Evaluations of rebuttal analogy users: Ethical and competence considerations

Argumentation

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 351-365

  Whaley, Bryan B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

Argument; Competence; Ethics; Rebuttal analogy; Social attack

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649084589     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007783009424     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Aristotle: 1987, Poetics (Richard Janko, Trans.), Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.
2. Aristotle: 1932, The Rhetoric of Aristotle (Lane Cooper, Trans.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Baaske, K.: 1991, 'Analogic Argument in Public Discourse: A Reconsideration of the Nature and Function of Analogy', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendurst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argument, Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp. 411-415.
4. Bennett, W. L.: 1977, 'The Ritualistic and Pragmatic Bases of Political Campaign Discourse', Quarterly Journal of Speech 63, 219-238.
5. Benoit, W. and J. France: 1980, 'Analogical Reasoning in Legal Argumentation', in J. Rhodes and S. Newell (eds.), Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Annandale, VA, pp. 49-61.
6. Blair, J. A.: 1990, 'Fallacies in Everyday Argument', in R. Trapp and J. Schuetz (eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockrieds, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL, pp. 121-133.
7. Bowers, J. W. and M. M. Osborn: 1966, 'Attitudinal Effects of Selected Types of Concluding Metaphors in Persuasive Speeches', Speech Monographs 33, 147-155.
8. Bradac, J. J.: 1983, 'On Generalizing Cabbages, Messages, Kings, and Several Other Things: The Virtues of Multiplicity', Human Communication Research 9, 181-187.
9. Carpenter, B. and K. F. Schmidt: July 1992, Whales. US News & World Report 113, 59.
10. Chaiken, S. and A. H. Eagly: 1983, 'Communication Modality as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Role of Communicator Salience', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 241-256.
11. Clark, H. H.: 1973, 'The Language-as-Fixed-Effect Fallacy: A Critique of Language Statistics in Psycholinguistics', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, 335-359.
12. Corbett, E. P. J.: 1971, Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Cronen, V.: 1976, 'The Interaction of Refutation Type, Involvement, and Authoritativeness', in J. Blankenship and H. Stelzner (eds.), Rhetoric and Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, pp. 155-170.
14. Downs, V. C., L. L. Kaid and S. Ragan: 1990, 'The Impact of Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggression on Communicator Image: The Exchange between George Bush and Dan Rather', Western Journal of Speech Communication 54, 99-112.
15. Fraser, B. and W. Nolan: 1981, 'The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form', International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27, 93-109.
16. Freeley, A. J.: 1986, Argumentation & Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making (6th edition), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
17. Friedman, P.: 1992, Inadmissible Evidence, D. I. Fine, New York.
18. Gentner, D.: 1982, 'Are Scientific Analogies Metaphors?', in D. S. Miall (ed.), Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, pp. 106-132.
19. Gentner, D.: 1983, 'Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy', Cognitive Science 7, 155-170.
20. Goodall, H. L.: 1985, 'The Nature of Analogic Discourse', Quarterly Journal of Speech 71, 171-179.
21. Graham, G. M.: 1928, 'Analogy - A Study in Proof and Persuasion Values', Quarterly Journal of Speech 14, 534-542.
22. Gross, A.: 1983, 'Analogy and Intersubjectivity: Political Oratory, Scholarly Argument and Scientific Reports', Quarterly Journal of Speech 69, 37-46.
23. Hecht, B.: July 1991, 'Out of Joint', The New Republic, pp. 7-10.
24. Hockenberry, J.: November 22, 1993, 'By Reason of Insanity', DAY ONE. Transcript #138, p. 4.
25. Hollihan, T. and K. Baaske: 1994, Arguments and Arguing: The Products of Process and Human Decision Making, St. Martin's, New York.
