Mechanical behaviour of a fuel cell stack under vibrating conditions linked to aircraft applications part II: Three-dimensional modelling

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 33, Issue 21, 2008, Pages 6281-6288

  Rouss, Vicky ^a,c   Candusso, Denis ^b,c   Charon, Willy ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE BELFORT MONTBÉLIARD   (France)

^b Institute of Research on Transportation and Safety   (France)

^c France   (France)

Author keywords

Complex mechanical system; Modelling; Neural network; Nonlinear; PEM fuel cell; Vibration

Indexed keywords

DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS; ELECTRIC DRIVES; FUEL CELLS; MECHANICS; MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE FUEL CELLS (PEMFC); TRAINING AIRCRAFT; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

COMPLEX MECHANICAL SYSTEM; EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE; MULTI INPUT AND MULTI OUTPUTS; NONLINEAR; NONLINEAR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS; PEM FUEL CELL; THREE DIMENSIONAL MODELLING; VIBRATION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 55049092548     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.031     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams DE, Randall RJ. Survey of nonlinear detection and identification techniques for experimental vibrations. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on noise and vibration engineering ISMA. Leuven, Belguim; 1998. p. 517-29.
2. Nørgaad M, Ravn O, Poulsen NK, Hansen LK. Neural networks for modelling and control of dynamic systems. Springer-Verlag; 2000.
3. Wei D, Cao G, Zhu X. Modeling and novel adaptive fuzzy neural network control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University 2004;38:1581-6.
4. Jemei S, Hissel D, Péra MC, Kauffmann JM. Dynamical recurrent neural network towards modelling of on-board fuel cell power supply. In: Industrial Electronics-IEEE International Symposium; 2004. p. 471-76.
5. Hatti M, Tioursi M, Nouibat W. A Q-Newton method neural network model for PEM fuel cells. In: Industrial Informatics IEEE International Conference. Corte-Ajaccio, France; 2006. p. 1352-57.
6. Caponetto R, Fortuna L, Rizzo A. Neural network modelling of fuel cell systems for vehicles. In: EFTA, Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Catania, Italy; 2005. p. 1-6.
7. Lee WY, Park GG, Yang TH, Yoon YG, Kim CS. Empirical modeling of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2004;29:961-6.
8. Ou S, Achenie LEK. A hybrid neural network model for PEM fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 2005;140:319-30.
9. Ou S, Achenie LEK. Artificial neural network modelling of PEM fuel cells. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology 2005;2:226-33.
10. Saxena A, Saad A. Evolving an artificial neural network classifier for condition monitoring of rotating mechanical systems. Applied Soft Computing 2007;7:441-54.
11. Xiao Z, Wang S, Zeng H, Yuan X. Identifying of hydraulic turbine generating unit model based on neural networks. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications ISDA. Jinan, China; 2006. p. 113-17.
12. Yilmaz S, Atik K. Modeling of a mechanical cooling system with a variable cooling capacity by using artifical neural network. Applied Thermal Engineering 2007;27:2308-13.
13. Ozerdem MS, Kolukisa S. Artificial neural network approach to predict mechanical properties of hot rolled, nonresulfurized, AISI 10xx series carbon steel bars. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2008;199:437-9.
14. Ciao M, Wang KW, Fujii Y, Tobler WE. Development of a friction component model for automotive powertrain system analysis and shift controller design based on parallel-modulated neural networks. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME 2005;127:382-405.
15. Linchong Y, Guangchen B, Junting J, Lui L. Prediction on nonlinear dynamic responds of non-lubrication mechanism system considered friction and flexibleness based on neural networks. Run Hua Yu Mi Feng/Lubrication Engineering 2006;4:45-7.
16. Zolock J, Greif R. A methodology for the modelling of rail vehicles from time series measurements using time-delay neural networks. In: Proceedings of the ASME rail transportation division fall conference. Chicago, IL; 2007. p. 95-104.
17. Nouria H, Foltete E, Hirsinger L, Ballandras S. Experimental evidence and modeling of microsliding on cantilever quartz beam. In: Proceedings of IEEE ultrasonics symposium. New York, NY; 2007. p. 195-99.
18. Rouss V, Charon W. Multi-input and multi-output neural model of the mechanical nonlinear behaviour of a MEM fuel cell system. Journal of Power Sources 2007;175:1-17.
19. Haber R. Nonlinearity tests for dynamic process. In: Barker HA, Young PC, editors. Proc. IFAC Symp. on identification and system parameter estimation. York, UK; 1985. p. 409-14.
20. He X, Asada H. A new method for identifying orders of input-output models for nonlinear dynamic systems. In: Proc. of the American control conference. San Francisco, California, 1993. p. 2520-23.
21. Haykin S. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall; 1998.
22. Ljung L. System identification - theory for the user. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall; 1999.
23. Marquardt D. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 1963;11:164-8.
24. Fletcher R. Practical methods of optimisation. 2nd ed. Wiley and Sons; 1987.
25. Larsen J, Hansen L. Generalization performance of regularized neural network models. In: Proceeding of the IEEE workshop on neural networks for signal proc. IV. Piscataway, New Jersey; 1994.
26. Le Cun Y, Denker J, Solla S. Optimal brain damage. In: Touretzky DS, editor. Neural information processing systems; 1990. Denver.
27. Hansen LK, Larsen J. Linear unlearning for cross-validation. Advances in Computational Mathematics 1996;5:269-80.
28. Sørensen O. Non-linear pole-placement control with a neural network. European Journal of Control 1996;2:36-43.