Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States: Findings related to research and evaluation

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 115-126

  Shaw, David E ^a,b   Becker, Henry J ^c   Bransford, John D ^d   Davidson, Jan ^e   Hawkins, Jan ^f   Malcom, Shirley ^g   Molina, Mario ^h   Ride, Sally K ^h   Sharp, Phillip ⁱ   Tinker, Robert F ^h   Vest, Charles ^j   Young, John ^h  

^a Panel on Educational Technology   (United States)

^b D E SHAW RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Davidson Group   (United States)

^f Educational Development Center   (United States)

^g AAAS   (United States)

^h MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j Concord Consortium ^*  (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Constructivism; Evaluation; K 12 education; Research; Technology; Technology and education

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649084378     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022539822660     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American Psychological Association (1982). Ethical Principles in the Conduct of Research with Human Participants, Washington, D.C.
2. Atkinson, Richard C, and Jackson, Gregg B. (Eds.), (1992). Research and Educational Reform: Roles for the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1992). The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool, School Science and Mathematics, pp. 69-93.
4. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University, (1992). The Jasper Series as an Example of Anchored Instruction: Theory, Program Description and Assessment Data. Educational Psychologist 27: 291-315.
5. Dede, C. (1995). Written statement submitted to the PCAST Panel on Educational Technology, p. 2.
6. Gardner, C. M., Sirnmons, P. E., and Simpson, R. D. (1992). The Effects of CAI and Hands-On Activities on Elementary Students' Attitude and Weather Knowledge, School Science and Mathematics, 92: 334-336.
7. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., and Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-Anafysis in Social Research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.
8. Hawkins, Jan, (1996). Dilemmas, in Education and Technology: Reflections on Computing in Classrooms, C. Fisher, D. C. Dwyer, and K. Yokom (Eds.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
9. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-Analytic Studies of Findings on Computer-Based Instruction, in Technology Assessment in Education and Training. E. L. Baker and H. F. O'Neil (Eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
10. Means, B., and Olsen, K. (1995). Technology's Role in Educational Reform, in U.S. Department of Education Report, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, D.C.
11. National Academy of Education (1991). National Academy of Education, Research and the Renewal of Education. Author, Stanford, California.
12. Reil, M. (1990). Cooperative Learning Across Classrooms In Electronic Learning Circles, Instructional Sciences 19: 445-466.
13. Slavin, R. E. (1988). Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews, in Evaluation Studies Review Yearbook, Vol. 12. W. R. Shadish and C. S. Reichart (Eds.), Sage Publications, London.
14. U.S. General Accounting Office (1987). Education Information: Changes in Funds and Priorities Have Affected Production and Quality, Washington, D.C. as reported in National Academy of Education, Research and the Renewal of Education, National Academy of Education, Stanford, California.