Workplace substance testing - An exploratory study

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 41-55

  Jain, Harish C ^a,b   Piczak, Michael ^a   Zeytinoglu, Isik Urla ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Empirical study; Policy implications; Workplace substance testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649083520     PISSN: 08927545     EISSN: 15733378     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1027324116634     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams, R. (1995). Industrial Relations Under Liberal Democracy. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
2. Alvi, S. (1992a). Corporate Responses to Substance Abuse in the Workplace. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada.
3. Alvi, S. (1992b). A survey of corporate responses. Canadian Business Review, Summer, 14-16.
4. Baker, A. (1989). Preventing Drug Abuse at Work. Personnel Administrator, July, 56-59.
5. Carrell, M., & Heavrin, C. (1990). Before you drug test . . . . HR Magazine, June, 64-68.
6. Chaison, G., & Rose, J., (1991). Continental divide: The direction and fate of North American unions. In Sockell, D., Lewin, D., & Lipsky, D. (Eds), Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 5, 169-206. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
8. Chaykowski, R., & Verma, A. (1992). Canadian Industrial Relations in Transition. In Chaykowski, R., & Verma, A. (Eds.), Industrial Relations in Canadian Industry, 1-38. Toronto: Dryden Press.
9. Christopher, T. (1991). Employee Drug Testing: A Constitutional Perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 311-328.
10. Decresce, R., Lifshitz, M., Ambre, J., Mazura, A., Tilson, J., & Cochran, K. (1989). Drug Testing in the Workplace. Chicago, Illinois: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.
11. Dwyer, D. (1989). Don't 'just say no' to drug testing in the workplace: Some recommendations for developing and implementing policy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 275-287.
12. Fine, S. (1995). Imperial oil alcoholism rule struck down: Policy requiring disclosure called illegal. Globe and Mail, June 27, B-1 and B-12.
13. Finney, M. (1988). The right to be tested. Personnel Administrator, March, 74-75.
14. Gibb-Clark, M. (1994). Tribunal allows TD drug testing: Bank's policy called intrusive. Globe and Mail, August 17, A1-2.
15. Gilson, C., & Wagar, T. (1995). The U.S./Canada Convergence Thesis, Contrary Evidence from Nova Scotia. Relations Industrielles, 50, 67-84.
16. Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. (1987). Dimensions and characteristics of personnel manager perceptions of effective drug testing programs. Personnel Psychology, 40, 745-763.
17. Gramm, C., & Greenfield, P. (1990). Arbitral Standards in Medical Screening Grievances. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3, 169-184.
18. Greenberg, R. (1988). Workplace Testing: Results of a New AMA Survey. Personnel, April, 36-44.
19. Greenfield, P. (1989). Drug Testing and the Law. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 11-26.
20. Guest, D. (1987). Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 503-521.
21. Guthrie, J., & Olian, J. (1991). Drug and alcohol testing programs: Do firms consider their operating environment?. HR Planning, 14, 252-266.
22. Jain H., & Muthudichambaram, S. (1991). Alcohol and Drugs in the Workplace: Issues and Policies with Special Reference to Arbitral Jurisprudence. Toronto: Ontario Law Reform Commission.
23. Karren, R. (1989). An Analysis of the Drug Testing Decision. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2, 27-37.
24. MacDonald, S., & Dooley, S. (1991). The Nature and Extent of EAPs and Drug Screening Programs in Canadian Transportation Companies. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 6, 23-40.
25. MacDonald, S. & Wells, S. (1994). The impact and effectiveness of drug testing programs in the workplace. In MacDonald, S., & Roman, P. (Eds.), Drug Testing in the Workplace, 121-142, New York: Plenum Press.
26. Martin, J., Blum, T., & Roman, P. (1992). Drinking to cope and self-medication: Characteristics of jobs in relation to workers' drinking behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 55-71.
27. Masi, D. (1987). Company responses to drug abuse from the AMA's survey. Personnel, March, 40-46.
28. Mensch, B., & Kandel, D. (1988). Do Job Conditions Influence the Use of Drugs? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 29, 169-184.
29. Miner, I., Nykodym, N., & Samerkyke-Traband, D. (1987). Put drug detection to the test. Personnel Journal, August, 91-97.
30. Mintzberg, H. (1978). The Structuring of Organizations, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
31. Newcomb, M. (1994). Predictors of drug use and implications for the workplace. In MacDonald, S., & Roman, P. (Eds.), Drug Testing in the Workplace, 33-56, New York: Plenum Press.
32. Newcomb, M., & Bentler, P. (1986). Cocaine use among adolescents: Longitudinal association with Social context, psychopathology, and use of other substances. Addictive Behaviors, 11, 262-273.
33. Pinsonneault, M. (1994). Some legal aspects of drug testing in the canadian workplace. In MacDonald, S., & Roman, P. (Eds.), Drug Testing in the Workplace, 121-142. New York: Plenum Press.
34. Strauss, G. (1995). Is the new deal system collapsing? With what might it be replaced?. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 34, 329-349.
35. Zigarelli, M. (1992). Random drug testing in the public sector: The legal parameters. Employee Relations Labor Journal, 17, 459-471.