Legal aspects of biobanks;La disciplina giuridica delle biobanche

Pathologica

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 86-115

  Macilotti, Matteo ^a   Izzo, U ^a   Pascuzzi, G ^a   Barbareschi, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b SANTA CHIARA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biobanking; Biological tissue conservation; Legal aspects; Tissue banks; Tissue cryopreservation

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYTOLOGY; DRUG RESEARCH; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FAMILY RELATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL SERVICE; HUMAN DIGNITY; HUMAN GENOME; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; LAW; LIVING DONOR; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PATERNITY; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; QUALITY CONTROL; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; REGISTRATION; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; SPECIES CULTIVATION; SPERM PRESERVATION; STANDARDIZATION; TISSUE PRESERVATION;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CONFIDENTIALITY; DATABASES, GENETIC; DNA; EUROPE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNATIONALITY; ITALY; OWNERSHIP; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TRUST;

EID: 54749126620     PISSN: 00312983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Andrews L, Nelkin D. Il mercato del corpo. Il commercio dei tessuti umani nell'era biotecnologia. 2002.
2. Andrews L, Nelkin D. Homo economicus. The commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology. Hastings Cent Rep 1998;30.
3. Ashburn TT, Wilson SK, Eisenstein BI. Human tissue research in the genomic era of medicine: balancing individual and societal interests. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:3377.
4. Boggio A. Charitable trust and human genetic databases: the way forward? Genomics Soc Policy 2005;41.
5. Boulier W. Sperm, spleens and other valuables: the need to recognize property rights in human body parts. Hofstra Law Rev 1995;23:693.
6. Budds BB. Toward a just model of alienability of human tissue. USF Law Rev 2003;37:757.
7. Calabresi G. Do we own our bodies. Health Matrix 1991;5:1.
8. Calabresi G. An introduction to legal thought: four approaches to law and the allocation of body parts. Stan Law Rew 2003;55:2113.
9. Caplan AL, Elger BS. Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks. 7 Embo reports, 661, 2006.
10. Charo R. Alta, skin and bones: post-mortem markets in human tissue. Nova Law Rev 2002;26:421.
11. Cherubini MC. Tutela della salute ed atti di disposizione del corpo. In: Busnelli FD, Breccia U, eds. Tutela della salute e diritto privato. Milano: 1978, p. 94.
12. Criscuoli G. L'acquisto delle parti staccate del proprio corpo e gli art. 820-821 c.c. Riv Dir Fam 1985;XIV:266.
13. D'Addino Serravalle P. Atti di disposizione del corpo e tutela della persona umana. Camerino-Napoli: Esi 1983.
14. De Cupis A. I diritti della personalità. In: Cicu A, Messineo F, eds. Trattato di diritto civile e commerciale. Milano: 1985, p. 159 e ss.
15. Dogliotti M. Atti di disposizione sul proprio corpo e teoria contrattuale. Rass Dir Civ 1990;291.
16. Fenwick P, Beran RG. Informed consent - should bolan be rejected? Med Law 1997;16:215.
17. Gitter Donna M. Ownership of human tissue: a proposal for federal recognition of human research participants' property rights in their biological materia. Wash Lee Law Rev 2004;61:257.
18. Gottlieb K. Human biological samples and the laws of property: the trust as a model for biological repositories. In: Weir RF, ed. Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal and Public Policy Implications. University of Iowa Press 1998.
19. Greely T. Informed consent and other ethicla issues in human population genetic. Ann Rev Genet 2001;35.
20. Greely T. Breaking the stalemate: a prospective regulatory framework for unforeseen research uses of human tissue samples and health information. Wake Forest Law Rev 1999;737:34.
