The links between MRS parameters and the hydrogeological parameters

Near Surface Geophysics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 259-265

  Lachassagne, Patrick ^a   Baltassat, Jean Michel ^a   Legchenko, Anatoly ^b   de Gramont, Hubert Machard ^a  

^a BRGM   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54549093320     PISSN: 15694445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2005021     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allen D., Andreani M., Badry R., Flaum C., Gossenberg P., Horkowitz J., Singer J. and White J. 1997. How to use borehole NMR. Schlumberger’s Oilfield Review, Summer, 34–57.
2. Beauce A., Bernard J., Legchenko A. and Valla P. 1996. A new geophysical technique for hydrogeological studies: the application of the nuclear magnetic resonance. Hydrogéologie 1996(1), 71–77.
3. Castany G. and Margat J. 1977. Dictionnaire Francais d’Hydrogéologie. BRGM, Orleans.
4. Dunn 2002. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - Petrophysical and Logging Applications. Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
5. Goldman M., Rabinovich B., Gilad D., Gev I. and Schirov M. 1994. Application of the integrated NMR-TDEM method in the groundwater exploration in Israel. Journal of Applied Geophysics 31, 27–52.
6. Kenyon W.E. 1997. Petrophysical principles of applications of NMR logging. The Log Analyst, March-April, 21—43.
7. rLachassagne P., Baltassat J.-M., Legchenko A. and Machard de Gramont H. 2003a. Links between MRS and the parameters used by the hydro-geologists: a methodological approach for the quantitative hydrogeological calibration of MRS measurements. In: 2nd International Workshop on the Magnetic Resonance Sounding Method Applied to Non-invasive Groundwater Investigations, Vol. 1, pp. 57–60. BRGM, Orleans.
8. Lachassagne P., Machard de Gramont H., Baltassat J.-M. and Legchenko A. 2003b. Etalonnage hydrogéologique de la méthode de prospection par Résonnance Magnétique Protonique. Cas des aquiferes sédimentaires. Rapport BRGM n° BRGM/RP-52248-FR.
9. Legchenko A. 2004. Magnetic Resonance Sounding: enhanced modeling of a phase shift. Applied Magnetic Resonance 25, 621–636.
10. Legchenko A., Baltassat J.-M., Beauce A. and Bernard J. 2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 21–46.
11. Legchenko A., Baltassat J.-M., Bobachev A., Martin C., Robain H. and Vouillamoz J.M. 2004. Magnetic Resonance Sounding applied to aquifer characterization. Ground Water 42, 363–373.
12. Legchenko A.V. and Shushakov O.A. 1998. Inversion of surface NMR data. Geophysics 63, 75–84.
13. Legchenko A. and Valla P. 2002. A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance soundings measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 3–19.
14. Lubczynski M. and Roy J. 2003. Hydrogeological interpretation and potential of the new magnetic resonance sounding (MRS) method. Journal of Hydrology 28, 319–340.
15. Lubczynski M. and Roy J. 2004. Magnetic resonance sounding (MRS): new method for groundwater assessment. Ground Water 42, 291–303.
16. de Marsily G. 1981. Quantitative Hydrogeology. Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers. Academic Press, Inc.
17. Plata J. and Rubio F. 2002. MRS experiments in a noisy area of detrital aquifer in the south of Spain. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 83–94.
18. Price M. 1993. Groundwater movement in the Chalk aquifer in England. Hydrogeologie 1993(2), 147–150.
19. Roy J. and Lubczynski M. 2003. The MRS technique and its use for groundwater investigations. Hydrogeology Journal 11, 455–465.
20. Roy, J. and Lubczynski M.W. 2000. The MRS technique for groundwater. In XXXIAH Congress on Groundwater: past achievements and future challenges (edited by T.M.t.f.g.r.e.-T.r.f.s.s.i.S. Africa), pp. 273–279. Sililo O. et al., Cape Town.
21. Schirov M., Legchenko A. and Creer G. 1991. New direct non-invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia. Exploration Geophysics 22, 333–338.
22. Sen P.N., Straley C., Kenyon W.E. and Whittingham M.S. 1990. Surface-to-volume ratio, charge density, nuclear magnetic relaxation and permeability in clay bearing sandstones. Geophysics 55, 61–69.
23. Timur A. 1968. An investigation of permeability, porosity, and residual water saturation relationship. Annual Logging Symposium Transactions: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Paper K.
24. Timur A. 1969a. Producible porosity and permeability of sandstones investigated through nuclear magnetic resonance principles. The Log Analyst, January-February, 3–11.
25. Timur A. 1969b. Pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance studies of porosity, moveable fluid, and permeability of sandstones. Journal of Petroleum Technology 21, 775–786.
26. Vouillamoz J.M. 2003. La caractérisation des aquifères par une méthode non-invasive: les sondages par résonance magnétique protonique. PhD Thesis, Université de Paris XI, Paris.
27. Vouillamoz J.M., Legchenko A., Albouy Y., Bakalowicz M., Baltassat J.-M. and Al-Fares W. 2003. Localization of saturated karst aquifer with magnetic resonance sounding and resistivity imagery. Ground Water 41, 578–587.
28. Weichman P.B., Lavely E.M. and Ritzwoller M.H. 2000. Theory of surface nuclear magnetic resonnance with applications to geophysical imaging problems. Physical Review E62(1), 1290–1312.
29. Wyns R., Baltassat J.M., Lachassagne P., Legchenko A. and Vairon J. 2004. Application of proton magnetic resonance soundings to ground-water reserves mapping in weathered basement rocks (Brittany, France). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 175(1), 21–34.
30. Yaramanci U., Lange G. and Hertrich M. 2002. Aquifer characterization using surface NMR jointly with other geophysical techniques at the Nauen/Berlin test site. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 47–65.