Specificity of non-structural protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of serum antibodies against foot -and-mouth disease virus in a target population in New Zealand

New Zealand Veterinary Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 227-232

  Kittelberger, R ^a   Mackereth, G F ^a   Sewell, M ^a   Keall, J ^a   Clough, R ^a   Pigott, C ^a   O'Keefe J S ^a  

^a Ministry for Primary Industries   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Diagnostic sensitivity; Diagnostic specificity; ELISA; Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; Foot and mouth disease; Parallel testing; Serial testing

Indexed keywords

VIRUS ANTIBODY; VIRUS PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; HEALTH SURVEY; IMMUNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; NEW ZEALAND; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEEP; SHEEP DISEASE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STANDARD; SWINE; SWINE DISEASE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, VIRAL; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; NEW ZEALAND; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE; SHEEP; SHEEP DISEASES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES; VIRAL NONSTRUCTURAL PROTEINS;

ANIMALIA; BOS; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; OVIS ARIES; SUIDAE;

EID: 54949131353     PISSN: 00480169     EISSN: 11760710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2008.36838     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anonymous. Operation Waiheke: Swift response reassures trading partners. Biosecurity 60, 4–5, 2005
2. Anonymous. Guidelines for the Surveillance of Foot- and- Mouth Disease. OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Appendix 3.8.7. World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris, France, 2007
3. Anonymous. Technical Response Policies for Foot- and- Mouth Disease. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, NZ, 2008
4. Bergmann IE, Malirat V, Neitzert E, Beck E, Panizzutti N, Sanchez C, Falczuk A. Improvement of a serodiagnostic strategy for foot- and- mouth disease virus surveillance in cattle under systematic vaccination: a combined system of an indirect ELISA-3ABC with an enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay. Archives ofVirology 145, 473–89, 2000
5. Brocchi E, Bergmann IE, Dekker A, Paton DJ, Sammin DJ, Greiner M, Grazioli S, De Simone F, Yadin H, Haas B, Bulut N, Malirat V, Neitzert E, Goris N, Parida S, Sorensen K, De Clercq K. Comparative evaluation of six ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins of foot- and- mouth disease virus. Vaccine 24, 6966–79, 2006
6. Bronsvoort BM de C, Sorensen KJ, Anderson J, Corteyn A, Tanya VN, Kitching RP, Morgan KL. Comparison of two 3ABC enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosis of multiple-serotype foot- and- mouth disease in a cattle population in an area of endemicity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 2108–14, 2004
7. Buschmann A, Ziegler U, Groschup MH. Standardization of BSE rapid test performances and experiences gathered during the implementation of large-scale testing. Accreditation and Quality Assurance: Journal for Quality, Comparability and Reliability in Chemical Measurement 9, 191–7, 2004
8. Daly LE. Simple SAS macros for the calculation of exact binomial and Poisson confidence limits. Computers in Biology and Medicine 22, 351–61, 1992
9. De Diego M, Brocchi E, Mackay D, De Simone F. The non-structural polyprotein 3ABC of foot- and- mouth disease virus as a diagnostic antigen in ELISA to differentiate infected from vaccinated cattle. Archives of Virology 142, 2021–33, 1997
10. Dohoo I, Martin S, Stryhn H. Screening and diagnostic tests. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. Pp 85–120. AVC Inc, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, 2003
11. Everest SJ, Thorne L, Barnicle DA, Edwards JC, Elliott H, Jackman R, Hope J. Atypical prion protein in sheep brain collected during the British scrapie-surveillance programme. Journal of General Virology 87, 471–7, 2006
12. Gardner IA, Stryhn H, Lind P, Collins MT. Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 45, 107–22, 2000
13. Georgiev G, Veleva E, Polihoronova L, Rossi A. Using NSP ELISA (Chekit-FMD-3ABC Bommeli-Intervet) as a Tool for FMD Serosurveillance in Bulgaria. App. 72, 2004. Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of EUFMD, Chania, Crete, Greece, 2004
14. Jacobson R. Principles of validation of diagnostic assays for infectious diseases. OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Pp 34–45. Organisation International des Épizooties, Paris, France, 2008
15. Kitching RP, Barnett PV, Paton D, Mackay D. Foot- and- mouth disease. OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Pp 190–217. Organisation International des Épizooties, Paris, France, 2008
16. Mackay DKJ. Differentiating infection from vaccination in foot- and- mouth disease-summary and conclusions of the final meeting of concerted action CT93 0909. Veterinary Quarterly 20 (Supplement), 2–5, 1998
17. Moonen P, Linde Ev d, Chénard G, Dekker A. Comparable sensitivity and specificity in three commercially available ELISAs to differentiate between cattle infected with or vaccinated against foot- and- mouth disease virus. Veterinary Microbiology 99, 93–101, 2004
18. Pharo HJ. Foot- and- mouth disease: an assessment of the risks facing New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 50, 46–55, 2002
19. Polak MP, Larska M, Rozek W Zmundzinski JF. Usefulness of rapid tests for diagnosis of BSE. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 47, 89–93, 2003
20. Sanson RL. The epidemiology of foot- and- mouth disease: Implications for New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 42, 41–53, 1994
21. Stone M. Quarterly report of investigations and suspected exotic diseases. Surveillance 32 (3), 16, 2005
22. Sutmoller P, Barteling SS, Olascoaga RC, Sumption KJ. Control and eradication of foot- and- mouth disease. Virus Research 91, 101–44, 2003
23. Tana T, Holder P. Arbovirus surveillance programme. Surveillance 34 (2), 10–11, 2007