Achieving optimal accuracy in frameless functional neurosurgical procedures

Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 332-333

  Henderson, Jaimie M ^a   Holloway, Kathryn L ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; LETTER; NEURONAVIGATION; NEUROSURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUALITY CONTROL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; HUMANS; NEURONAVIGATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 54749083535     PISSN: 10116125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000160157     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Bjartmarz H, Rehncrona S: Comparison of accuracy and precision between frame-based and frameless stereotactic navigation for deep brain stimulation electrode implantation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2007;85:235-242.
2. Henderson JM, Holloway KL, Gaede SE, Rosenow JM: The application accuracy of a skull mounted trajectory guide for image-guided functional neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 2004;9:155-160.
3. Maciunas RJ, Fitzpatrick JM, Galloway RL, Allen GS: Beyond stereotaxy: extreme levels of application accuracy are provided by implantable fiducial markers for interactive image guided neurosurgery; in Maciunas RJ (ed): Interactive Image Guided Neurosurgery. Park Ridge, AANS Publications, 1993, pp 259-270.
4. Holloway KL, Gaede SE, Starr PA, Rosenow JM, Ramakrishnan V, Henderson JM: Frameless stereotaxy using bone fiducials for deep brain stimulation. J Neurosurg 2005;103:404-413.