Effects of the chemomechanical stepping cycle on the traffic of molecular motors

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Klumpp, Stefan ^a   Chai, Yan ^b   Lipowsky, Reinhard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF COLLOIDS AND INTERFACES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINEAR MOTORS;

DETAILED KINETICS; EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATIONS; MOLECULAR MOTORS; MOTOR TRAFFICS; RUN LENGTHS; TRAFFIC BEHAVIORS; TRAFFIC DENSITIES;

MOTORS;

EID: 54549110285     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.041909     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. J. Howard, Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 2001).
2. S. Klumpp, M. J. I. Müller, and R. Lipowsky, in Traffic and Granular Flow '05, edited by, A. Schadschneider, T. Pöschel, R. Kühne, M. Schreckenberg and, D. E. Wolf, (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 251-261.
3. D. S. Goodsell, The Machinery of Life (Springer, New York, 1993).
4. O. Medalia, I. Weber, A. S. Frangakis, D. Nicastro, G. Gehrisch, and W. Baumeister, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1076184 298, 1209 (2002).
5. R. Lipowsky, S. Klumpp, and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.108101 87, 108101 (2001).
6. S. Klumpp and R. Lipowsky, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1023/A:1025778922620 113, 233 (2003).
7. K. Kruse and K. Sekimoto, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.031904 66, 031904 (2002).
8. A. Parmeggiani, T. Franosch, and E. Frey, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.086601 90, 086601 (2003).
9. M. R. Evans, R. Juhász, and L. Santen, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.026117 68, 026117 (2003).
10. S. Klumpp and R. Lipowsky, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2003-10155-6 66, 90 (2004).
11. S. Klumpp and R. Lipowsky, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066104 70, 066104 (2004).
12. G. A. Klein, K. Kruse, G. Cuniberti, and F. Jülicher, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.108102 94, 108102 (2005).
13. K. Nishinari, Y. Okada, A. Schadschneider, and D. Chowdhury, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.118101 95, 118101 (2005).
14. C. T. MacDonald, J. H. Gibbs, and A. C. Pipkin, Biopolymers BIPMAA 0006-3525 10.1002/bip.1968.360060102 6, 1 (1968).
15. J. Krug, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1882 67, 1882 (1991).
16. B. Derrida, M. R. Evans, V. Hakim, and V. Pasquier, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/26/7/011 26, 1493 (1993).
17. G. Schütz and E. Domany, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF01048050 72, 277 (1993).
18. S. Liepelt and R. Lipowsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.258102 98, 258102 (2007).
19. H. Wang, S.-X. Dou, and P.-Y. Wang, Chin. Phys. Lett. CPLEEU 0256-307X 10.1088/0256-307X/22/11/071 22, 2980 (2005).
20. P. Greulich, A. Garai, K. Nishinari, A. Schadschneider, and D. Chowdhury, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.041905 75, 041905 (2007).
21. C. Leduc, O. Campàs, K. B. Zeldovich, A. Roux, P. Jolimaitre, L. Bourel-Bonnet, B. Goud, J.-F. Joanny, P. Bassereau, and J. Prost, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0406598101 101, 17096 (2004).
22. S. Konzack, P. E. Rischitor, C. Enke, and R. Fischer, Mol. Biol. Cell MBCEEV 1059-1524 10.1091/mbc.E04-02-0083 16, 497 (2005).
23. S. Klumpp, T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, and R. Lipowsky, Biophys. J. BIOJAU 0006-3495 10.1529/biophysj.104.056127 88, 3118 (2005).
24. A. Seitz and T. Surrey, EMBO J. EMJODG 0261-4189 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600937 25, 267 (2006).
25. In general, if motors may unbind in a conformation different from the one they had immediately after binding, one step per run corresponds to an incomplete chemical cycle. This incomplete cycle leads to a correction of the probabilities Pi compared to the case where the chemical cycle is completed in each step. This correction is thus of order 1/(number of steps per run) and has a very small effect for processive motors.
26. The small nonzero value of 2 in has been introduced to avoid an artificial absorbing state, given by a filament fully occupied by motors in state 2, from which the system cannot escape within the simplest models if 2 =0. An alternative would be to introduce a reverse transition from state 2 to state 1 at the same position.
27. The peculiar shape of the curve reflects the change in the dominant unbinding pathway towards unbinding from state 2 at high unbound motor concentrations.
28. R. Lipowsky, Y. Chai, S. Klumpp, S. Liepelt, and M. J. I. Müller, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/j.physa.2006.05.019 372, 34 (2006).
29. I. M.-T. C. Crevel, M. Nyitrai, M. C. Alonso, S. Weiss, M. A. Geeves, and R. A. Cross, EMBO J. EMJODG 0261-4189 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600042 23, 23 (2004).
30. E. Frey and A. Vilfan, Chem. Phys. CMPHC2 0301-0104 10.1016/S0301- 0104(02)00553-0 284, 287 (2002).
31. N. J. Carter and R. A. Cross, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature03528 435, 308 (2005).
32. J. L. Ross, K. Wallace, H. Shuman, Y. E. Goldman, and E. L. Holzbaur, Nat. Cell Biol. NCBIFN 1465-7392 10.1038/ncb1421 8, 562 (2006).
33. A. Gennerich, A. P. Carter, S. L. Reck-Peterson, and R. D. Vale, Cell CELLB5 0092-8674 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.016 131, 952 (2007).