Radiotherapy in rectal cancer: Is it time for change? A qualitative analysis of the national questionnaire survey of members of ACPGBI on preliminary CRO7 results

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 873-878

  Srinivasaiah, N ^a   Monson, J R ^a  

^a CASTLE HILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ACPGBI; Neoadjuvant radiotherapy; Outcomes; Questionnaire survey; Rectal cancer; Themes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTUM CANCER; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL SURGERY; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RECTAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 54949087898     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01500.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Srinivasaiah N, Joseph B, Mackey P, Monson JR. How do we manage early rectal cancer? A national questionnaire survey among members of the ACPGBI after the preliminary results of the MRC CR07/NCIC CO16 randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 2007; Aug 31; PMID: 17764532.
2. Allery LA, Owen PA, Robling MR. Why general practitioners and consultants change their clinical practice: A critical incident study. Bmj 1997; 314: 870-4.
3. Cosby JL. (2005) Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. Elsevier, Oxford, p. 290.
4. Poses RM. Conclusions about why doctors change their practice were not supported by the data. BMJ 1997; 314: 1908.
5. Morse JM. (1994) Emerging from the data: The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In: Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods (ed Morse JM), pp. 23-43. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
6. Thorne S. Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2000; 3: 68-70.
7. Medical Research Council. Preliminary results of CRO7 trial. J Clin Oncol 2003; 6 (Suppl. 18): S3511.
8. Haynes B, Haines A. Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. BMJ 1998; 317: 273-6.
9. Stein LS. The effectiveness of continuing medical education: Eight research reports. J Med Educ 1981; 56: 103-10.
10. Haynes RB, Davis DA, McKibbon A, Tugwell P. A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education. JAMA 1984; 251: 61-4.
11. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1992; 268: 1111-7.
12. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995; 274: 700-5.
13. Wergin JF MP, Miller WW, Papp KK, Williams WL. CME and change in practice: An alternative perspective. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1988; 8: 147-59.
14. Graham I. I believe therefore I practise. Lancet 1996; 347: 4-5.
15. Fox RD, Maxmanian P, Putnam RW. (1989) Changing and Learning in the Lives of Physicians. Praeger, New York.
16. Kerr DN, Jones SA, Easmon CS. Continuing medical education: Experience and opinions of consultants. BMJ 1993; 306: 1398-402.