www.Accurate information for varicose vein patients.com?

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 90, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 554-556

  Scurr, James R H ^a   Hufton, Alison ^b   Jeffrey, Victoria ^b   Vallabhaneni, S Rao ^a  

^a ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complication; Endovenous ablation; Internet; Varicose veins

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC SCLEROTHERAPY; ENDOVENOUS LASER; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNET; LASER; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NERVE INJURY; PIGMENT DISORDER; POSTOPERATIVE BURN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE THROMBOSIS; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RECURRENT DISEASE; REVIEW; SEARCH ENGINE; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN ULCER; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNITED KINGDOM; VARICOSIS; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; VISUAL DISORDER;

GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; VARICOSE VEINS;

EID: 55049102992     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588408X318219     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Subramonia S, Lees TA. The treatment of varicose veins. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89: 96-100.
2. Campbell B. Varicose veins and their management. BMJ 2006; 333: 287-92.
3. Beale RJ, Gough MJ. Treatment options for primary varicose veins - a review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 30: 83-95.
4. Lindsey B, Campbell WB. Rationing of treatment for varicose veins and use of new treatment methods: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom. EJVES Extra 2006; 12: 19-20.
5. Powell J, Clarke A. The www of the world wide web: who, what, and why? J Med Internet Res 2002; 4: e4. Available at .
6. General Medical Council. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. London: GMC, 1998. Available at .
7. Libertiny G, Perkins JMT, Magee TR, Galland RB. Varicose veins on the Internet. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 20: 386-9.