26. Hunter, J. E., M. Hamilton and M. Allen: 1989, 'The Design and Analysis of Language Experiments in Communication', Communication Monographs 56, 341-363.
27. Infante, D. A.: 1988, Arguing Constructively, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL.
28. Jackson, S.: 1992, Message Effects Research: Principles of Design and Analysis, The Guilford Press, New York.
29. Jackson, S. and D. Brashers: 1994a, 'M > 1: Analysis of Treatment by Replication Designs', Human Communication Research 20, 356-389.
30. Jackson, S. and D. Brashers: 1994b, Random Factors in Anova, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
31. Jenson, J. V.: 1981, Argumentation: Reasoning in Communication, D. Van Nostrand, New York.
32. Johnson, J. T. and S. E. Taylor: 1981, 'The Effect of Metaphor on Political Attitudes', Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2, 305-316.
33. Kahane, H.: 1984, Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life (4th ed.), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
34. McCroskey, J. C. and W. H. Combs: 1969, 'The Effects of the Use of Analogy on Attitude Change and Source Credibility', Journal of Communication 19, 333-339.
35. Perelman, C: 1979, The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications, Reidel Publishing Company, Boston, MA.
36. Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver Trans.), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
37. Read, S., I. Cesa, D. Jones and N. Collins: 1990, 'When is the Federal Budget Like a Baby? Metaphor in Political Rhetoric', Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 5, 125-149.
38. Reinsch, N. L.: 1971, 'An Investigation of the Effects of the Metaphor and Simile in Persuasive Discourse', Speech Monographs 38, 142-145.
39. Reinsch, N. L.: 1974, 'Figurative Language and Source Credibility: A Preliminary Investigation and Reconceptualization', Human Communication Research 1, 75-80.
40. Rieke, R. D. and M. O. Sillars: 1993, Argumentation: Critical Decision Making (3rd ed.), Harper Collins, New York.
41. Roberts, P.: November 1992, 'Zero Cut', Seattle Weekly, pp. 19-20.
42. Sanders, J. A., R. L. Wiseman and R. H. Gass: 1994, 'Does Teaching Argumentation Facilitate Critical Thinking?', Communication Reports 7, 27-35.
43. Schreier, M., N. Groeben and G. Blickle: 1995, 'The Effects of (Un-)fairness and (Im-)politeness on the Evaluations of Argumentative Communication', Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14, 260-288.
44. Siltanen, S. A.: 1981, 'The Persuasiveness of Metaphor: A Replication and Extension', Southern Speech Communication Journal 47, 67-83.
45. Sternberg, R. J.: 1977, 'Component Processes in Analogical Reasoning', Psychological Review 84, 353-378.
46. Sternberg, R. J. and G. Nigro: 1983, 'Interaction and Analogy in the Comprehension and Appreciation of Metaphors', Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35, 17-38.
47. Sullivan, B.: January 1991, The NorthCoast Journal 11, 17.
48. Thagard, P.: 1992, 'Analogy, Explanation, and Education', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 537-544.
49. Trapp, R. and J. Schuetz (eds.): 1990, Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL.
50. Whaley, B. B.: in press, 'Perceptions of Rebuttal Analogy: Politeness and Implications for Persuasion', Argumentation and Advocacy.
51. Whaley, B. B.: 1991, Toward a Comprehensive Model of Analogy in Persuasion: A Test of the Persuasive Roles of Analogy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
52. Whaley, B. B. and A. S. Babrow: 1993, 'Analogy in Persuasion: Translator's Dictionary or Art?', Communication Studies 44, 239-253.
53. Whaley, B. B. and R. L. Holloway: in press, 'Rebuttal Analogy as Political Argument: Affiliation and Attack in Sound Bite', Political Communication.
54. Whaley, B. B. and R. L. Holloway: 1996, 'Rebuttal Analogy: A Theoretical Note', Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 11, 161-167.
55. Whaley, B. B. and D. L. Weber: May 1996, Persuasion and Likeability: Rebuttal Analogy as Heuristic Cue. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
56. Wilcox, J. R. and H. L. Ewbank: 1979, 'Analogy for Rhetors', Philosophy and Rhetoric 12, 1-19.
57. Zashin, E. and P. C. Chapman: 1974, 'The Uses of Metaphor and Analogy: Toward a Renewal of Political Language', Journal of Politics 36, 290-326.