Voting green

Social Science Quarterly

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1121-1135

  Coan, Travis G ^a   Holman, Mirya R ^a,b  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54749108272     PISSN: 00384941     EISSN: 15406237     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00564.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alm, Leslie R. Stephanie L. Witt. 1997 The Rural-Urban Linkage to Environmental Policy Making in the American West: A Focus on Idaho Social Science Journal 34 (3) : 271 84.
2. Bowler, Shaun Todd Donovan. 1994 Information and Opinion Change on Ballot Propositions Political Behavior 16 (4) : 411 35.
3. Calvert, Jerry. 1979 The Social and Ideological Bases for Support for Environmental Legislation: An Examination of Public Attitudes and Legislative Action Western Political Quarterly 32 (3) : 327 37.
4. Davis, Frank Albert Wurth. 2003 Voting Preferences and the Environment in the American Electorate: The Discussion Extended Society and Natural Resources 16 (8) : 729 40.
5. Deacon, Robert Perry Shapiro. 1975 Private Preferences for Collective Goods Revealed Through Voting on Referenda American Economic Review 65 : 943 55.
6. Dunlap, Riley, Chenyang Xiao Aaron M. McCright. 2001 Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism Environmental Politics 10 (4) : 23 48.
7. Fischel, William. 1979 Determinants of Voting on Environmental Quality: A Study of a New Hampshire Pulp Mill Referendum Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 6 : 107 18.
8. Guber, Deborah. 2001 Voting Preferences and the Environment in the American Electorate Society and Natural Resources 6 (1) : 455 69.
9. Howell, Susan Shirley Laska. 1992 The Changing Face of the Environmental Coalition: A Research Note Environmental and Behavior 24 (1) : 134 44.
10. Howell-Moroney, Michael. 2004 What Are the Determinants of Open-Space Ballot Measures? An Extension of the Research Social Science Quarterly 85 (1) : 169 79.
11. Jones, Robert Riley Dunlap. 1992 The Social Bases for Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time? Rural Sociology 57 (1) : 28 47.
12. Kahn, Matthew. 2002 Demographic Change and the Demand for Environmental Regulation Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (1) : 45 55.
13. Kahn, Matthew John Matsusaka. 1997 Demand for Environmental Goods: Evidence from Voting Patterns on California Initiatives Journal of Law and Economics 40 (1) : 137 73.
14. King, Gary. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
15. Kotchen, Matthew Shawn Powers. 2006 Explaining the Appearance and Success of Voter Referenda for Open-Space Conservation Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52 : 373 90.
16. Leip, David. 2006. David Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Available at 〈 〉.
17. Lowe, George Thomas Pinhey. 1982 Rural-Urban Differences in Support for Environmental Protection Rural Sociology 47 (1) : 114 28.
18. Press, Daniel. 2003 Who Votes for Natural Resources in California? Society and Natural Resources 16 (9) : 835 46.
19. Romero, Francine Sanders Adrian Liserio. 2002 Saving Open Space: Determinants of 1998 and 1999 'Antisprawl' Voting Measures Social Science Quarterly 83 (1) : 341 52.
20. Salka, William. 2001 Urban-Rural Conflict Over Environmental Policy in the Western United States American Review of Public Administration 31 (1) : 33 48.
21. Sayers, Lois W. 1989. Pooled Times Series Analysis. Newberry Park, CA : Sage Publications.
22. Tremblay, Kenneth Riley Dunlap. 1978 Rural Residence and Concern with Environmental Quality: A Replication and Extension Rural Sociology 43 (3) : 474 91.
23. U.S. Census Bureau. 2006. Summary Files 1, 2 and 3. Generated by Mirya Holman. Washington, DC : U.S. Census Bureau.
24. Uyeki, Eugene Lani Holland. 2000 Diffusion of Pro-Environment Attitudes? American Behavioral Scientist 43 (4) : 646 62.
25. Van Liere, Kent Riley Dunlap. 1980 The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations, and Empirical Evidence Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (2) : 181 97.