A comparison of prospective and retrospective assessment of functional outcome after rotator cuff repair

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 853-859

  Tashjian, Robert Z ^a   Bradley, Michael P ^b   Tocci, Stephen ^c   Henn, Ralph F ^c   Rey, Jesus ^b   Green, Andrew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR; ROTATOR CUFF RUPTURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATOR CUFF;

EID: 55049105682     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (1995), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois
2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (1997), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois
3. Aseltine R.H., Carlson K.J., Fowler F.J., and Barry M.J. Comparing prospective and retrospective measures of treatment outcomes. Med Care 33 (1995) AS67-AS76
4. Beaton D., and Richards R.R. Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7 (1998) 565-572
5. Fischer D., Stewart A.L., Bloch D.A., Lorig K., Laurent D., and Holman H. Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA 282 (1999) 1157-1162
6. Guyatt G.H., Norman G.R., Juniper E.F., and Griffith L.E. A critical look at transition ratings. J Clin Epidemiol 55 (2002) 900-908
7. Guyatt G.H., Townsend M., Berman L.B., and Keller J.L. A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. J Chron Dis 40 (1987) 1129-1133
8. Herrmann D. Reporting current, past, and changed health status: what we know about distortion. Med Care 33 Suppl (1995) AS89-AS94
9. Hudak P.L., Amadio P.C., and Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Am J Ind Med 29 (1996) 602-608
10. Norman G.R., Stratford P., and Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 50 (1997) 869-879
11. Ross M. Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychol Rev 96 (1989) 341-357
12. Schmitt J., and DiFabio R.P. The validity of prospective and retrospective global change criterion measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 (2005) 2270-2276
13. Soohoo N.F., McDonald A.P., Seiler J.G., and McGillivary G.R. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg Am 27 (2002) 537-541
14. Blinded for Review.