Can consequentialism be reconciled with our common-sense moral intuitions?

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-19

  Portmore, Douglas W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649083867     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004231810511     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Broome, J. (1991): Weighing Goods, New York: Blackwell.
2. Dreier, J. (1993): 'Structures of Normative Theories', The Monist 76, 22-40.
3. Kagan, S. (1989): The Limits of Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Kamm, F. (1989): 'Harming Some to Save Others', Philosophical Studies 57, 227-260.
5. Kamm, F. (1992): 'Non-consequentialism, the Person as an End-in-itself, and the Significance of Status', Philosophy and Public Affairs 21, 354-389.
6. Kamm, F. ( 1996): Morality, Morality, Vol. 2, New York: Oxford University Press.
7. McNaughton, D. and Rawling, P. (1991): 'Agent-Relativity and the Doing-happening Distinction', Philosophical Studies 63, 167-185.
8. McNaughton, D. and Rawling, P. (1993): 'Deontology and Agency', The Monist 76, 81-100.
9. Parfit, D. (1976): 'On Doing the Best for Our Children', in M. Bayles (ed.), Ethics and Population, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
10. Scheffler, S. (1982): The Rejection of Consequentialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Sen, A. (1982): 'Rights and Agency', Philosophy and Public Affairs 11, 3-39.
12. Sen, A. (1983): 'Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation', Philosophy and Public Affairs 12, 113-132.