21. Guariniello R. Informazioni genetiche e riservatezza. Riflessi sul mondo del lavoro. Bioetica 2002;671.
22. Hardin H. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968;162:1243.
23. Harrison H. Neither moore nor the market: alternative models for compensating contributors of human tissue. Am J Law Med 2002;77:28.
24. Herring J, Chau PL. My body, your body, our body. Med Law Rev 2007;34:15.
25. Hoffman S. There a pink slip in your genes? Genetic discrimination in employment and in health insurance. J Law Health 2002;47:16.
26. Kegley AK. Challenges to informed consent. Emb Rep 2004;832:5.
27. Knoppers BM, Saginur M. The Babel of genetic data terminology. Nat Biotechnol 2005;925:23.
28. Laurenzo BJ, De Paul JD. Does patient-donor have implied right to share in profits resulting from research using tissue or blood parts? HOSPLW 1988;21:55.
29. Leachman M. Regulation of the human tissue industry: a call for fast-track regulations. Law Rev 2004;443:65.
30. Liddell K, Hall A. Beyond Bristol and Alder Hey: the future regulation of human tissue. Med Law Rev 2005;170:13.
31. Mason JK, Laurie GT. Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey. Mod Law Rev 2006;711:64.
32. Marshall E. Whose DNA is it, aniway? Science 1997;178:564.
33. Morelli TE. Genetic discrimination by insurers: legal protections needed from abuse of biotechnology. Health Span 1992;8:9.
34. Nicoll RB. Comment: long-term care insurance and genetic discrimination - get it while you're young and ignorant: an examination of current discriminatory problems in long-term care insurance through the use of genetic information. Alb Law J Sci Tech 2003;13:751.
35. O'Flaherty NF. FDA's new regulatory scheme for human cell and tissue products. HOSPLW 2002;493:35.
36. Paganelli M. Alla volta di Frankestein: biotecnologie e proprietà di parti del corpo. Foro It 1989;417.
37. Perlingeri P. La personalità umana nell'ordinamento giuridico. Napoli: Esi 1972, p. 314.
38. Piria C. Gli interessi scientifici e patrimoniali su parti staccate dal corpo oggetto di ricerche biotecnologiche. Rass Dir Farm 1990;XXI:808.
39. Rao R. Property, privacy and the human body. Buff Law Rev 2000;80:359.
40. Roche PA. The genetics revolution: conflicts, challenges and conundra: article: the genetic revolution at work: legislative efforts to protect employees. Am J Law Med 2002;28:271.
41. Rodotà S. Ipotesi sul corpo giuridificato, in Rodotà S, Tecnologia e diritti. Bologna: Il Mulino 1995.
42. Rodotà S. La vita e le regole. Tra diritto e non diritto. Feltrinelli 2006.
43. Rothstein MA, Betsy DG, Steven GC. Protecting genetic privacy by permitting employer access only to job-related employee medical information: analysis of a unique Minnesota Law. Am J Law Med 1998;24:399.
44. Rothstein MA. Genetic privacy and confidentiality: why they are so hard to protect. J Law Med Ethics 1998;198:26.
45. Rothstein MA. The use of genetic information for nonmedical purposes. J Law Health 1995;109:9.
46. Santuosso A. Corpo e libertà. Una storia tra diritto e scienza. Milano: Cortina 2001.
47. Sommaggio P. Il dono preteso. Padova 2004.
48. Suter S. Disentangling privacy from property: toward a deeper understanding of genetic privacy. Georg Wash Law Rew 2004;72:737.
49. Tallacchini M. Retorica dell'anonimia e proprietà dei materiali bilogici unumi. In: D'Agostino F, ed. Corpo esibito, corpo violato, corpo venduto, corpo donato. Milano: 2003.
50. Wells MA. Overview of FDA regulation of human cellular and tissue-based products. Food Drug Law J 1997;52:401.
51. Winickoff DE, Neumann BL. Towards a social contract for genomics: property and the public in the 'biotrust' model. Genom Soc Policy 2005;3:8.
52. Winickoff DE, Winickoff RN. The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1180.
53. Williams MO. The regulation of human tissue in the united states: a regulatory and legislative analisys. Food Drug Law J 1997;52:409.
54. Zodrow J. The commodification of human body parts: regulating the tissue bank industry. Sw Univ Law Rev 2003;40:732.