The re-integration process from the perspective of prisoners: Opinions, perceived value and participation

European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 211-234

  Nelissen, Peter P H ^a  

^a NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Correctional programmes; Motivation; Penal policies; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 54749099115     PISSN: 09281371     EISSN: 15729869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008684525371     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Andrews, D.A., J. Bonta and R.D. Hoge, Classification for effective rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), pp. 19-52, 1990.
2. Antonowicz, D.H. and R. Ross, Essential components of successful rehabilitation programs for offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38(2), pp. 97-105, 1994.
3. Blokland, L.J., Werken achter trailes (Doctoral Dissertation, G.U. Amsterdam). Amsterdam, 1974.
4. Boin, A., Het gevangeniswezen: naar een nieuwe balans tussen centrale controle en autonomie van inrichtingen. Sancties, (3), pp. 147-162, 1995.
5. Bonta, J. and P. Gendreau, Re-examining the cruel and unusual punishment of prison life. Law and Human Behavior, 14(4), pp. 347-372, 1990.
6. Boshier, R., Education Inside: Motives for Participation in Prison Education Programmes. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia University, 1983.
7. Brouwers, M. and M. Sampiemon, Vrouwen in detentie [Women in detention]. The Hague: Ministry of Justice/ WODC, 1988.
8. Conrad, J.P., A lost ideal, a new hope: the way toward effective correctional treatment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72(4), pp. 1699-1735, 1981.
9. Clemmer, D.,The Prison Community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1958.
10. Cloward, R.A. et al., Social control in the prison. In: Theoretical Studies in Social Organization of the Prison. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1960.
11. Cullen FT. and K.E. Gilbert, Reaffirming Rehabilitation. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing, 1982.
12. Denkers, F.A.C.M., Criminologie en Beleid. Nijmegen: Dekker & van de Vegt, 1976.
13. Dilulio, J.J., Jr., No Escape: The Future of American Corrections. New York: Basic Books, 1991.
14. Garabedian, P.C., Social roles and processes of socialization in the prison community. Social Problems, 11, pp. 139-152, 1963.
15. Gendreau, P. and R.R. Ross, Effective correctional treatment: bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime and Delinquency, 25, pp. 463-489, 1979.
16. Goffman, E., Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NJ: Anchor, 1961.
17. Grapendaal, M., B. van der Linden and A. Rook, Regiem in ontwikfeling. The Hague, Ministry of Justice/WODC, 1985.
18. Halleck, S.L. and A.D. Witte, Is rehabilitation dead? Crime and Delinquency, 23(4), pp. 372-382, 1977.
19. Hamm, M.S. and J.L. Schrink, The conditions of effective implementation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 16(2), pp. 166-182, 1989.
20. Heyder, A., Resocialisatie, een ideaal in de gevangenis. Deventer: Kluwer, 1966.
21. 't Hart, A.C., Totale instituties en het totalitaire. Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 1993.
22. Herbschleb, M.D. and F. Zorge, Hoe zit het met de kwaliteit van de detentie in de Geerhorst? The Hague: Ministry of Justice, D. en J., Beleidsinformatie, 1992.
23. Irwin, J., The Felon. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1970.
24. Kelk, C., Recht voor gedetineerden. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson, 1978.
25. Kelk, C., Het grote belang van een goed gestructureerde en rijke detentiefasering. Sancties, (2), pp. 69-82, 1993.
26. Kolstad, A., Imprisonment as Rehabilitation: Offenders' assessment of why it does not work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(4), pp. 323-335, 1996.
27. Krisberg, B., Utility of process evaluation: crime and delinquency programs. In: M.W. Klein and K.S. Teilmann (Eds), Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation, pp. 217-236. London: Sage, 1980.
28. Kuhn, A., Incarceration rates: Europe versus USA. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4(3), pp. 46-74, 1996.
29. Logan, C.H. and G.G. Gaes, Justice Quarterly, 10(2), pp. 245-264, 1993.
30. Lösel, F., Changing patterns in the use of prisons: an evidence-based perspective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4(3), pp. 108-128, 1996.
31. Martinson, R., What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform Public Interest, Spring, pp. 22-54, 1974.
32. Melk, G.D., Resocialisatie in de gevangenis. Delikt en Delinkwent, 15(8), pp. 749-766, 1985.
33. Melk, G.D., Is resocialisatie in de gevangenis mogelijk? Delikt en Delinkwent, 23(8), pp. 780-792, 1993.
34. Moerings, L.M., Recente ontwikkelingen in gevangeniswezen. Delikt en Delinkwent, 14(3), pp. 220-236, 1984.
35. Morris, T and P. Morris, Pentonville: A Sociological Study of an English Prison. London: Routledge, 1963.
36. Palmer, T., Programmatic and non-programmatic aspects of successful intervention: new directions for research. Crime and Delinquency, 41(1), pp. 100-131, 1995.
37. Palmer, T., Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, pp. 133-152, 1975.
38. Palmer, T., The effectiveness of intervention: recent trends and current issues. Crime and Delinquency, 37(3), pp. 330-346, 1991.
39. Parsons, M. and M. Langenbach, The reasons inmates indicate they participate in prison education programs: another look at Boshier's PEPS. Journal of Correctional Education, 44(1), pp. 38-41, 1993.
40. Patterson, W., Changing philosophies and prison management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 21, pp. 214-227, 1988.
41. Quay, H.C., The three faces of evaluation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4(4), pp. 341-355, 1977.
42. Ross, R.R., E.A. Fabiano and C.D. Ewles, Reasoning and rehabilitation. International Journal on Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, pp. 29-36, 1990.
43. Ryan, T.A., Literacy training and reintegration of offenders. Forum on Corrections, 3(1), pp. 17-23, 1991.
44. Sechrest, L., S.O. White and E.D. Brown, The Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders Problems and Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1979.
45. Street, D., R. Vinter and Ch. Perrow, Organization for Treatment. New York: Free Press, 1966.
46. Sykes, G.M. and S.L. Messinger, The inmate social system. In: R. Cloward et al. (Eds), Theoretical Studies in Social Organization of the Prison. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1960.
47. Toch, H., Living in Prison: The Ecology of Survival. New York: Macmillan, 1977.
48. Tootoonchi, A., College education in prison: the inmates' perspectives. Federal Probation, 57(4), pp. 34-40, 1993.
49. van der Linden, B., Middellanggestraften; een vergelijking van twee gevangenisregiems. The Hague: Ministry of Justice/WODC, 1981.
50. Veringa, G.H., Tien jaar Beginselenwet; vrijheidsstraf, grenzen en mogelijkheden. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Criminologie. 5, pp. 131-148, 1963.
51. Warren, M.Q., Correctional treatment and coercion: The differential effectiveness perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, pp. 335-376, 1977.
52. Whittington, J., Lifers, long-term prisoners and education. Prison Service Journal, (96), pp. 49-51, 1994.
53. Winters, CA., Inmate opinions toward education and participation in prison education programmes. Police Journal, 68(1), pp. 39-50, 1995.
54. Wright, K.N., A study of individual, environmental, and interactive effects in explaining adjustment to prison. Justice Quarterly, 8(2), pp. 217-243, 1991.
55. Zamble, E. and F.J. Porporino, Coping, Behavior and Adaptation in Prison Inmates. New York: Springer, 1988.
56. Zamble, E. and F.J. Porporino, Coping, imprisonment and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), pp. 53-70, 1990.
57. Zwezerijnen, J.J.A., Dwang en Vertrouwen. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson, 1972.