The conscience debate: Resources for rapprochement from the problem's perceived source

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 151-160

  Hardt, John J ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Catholic; Conscience; Ends of medicine; MacIntyre; Moral integrity; Patient autonomy; Patient rights; Physician rights

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSCIENCE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; PATIENT RIGHT; PHYSICIAN RIGHT;

CATHOLICISM; CONSCIENCE; ETHICS, CLINICAL; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PATIENT RIGHTS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REFUSAL TO TREAT;

EID: 54949092398     PISSN: 13867415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11017-008-9073-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Charo, Alta. 2005. The celestial fire of conscience. The New England Journal of Medicine 352 (24): 2741-2743.
2. Watt, Helen, ed. 2005. Cooperation, complicity and conscience: Problems in healthcare, science, law and public policy. London: The Linacre Center.
3. Pellegrino, Edmund. 2002. The physician's conscience, conscience clauses, and religious belief: A Catholic perspective. Fordham Urban Law 30: 221-244.
4. Flannery, Austin, ed. 1996. Gaudium et Spes. In Vatican Council II: The basic sixteen documents. Northport, New York: Costello Publishing Company, Inc.
5. Savulescu, Julian. 2006. Conscientious objection in medicine. British Medical Journal 332 (4): 294-297.
6. Aquinas, Thomas. 1948. Summa Theologica, vol. I, Q. 79, A. 13 (trans: Fathers of the English Dominican Province). New York: Benziger Bros.
7. Mahoney, John. 1987. The making of moral theology: A study of the Roman Catholic tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. McCabe, Herbert. 1986. Aquinas on good sense. New Blackfriars 67 (798): 419-431.
9. Ratzinger, Joseph. 2006. On conscience. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
10. Hanson, Mark J., and Daniel Callahan, eds. 1999. The goals of medicine: The forgotten issues in health care reform. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
11. Pellegrino, Edmund. 2001. Philosophy of medicine: Should it be teleological or socially construed? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (2): 169-180.
12. Wildes, Kevin. 2001. The crisis of medicine: Philosophy and the social construction of medicine. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1): 71-86.
13. Elliott, Carl. 2003. Better than well. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
14. McKenny, Gerald. 1997. To relieve the human condition: Bioethics, technology and the body. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15. Hardt, John J. 2007. The necessity of conscience. The American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6): 18-19.
16. Jonsen, Albert R., and Stephen Toulmin. 1989. The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Hardt, John J. 2008. Some thoughts on conscience in the delivery of Catholic health care. Health Care Ethics USA 6 (1): 2-4.
18. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Social structures and their threats to moral agency. Philosophy 74: 311-329.
19. Sulmasy, Daniel P. 2008. What is conscience and why is respect for it so important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. doi: 10.1007/ s11017-008-9072-2
20. Vischer, Robert K. 2006. Conscience in context: Pharmacist rights and the eroding moral marketplace. Stanford Law & Policy Review 17 (1): 83-119.