International comparisons of biotechnology policies

Journal of Consumer Policy

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 527-550

  Chen, Zhiqi ^a   McDermott, Alison ^b,c  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b INDUSTRY CANADA   (Canada)

^c Station M   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649085166     PISSN: 01687034     EISSN: 15730700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006960807550     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Althaus, S. (1996). Survey - Biotechnology: Public opposition now on the wane. Financial Times, November 26, p. 2.
2. Ardley, J., & Hoptroff, C. G. M. (1996). Protecting plant "invention": The role of plant-variety rights and patents. Trends in Biotechnology, 14, 67-69.
3. Borrus, M. (1983). The politics of competitive erosion in the U.S. steel industry. In: J. Zysman & L. Tyson (Eds.), American industry in international competition, pp. 60-105. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4. Brock, M.V. (1989). Biotechnology in Japan. London: Routledge.
5. BWI (1996a). Bio-World International, August 14, p. 4.
6. BWI (1996b). Bio-World International, November 20, p. 2.
7. BWI (1996c). Bio-World International, December 18, p. 1.
8. Chen, Z. (forthcoming). Adoption of new technology by a lagging country: Leapfrogging or no leapfrogging? Pacific Economic Review.
9. Coombs, J., & P. N. Campbell, P. N. (1991). Biotechnology worldwide. Newbury: CPL Press.
10. Crespi, R. S. (1997). Biotechnology patents and morality. Trends in Biotechnology, 15, 123-129.
11. EC food regulations published (1997). Nature Biotechnology, 15, 300.
12. The Economist (1995). November 18, p. 91.
13. Fox, J. (1997). Biotech food labelling: Polite hedging or loggerheads? Nature Biotechnology, 15, 308.
14. Hodgson, J. (1997). UK's Ciba maize decision political? Nature Biotechnology, 15, 308-310.
15. Industry Canada (1996). Sector competitiveness frameworks - Bio-industries. Ottawa: Industry Canada.
16. Johnson, E. (1997). European politics pass food regulations lacking meat. Nature Biotechnology, 15, 210.
17. KPMG (1995). Improving Canadian biotechnology regulation - A study of the U.S. experience. Toronto: KMPG.
18. MacKenzie, D. (1990a). Germany bows to pressure over gene research. New Scientist, 125 (March 10), p. 28.
19. MacKenzie, D. (1990b). West Germany's gene law weakens role of public opinion. New Scientist, 126 (April 14), p. 17.
20. Miller, H. I. (1996). Biotechnology and the UN: New challenges, new failures. Nature Biotechnology, 14, 831-834.
21. Miller, H. I. (1997). The end of big government? Nature Biotechnology, 15, 111.
22. Nature (1992). 359 (October 15), p. 577.
23. Nature (1995). 378 (November 23), p. 326.
24. Nature (1997). 387 (May 22), p. 326.
25. OECD (1996). Science, technology and industry outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
26. Olson, S. (1986) Biotechnology: An industry comes of age. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. OTA (1989). New developments in biotechnology: Patenting life. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States.
28. OTA (1991). Biotechnology in a global economy. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States.
29. Saxonhouse, G.R. (1986). Industrial policy and factor markets: Biotechnology in Japan and the United States. In: H. Patrick (Ed.), Japan's high technology industries: Lessons and limitations of industrial policy, pp. 97-135. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
30. Scheidegger, A. (1988). Biotechnology in Japan: A lesson in logistics? Trends in Biotechnology, 6, 7-15, 47-53.
31. Sorell, L.S., & Seide, R. K. (1996). Patenting biotechnology process inventions. Biotechnology, 14, 158-159.
32. Sorj, B., Cantley, M., & Simpson, K. (Eds.) (1989). Biotechnology in Europe and Latin America. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. Yuan, R.T. (1987). Biotechnology in Western Europe. Washington, D.C.: U.S. International Trade Administration.