An approach to consider the semiotic messages of school science learning culture

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 221-240

  Shapiro, Bonnie ^a   Kirby, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649083529     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009402023896     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aikenhead, G. (1996). Cultural assimilation in science classrooms: Border crossings and other solutions. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
2. Ball, S. J. (Ed.). (1990). Foucauh and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
3. Berbekar,R. (1989). Signs and symbols: Semiotics in education. ATA Magazine, 70(1), 31-33.
4. Bernstein, B. (1972). A critique of contemporary education. In C. Cazden, V. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Bowers, C. A. (1990). Implications of Gregory Bateson's ideas for a semiotic of art education. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 31(2), 69-77.
6. Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is "another world:" Relationships between the worlds of family friends, school and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313-333.
7. Crenshaw, S. R. (1991, April). A semiotic look at kindergarten writing. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
8. Cunningham, D. J. (1984). What every teacher should know about semiotics. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication, National INstitutc of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 250 282)
9. Cunningham, D. J. (1987). Ou tline of an education semiotic. Ameri can Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 195-201.
10. Danesi, M. (1994). Messages and meanings: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars Press.
11. Deely, J. (Ed.). (1986). Frontiers in semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12. Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13. Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14. Eco, U. (1985). How culture conditions the colors we see. In M. Blonsky (Ed.), On signs (pp. 157-175). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. New York: Schoken.
16. Firth, R. (1972), Verbal and bodily rituals in greeting and parting. In J. LaFontaine (Ed.), The interpretation of ritual (pp. 1-38). New York: Academic Press.
17. Golder, J., & Gerber, A. (1990). A semiotic perspective of text: The picture story event. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(3), 203-219.
18. Groisman, A., Shapiro, B., & Willinsky, J. (1991). The potential of semiotics to inform the understanding of events in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 217-226.
19. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive powers. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
20. Harland, R. (1987). Superstructuralism: The philosophy of structuralism and post-structuralism. London, UK: Methuen.
21. Hawkins, J., & Pea, R. D. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal of Research, in Science Teaching, 24(4), 291-307.
22. Krugly-Smolska, E. (1995). Cultural influences in science education. Internationaljournal of Science Education, 77(1), 45-58.
23. Lafcrrier, D. (1979). Making room for semiotics. Academe, 65(7), 434-440.
24. Lemke, J. L. (1984). Semiotics and education. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Victoria University.
25. Lemke, J.L. (1987a). Talking science: Content,conflict andsemantics. Urbana.IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication, National Institute of Educaiton. (ERIC Document Reproduction Servi ce No. ED 282 402)
26. Lemke, J. L. (1987b). Social semiotics and science education. The American Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 217-232.
27. Lemke, J. L. (1988). Genres, semantics, and classroom education. Linguists and Education, 7, 81-99.
28. Lemke, J. L. (1989). Social semiotics: A new model for literacy education. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp. 289-309). Norwood, NJ: Ablcx Publishing.
29. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
30. Maddock, M. N. (1981). Science education: An anthropological viewpoint. Studies in Science Education, 8, 1-26.
31. McLaren, P. (1986). Schooling as a ritual performance. London, UK: Routledge & Kcgan Paul.
32. Percy, W. (1982). The message in the bottle. New York: Farrar, Straus and Girous.
33. Pcirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. 1-6. C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Peirce, C. S. (1985). Logic as semiotics: The theory uf signs. In R. E. Innis (Ed.), Semiotics: An introductory anthology (pp. 4-27). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35. Phenix, P. H. (1964). The architectonics of knowledge. In S. Elam (Ed.), Education and the structure of knowledge. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
36. Pomeroy, D. (1994). Science education and cultural diversity: Mapping the field. Studies in Science Education, 24, 49-73.
37. Russell, T., & Schoenberger, M. (1986). Elementary science as a little added frill. Science Education, 70, 419-438.
38. Science Council of Canada and the Canadian Advanced Technology Association. (1990), Firing up the technology engine. Ottawa, Ontario: Ministry of Supply and Services.
39. Shapiro, B. (1992). A life of science learning: An approach to the stud γ of personal, social and cultural features in the initiation to school science. In G. L. C. Hills (Ed.), History andphilosophy of science in science education. Vol II (pp. 429-447). Tallahassee: University of Florida.
40. Shapiro, B. (in press). Reading the furniture: Broadening the notion of text in semiotic analysis. In K. Tobin & B. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 609-621). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
41. Siegel, M. (1989). Critical Thinking: A semiotic perspective. Monographs on teaching critical thinking, No. 1. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
42. Smith, D. (1989). Modernism, post-modernism and the future of pedagogy. Paper prepared for the Canadian Studies Program, Institute of East and West Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
43. Socbel, D. (1993). Children's special places: Rxplnring the role of forts, dens, and bush houses in middle childhood. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.
44. Swift, D. (1992). Indigenous knowledge in the service of science and technology in developing countries. Studies in Science Education, 20, 1-27.
45. Toulmin, S. E. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton, STATE: Princeton University Press.
46. Wilson, B. (1981), The cultural contexts of science and mathematics education: Preparation of a bibliographic guide. Studies in Science Education, 8, 27-44.
47. Worth, S. (1981). Visual communication. In L. Gross (Ed.), Studying visual communication (pp. 231 386). Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.