Adult influence on the participation of peers without disabilities in peer support programs

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 397-413

  Shukla, Smita ^a   Kennedy, Craig H ^b,d   Cushing, Lisa Sharon ^c  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult influence; Peer support programs; Peers without disabilities; Social interaction; Students with severe disabilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649083195     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022801215119     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderegg, M. L., & Vergason, G. A. (1996). Preserving the least restrictive environment: Revisited. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 44-54). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
3. Breen, C. G. (1990). Setting up and managing peer support networks. In C. G. Breen, C. H. Kennedy, & T. G. Haring (Eds.), Methods for facilitating the inclusion of students with disabilities in integrated school and community contexts (pp. 54-105). Santa Barbara: Graduate School of Education, University of California.
4. Cushing, L. S., & Kennedy, C. H. (1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 139-152.
5. Dugan, E., Kamps, D., Leonard, B., Watkins, N., Rheinberger, A., & Stackhaus, J. (1995). Effects of cooperative learning groups during social studies for students with autism and fourth-grade peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 175-188.
6. Evans, I. M., Salisbury, C., Palombaro, M., & Goldberg, J. S. (1994). Children's perception of fairness in classroom and interpersonal situations involving peers with severe disabilities. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 326-332.
7. Fryxell, D., & Kennedy, C. H. (1995). Placement along the continuum of services and its impact on students' social relationships. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 259-269.
8. Gaylord-Ross, R., & Pitts-Conway, V. (1984). Social behavior development in integrated secondary autistic programs. In N. Certo, N. Haring, & R. York (Eds.), Public school integration of severely handicapped students: Rational issues and progressive alternatives (pp. 197-219). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9. Haring, T. G., & Breen, C. G. (1992). A peer-mediated social network intervention to enhance the social integration of persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 319-334.
10. Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (in press). Research on inclusive education: Programs, practices, and outcomes. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.
11. Hunt, P., Staub, D., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 290-301.
12. Idstein, P. (1993). Swimming against the mainstream. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 336-340.
13. Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (1995), The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
14. Kennedy, C. H., Cushing, L. S., & Itkonen, T. (1997). General education participation improves the social contacts and friendship networks of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 167-189.
15. Kennedy, C. H., Shukla, S., & Fryxell, D. (1997). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 31-47.
16. Kishi, G. S., & Meyer, L. H. (1994). What children report and remember: A six-year follow-up of the effects of social contact between peers with and without severe disabilities. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 277-289.
17. Leiberman, L. M. (1996). Preserving special education...for those who need it. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 16-28; 2nd ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
18. Leitenberg, H. (1973). The use of single-case methodology in psychotherapy research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 87-101.
19. Shukla, S., Kennedy, C. H., & Cushing, L. S. (in press). Supporting intermediate school students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms: A comparison of two approaches. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.
20. Stainback, S., Stainback, W., & Ayres, B. (1996). Schools as inclusive communities. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 31-43)(2nd ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Wacker, D. P., Steege, M. W., Northup, J., Sasso, G., Berg, W., Reimers, T., Cooper, L., Cigrand, K., & Donn, L. (1990). A component analysis of functional communication training across three topographies of severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 417-430.
22. Werts, M. G., Caldwell, N. K., & Wolery, M. (1996). The effects of fluent peer models on the observational learning of response chains by students with disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 53-66.