Computer-based identification of breast cancer using digitized mammograms

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 499-507

  Acharya U, Rajendra ^a   Ng, E Y K ^b,c   Chang, Y H ^a   Yang, J ^a   Kaw, G J L ^d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^d TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Benign; Breast; Cancer; Digitized mammogram; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERNEL METHOD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 54949158747     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9156-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures, 1999.
2. Bishop, C. M., Neural networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York, NY, 1995.
3. J. W. Byng N. F. Boyd E. Fishell R. A. Jong M. J. Yaffe 1996 Automated analysis of mammographic densities Phys. Med. Biol 41 909 923
4. J. W. Byng M. J. Yaffe R. A. Jong R. S. Shumak G. A. Lockwood M. M. David 1998 Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms Radiographics 18 1587 1598
5. T. C. Cahoon M. A. Sutton J. C. Bezdek 2000 Breast cancer detection using image processing techniques The Ninth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 2 973 976
6. I. Christoyianni E. Dermatas G. Kokkinakis 2000 Fast detection of masses in computer-aided mammography Signal Processing Magazine IEEE 17 1 54 64
7. Gonzalez, R.C., and Wintz, P., Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1987.
8. I. T. Gram Y. Bremnes G. Usin G. Maskarinec N. Bjurstam E. Lund 2005 Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabar's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer Breast Cancer Res 7 854 861
9. R. M. Haralick K. Shanmugam I. Dinstein 1973 Textural features for image Classification IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3 6 610 621
10. http://marathon.csee.usf.edu/Mammography/Database.html [last accessed on 20th July 2007].
11. http://www.medcalc.be/ [last accessed on 20th July 2007].
12. K. Karlikowske G. Grady S. M. Rubin C. Sandrock V. L. Ernster 1995 Efficacy of screening mammography: a meta analysis JAMA 273 149 154
13. F. V. Nelwamondo T. Marwala 2006 Faults Detection Using Gaussian Mixture Models Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients and Kurtosis Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2006. SMC apos;06. IEEE International Conference 1 290 295
14. L. Nystrom I. Andersson N. Bjurstam J. Frisell B. Nordenskjold L. E. Rutqvist 2002 Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials Lancet 359 909 919
15. A. M. Oza N. F. Boyd 1993 Mammography parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk Epidemiol. Rev 15 196 208
16. Parker, J. R., Algorithms for Image Processing and Computer Vision. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997.
17. Parkin, D. M., Muir, C. S., Whelan, S. L., Gao, Y. T., Ferlay, J., Powel, J. (1992) Cancer incidence in Five continence series", Vol. VI. IARC, Scientific Publication, ISBN 9283221206, No 120, IARC, Lyon.
18. D. A. Reynolds 1995 Speaker identification and verification using Gaussian mixture speaker models Speech Comm 17 91 108
19. D. A. Reynolds T. Quatieri R. Dunn 2000 Speaker verification using adapted Gaussian mixture models Digital Signal Process 10 19 41
20. P. K. Saha J. K. Udupa 2001 Optimum image thresholding via class uncertainty and region homogeneity IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell 23 689 706
21. C. Seo K. Y. Lee J. Lee 2001 GMM based on local PCA for speaker identification Electronics Letters 37 1486 1488
22. D. V. Spicer G. Ursin Y. R. Parisky J. G. Pearce D. Shoupe A. Pike M. C. Pike 1994 Changes in mammographic densities induced by a hormonal contraceptive designed to reduce breast cancer risk J. Natl. Cancer Inst 86 431 436
23. Tabar, L., Dean, P. B., Teaching Atlas of Mammography. 2nd edn (Stuttgart: George Thieme), 5-16, 1985.
24. Vibha, L., Harshavardhan, G. M., Pranaw, K., Shenoy, D. P., Venugopal, K. R., Patnaik, L. M. Lesion detection using segmentation and classification of mammograms. Proceedings of the 25th conference on Proceedings of the 25th IASTED International Multi-Conference: artificial intelligence and applications, Austria, 311-316, 2007.
25. T. C. Wang B. K. Nicolaos 1998 Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets IEEE transactions on medical imaging 17 4 498 509
26. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Biennial Report 2004-2005.
27. Yegnanarayana, B., Artificial Neural Networks. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi, 1999.
28. Zaïane, O. R., Antonie, M. L., Coman, A., Mammography classification by an association rule-based classifier. International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining. 2002.