Reproducing the Piper trilinear diagram in rectangular coordinates

Ground Water

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 893-896

  Ray, Ranjan Kumar ^a   Mukherjee, Rumi ^a  

^a CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSES; CHHATTISGARH; ESSENTIAL FEATURES; GRAPHICS PACKAGES; PIPER TRILINEAR DIAGRAMS; RECTANGULAR COORDINATES; SAMPLE DATUM; SPECIALIZED SOFTWARES;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS;

WATER;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DATA SET; DIAGRAM; GRAPHICAL METHOD; WATERSHED;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INDIA; PIPERACEAE; WATER SUPPLY;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INDIA; PIPER; WATER; WATER SUPPLY;

ASIA; CHHATTISGARH; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

PIPERACEAE;

EID: 54849441464     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00471.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Back, W. 1966. Hydrochemical facies and groundwater flow patterns in northern part of Atlantic Coastal Plain. USGS Professional Paper 498-A. Washington D.C. : USGS.
2. Chadha, D.K. 1999. A proposed new diagram for geochemical classification of natural waters and interpretation of chemical data. Hydrogeology Journal 7, no. 5 : 431 439.
3. Chebotarev, I.I. 1955a. Metamorphism of natural waters in the crust of weathering-1. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 8, no. 1-2 : 22 32.
4. Chebotarev, I.I. 1955b. Metamorphism of natural waters in the crust of weathering-2. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 8, no. 3 : 137 170.
5. Chebotarev, I.I. 1955c. Metamorphism of natural waters in the crust of weathering-3. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 8, no. 4 : 198 212.
6. Durov, S.A. 1948. Natural waters and graphic representation of their compositions. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 59, 87 90.
7. Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice Hall Inc.
8. Güler, C., G.D. Thyne, J.E. McCray, and A.K. Turner. 2002. Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeology Journal 10, no. 4 : 455 474.
9. Hill, R.A. 1940. Geochemical patterns in the Coachella valley, California. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 21, 46 49.
10. Langelier, W.F., and H.F. Ludwig. 1942. Graphical methods for indicating the mineral character of natural waters. American Water Works Association Journal 34, 335 352.
11. Piper, A.M. 1944. A graphic procedure in geochemical interpretation of water analyses. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 25, 914 923.
12. Rollinson, H.R. 1993. Using Geochemical Data: Evaluation, Presentation, Interpretation. Essex, U.K Longman Scientific & Technical.
13. Romani, S. 1981. A new diagram for classification of natural waters and interpretation of chemical analysis data. In Proceedings of Quality of Ground Water International Symposium, Noordwijkerhout. Studies in Environmental Science 17. Amsterdam, The Netherlands : Elsevier.
14. Shikaze, S.G., and A.S. Crowe. 2007. An Excel macro for generating trilinear plots. Ground Water 45, no. 1 : 106 109.
15. Zaporozac, A. 1972. Graphical interpretation of water-quality data. Ground Water 10, no. 2 : 32 43.