acetate as a carbon source for hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria. J Biotechnol 2001;85(1):25-33.
53. 2 accumulation by Rhodobacter sphaeroides KD131 and its uptake hydrogenase and PHB synthase deficient mutant. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31(1):121-7.