A telecommunications intervention for frontier patients with diabetes

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 793-800

  Wagnild, Gail ^a   MacCart, John G ^b   Mitchell, Scot ^b   Tyabah, Kiran ^b   Leenknecht, Cindy ^c   Meszaros, Jane Fitch ^d  

^a Friends Research Institute Inc   (United States)

^b Wheatland Memorial Healthcare   (United States)

^c PARTNERS IN HEALTH   (United States)

^d St Vincent Healthcare   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Diabetes self management; Frontier patients

Indexed keywords

BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT; TELECOMMUNICATION;

DIABETES; DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; FRONTIER PATIENTS; MONITORING BEHAVIORS; SELF-MANAGEMENT;

TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR; EMOTIONAL STABILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRETEST POSTTEST CONTROL GROUP DESIGN; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; TELECOMMUNICATION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TELECOMMUNICATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 54849442889     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0133     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Centers for Disease control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: diabetes: disabling, deadly, and on the rise [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease control and Prevention; 2005 [cited September 6, 2007]. Available from: http://www.apps.nccd.cdc.gov/ddtstrs/FactSheet.aspx (Last accessed September 6, 2007).
2. Montana County Health Profiles. [Internet]. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services; 2004 [cited September 6, 2007]. Available from: http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/PHSD/health-profiles/healthprofiles-index.shtml (Last accessed September 6, 2007).
3. Mensing C, Boucher J, Cypress M, Weinger K, Mulcahy K, Barta P, Hosey G, Kopher W, Lasichak A, Lamb B, Mangan M, Norman J, Tanja J, Yauk L, Wisdom K, Adams C. Task Force to Review and Revise the National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Programs. Diabetes Care 2000;23:682-689.
4. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations for healthcare system and self-management education interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality from diabetes. Am J Prev Med 2002;22:10- 14.
5. Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jack L, Snyder SR, Carande-Kulis VG, Isham G, Garfield S, Briss P, McCulloch D. Increasing diabetes self-management education in community settings: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002;22(4 suppl):39-66.
6. Balamurugan A, Rivera M, Jack L Jr, Allen K, Morris S. Barriers to diabetes self-management education programs in underserved rural Arkansas: Implications for program evaluation. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2006 Jan [cited September 7]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/ issues/2006/jan/05_0129.htm (Last accessed September 7, 2007).
7. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986.
8. UK Prospective diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837-853.
9. Nagelkerk J, Reick K, Meengs L. Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management. J Adv Nurs 2006;54:151- 158.
10. Tu KS, Morrison E. Diabetes selfcare practices, barriers, and outcomes in an indigent population: An exploratory study. J Nurs Sci 1996;1:88-98.
11. Williamson AR, Hunt AE, Pope JF, Tolman NM. Recommendations of dietitians for overcoming barriers to dietary adherence in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2002;26:272-278.
12. Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Schafer LC. Barriers to regimen adherence among persons with insulin dependent diabetes. J Behav Med 1984;9:65-77.
13. Lewin K. Dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1935.
14. Lewin K. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row, 1951.
15. Lawton MP. Competence, environmental press and the adaptation of older people. In: MP Lawton MP, Windley PG, Byerts TO, eds. Aging and the environment. New York: Springer, 1982.
16. Moos RH. Evaluating treatment environments: A social ecological approach. New York: Wiley, 1974.
17. Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and validation of the Diabetes Care Profile. Eval Health Prof 1996;19:209-231.
18. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Gruppen LD, Funnell MM, Oh MS. The diabetes empowerment scale-short form (DES-SF). Diabetes Care 2003;26:1641- 1643.
19. Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965;12:63-70.
20. Fitzgerald JT, Anderson FM, Funnell MM, Hiss RG, Hess GE, Davis WK, Barr PA. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care 1998;21:706-710.