Spatial dependencies in wind-related housing damage

Natural Hazards

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 317-330

  Silva, Dakshina G ^a   Kruse, Jamie B ^b   Wang, Yongsheng ^c  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Fujita Scale; Housing damage; Spatial dependence; Tornado

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; INSURANCE SYSTEM; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; TORNADO;

NORTH AMERICA; OKLAHOMA [OKLAHOMA (STT)]; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 54949105080     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-008-9221-y     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
2. Anselin L, Bera AK (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah A, Giles DEA (eds) Handbook of applied economic statistics. Marcel Dekker, New York
3. ASCE Standard-Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (2002) American Society of Civil Engineers
4. Cho S, Gordon P, Richardson HR, Moore JE II, Shinozuka M (2000) Analyzing transportation reconstruction network strategies: A full cost approach. Rev Urban Region Dev Stud 12(3):212-227
5. De Silva DG, Kruse JB, Wang Y (2006) Catastrophe-induced destruction and reconstruction. Nat Hazards Rev 7(1):19-25
6. Ewing BT, Kruse JB, Thompson MA (2003) Labor market responses to tornadoes. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on wind engineering, Lubbock, TX
7. Fronstin P, Holtmann AG (1994) The determinants of residential property damage caused by hurricane Andrew. South Econ J 61(2):387-397
8. Fujita TT (1971) A proposed characterization of tornadoes and hurricanes by area and intensity. SMRP Paper 91(42), University of Chicago
9. Golden JH, Snow JT (1991) Mitigation against extreme windstorms. Rev Geophys 29(4):477-504
10. Greene WH (1997) Econometric analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
11. Kawawaki Y, Ota M (1996) The influence of the great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake on the local housing market. Rev Urban Region Dev Stud 8:220-233
12. Kruse JB, Simmons K, Tiglioglu T (1999) Nashville tornado-economic damage estimation using tax assessor and insurance data. In: Larsen A, Larose GL, Livesey FM (eds) Wind engineering into the 21st century. Brookfield Publication, A. A. Balkema/Rotterdam
13. LeSage JP (1999) Spatial econometrics. http://www.spatial-econometrics.com (Data retrieved in May 2003)
14. Marshall TP (2002) Damage survey at Moore, Oklahoma Tornado. Weather Forecast 17(3):582-598
15. Marshall TP, Foster M (2002) Damage survey and radar analysis of the Forth Worth and Arlington, TX tornadoes on 28 March 2000. In: Proceedings 21st conference on severe local storms, San Antonio, TX
16. McDonald JR, Selvam P (1990) The West Memphis, Arkansas tornado of December 14, 1987. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 6:279-287
17. Meade C, Abbott M (2003) Assessing federal research and development for hazard loss reduction. Prepared for the White House Office of Science Technology and Policy, RAND, Santa Monica, CA
18. Merrell D, Simmons KM, Sutter D (2002a) The market for tornado safety: analysis of applications to the Oklahoma saferoom initiative. J Econ 28(1):35-50
19. Merrell D, Simmons KM, Sutter D (2002b) Taking shelter: Estimating the safety benefits of tornado safe rooms. Weather Forecast 17:619-625
20. O'Sullivan A (2003) Urban economics. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston
21. Phan LT, Simiu E (1999) The Fujita Intensity Scale: A reassessment from structural engineering perspective. Proceedings of 31st joint meetings wind and seismic effects. US/Japan Natural Resources Development Program, Tsukuba, Japan, pp 469-474
22. Simmons KM, Kruse JB (2000) Market value of mitigation and perceived risk: Empirical results. J Econ 26(1):41-51
23. Simmons KM, Kruse JB, Smith D (2002) Valuing mitigation: Real estate market response to Hurricane loss reduction measures. South Econ J 68(3):660-671