Points of view

Argumentation

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 387-405

  Houtlosser, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Argumentation theory; Attitude; Belief; Claim; Conclusion; Opinion; Point of view; Proposition; Standpoint; Thesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 54749103916     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007770813424     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Anscombre, J.-C. and O, Ducrot: 1989, 'Argumentativity and Informativity', in M. Meyer (ed.), From Metaphysics to Rhetoric, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 71-87.
2. Aristotle (1928). Prior Analytics, W. D. Ross (ed.), Clarendon, Oxford.
3. Atelsek, J.: 1981, 'An Anatomy of Opinions', Language in Society 10(2), 217-225.
4. Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue. A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
5. Cohen, L. J.: 1989, 'Belief and Acceptance', Mind 48(391), 367-389.
6. Crawshay-Williams, R.: 1957, Methods and Criteria of Reasoning. An Inquiry into the Structure of Controversy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
7. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris, PDA 1, Dordrecht/Cinnaminson.
8. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1991, 'The Study of Argumentation from a Speech Act Perspective', in J. Verschueren (ed.), Pragmatics at Issue. Selected Papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, August 17-22, 1987. Vol. I, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 151-170.
9. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, The University of Alabama Press, London/Tuscaloosa.
11. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, A. F. Snoeck Henkemans, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, E. C. W. Krabbe, Chr. Plantin, D. N. Walton, C. A. Willard, J. Woods and D. Zarefsky: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
12. Fisher, A.: 1988, The Logic of Real Arguments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Freeley, A. J.: 1993, Argumentation and Debate. Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 8th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
14. Govier, T.: 1992, A Practical Study of Argument. 3rd revised edition, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
15. Grice, H. P.: 1975, 'Logic and Conversation', in P. Cole and J .L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, London, pp. 41-58.
16. Harman, G.: 1973, Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
17. Harman, G.: 1986, Change in View, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
18. Houtlosser, P.: 1995, Standpunten in een kritische discusie. Een pragma-dialectisch perspectief op de identificatie en reconstructie van standpunten [Standpoints in a Critical Discussion. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective on the Identification and Reconstruction of Standpoints], IFOTT, Amsterdam.
19. Johnson, R. H. and J. A. Blair: 1994, Logical Self-Defense. United States Edition, McGraw Hill Ryerson, Toronto.
20. Kopperschmidt, J.: 1987, 'The Function of Argumentation: A Pragmatic Approach', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation 1986, Foris Publications, 3A, Dordrecht/Providence, pp. 179-188.
21. Kopperschmidt, J.: 1989, Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.
22. Krech, D. and R. S. Crutchfield: 1969, Elements of Psychology, Knopf, New York.
23. Naess, A.: 1966, Communication and Argument. Elements of Applied Semantics [Translation of En del elementaere logiske emner. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1947], Allen and Unwin, London.
24. O'Keefe, D.: 1990, Persuasion. Theory and Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
25. Perelman, Ch. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation (Vert. van La nouvelle rhétorique. Traité de l' argumentation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame/Londen.
26. Schellens, P. J.: 1985, Redelijke argumenten. Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers [Reasonable Arguments. An Examination of the Norms of Critical Reading]. Foris, Dordrecht.
27. Schiffer, S.: 1987, Remnants of Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
28. Schiffrin, D.: 1985, 'Everyday Argument: The Organization of Diversity in Talk', in T. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis 3, Academic Press, London, pp. 35-46.
29. Schiffrin, D.: 1987, Discourse Markers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Schiffrin, D.: 1990, 'The Management of a Co-operative Self During Argument: The Role of Opinions and Stories', in A. D. Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict Talk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, pp. 241-259.
31. Thomas, S. N.: 1986, Practical Reasoning in Natural Language, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
32. Toulmin, S. E.: 1958/1988, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Toulmin, S. E., R. Rieke and A. Janik: 1979, An Introduction to Reasoning, Macmillan, New York.
34. Weddle, P.: 1988, 'Distinguishing Fact from Opinion', in T. Govier (ed.), Selected Issues in Logic and Communication, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp. 55-64.