Multicriteria approach to data envelopment analysis

Pesquisa Operacional

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 231-242

  Vieira Jr , Hélcio ^a  

^a INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE AERONÁUTICA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Decision support systems; Environmental studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 54949133721     PISSN: 01017438     EISSN: 16785142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0101-74382008000200004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allen, R.; Athanassopoulos, A.D.; Dyson, R.G. & Thanassoulis, E. (1997). Weights Restrictions and Value Judgments in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, Development and Future Directions. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 13-34.
2. Bana e Costa, C.A.; De Corte, J.-M. & Vansnick, J.C. (2003). MACBETH. LSE OR Working Paper 03.56. London School of Economics, UK.
3. Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
4. Estellita Lins, M.P.; Moreira da Silva, A.C. & Lovell, C.A.K. (2007). Avoiding infeasibility in DEA models with weight restrictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 956-966.
5. Hokkanen, J. & Salminen, P. (1997). Choosing a Solid Waste Management System Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 19-36.
6. Liu, C.C. (2003). Simulating Weights Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis by the Subjective and Objective Integrated Approach. Web Journal of Chinese Management Review, 6(1), 68-78.
7. Olson, D.L. (2001). Comparison of Three Multicriteria Methods to Predict Known Outcomes. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 576-587.
8. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.
9. Salminen, P.; Hokkanen, J. & Lahdelma, R. (1998). Comparing Multicriteria Methods in the Context of Environmental Problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 104, 485-496.
10. Shang, J. & Sueyoshi, T. (1995). A Unified Framework for the Selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System. European Journal of Operational Research, 85, 297-315.
11. Sinuany-Stern, Z.; Mehrez, A. & Hada, Y. (2000). An AHP/DEA Methodology for Ranking Decision Making Units. International Transactions in Operations Research, 7, 109-124.
12. Soares de Mello, J.C.C.B.; Lins, M.P.E.; Soares de Mello, M.H.C.S. & Gomes, E.G. (2002). Evaluating the performance of calculus using operational research tools. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 209-218.
13. Takamura, Y. & Tone, K. (2003). A Comparative Site Evaluation Study for Relocating Japanese Government Agencies Out of Tokyo. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37, 85-102.
14. Thompson, R.G.; Langemeier, L.N.; Lee, C.T. & Thrall, R.M. (1990). The Role of Multiplier Bounds in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93-108.
15. Thompson, R.G.; Singleton, F.D.; Thrall, R.M. & Smith, B.A. (1986). Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas. Interfaces, 16, 35-49.
16. Wong, Y.-H.B. & Beasley, J.E. (1990). Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(9), 829-835.