Leaf anatomical adaptations of Cenchrus ciliaris L. from the salt range, Pakistan against drought stress

Pakistan Journal of Botany

Volumn 38, Issue 5 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 1723-1730

  Nawazish, Shamyla ^a   Hameed, Mansoor ^a   Naurin, Shaista ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENCHRUS; CENCHRUS CILIARIS;

EID: 54449101296     PISSN: 05563321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abernethy, G. A., D. W. Fountain and M. T. McManus. 1998. Observations on the leaf anatomy of Festuca novae-zelandiae and biochemical responses to a water deficit. N Z J. Bot., 36 (1): 113-123.
2. Aguirre-Medina, J.F., Acosta Gallegos, J.A., Ruiz Posadas, L.del., Shibata, J.K., Trejo Lopez, C. 2002. Morphological differences on the leaf epidermis of common bean and their relationship to drought tolerance. Agricultura technical en mexico., 28(1): 53-64, 32.
3. Ali, M.A., Prodhan, A.K.M.A., Haque, M.A. 1999. Effect of water stress on the anatomical characters of root and stem of Maize plant. Indian J. Agric. Res, 33(4):245-253.
4. Alvarez, J.M, Rocha, J. P., Machado, S.R. 2003. Ultrastructural aspects of bulliform cells in two Cerrado Grass species. Acta Microscopia., :57-58.
5. Arriaga, L., A.E. Castellanos, E. Moreno, and J. Alarcocon. 2003. Potential ecological distribution of Alien invasive species and risk assessment: A case study of buffel grass in arid regions of Mexico. Conserv. Biol., 18:1504-1514.
6. Awasthi, L. P. and D.M. Maurya. 1993. Genetic variability in anatomical root traits of Indian upland rice with reference to drought resistance. Int. Rice Res. Notes, 18 (2): 14-21.
7. Balog-Nyakas, A. 1988. An anatomical study of the ear leaves of maize (Zea mays L.) at different rates of NPK application. Debreceni Agrártudományi Egyetem Tudományos Közlemé nyei, 27: 253-272
8. Boom, A., J.S. Sinninge Damsté and J.W. de Leeuw. 2005. Cutan, a common aliphatic biopolymer in cuticles of drought-adapted plants. Org. Geochem., 36 (4): 595-601.
9. Bosabalidis A.M. and G. Kofidis G. 2002. Comparative effects of drought stress on leaf anatomy of two olive cultivars. Plant Sci., 163: 375-379.
10. Burbank, D.W. and R.A. Beck. 1989. Early Pliocene uplift of the Salt Range: temporal constrains on thrust wedge development, Northwest Himalaya, Pakistan, in Malinconico, L. L., and R. Lillie, J. (eds.), Tectonics and Geophysics of the Western Himalaya: G. S. A. Special Paper 232,: 113-128.
11. Burnett, S.E., S.V. Pennisi, P.A. Thomas and M.W. Van Iersel. 2005. Controlled drought affects morphology and anatomy of Salvia splendens. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 130 (5):. 775-781.
12. Butler, R.W.H., M.P. Coward, G.M. Harwood and R.J. Knipe. 1987. Salt control on thrust geometry, structural style and gravitational collapse along the Himalayan Mountain Front in the Salt Range of Northern Pakistan. In Lerche, I., and O'Brian, J.J., eds. Dynamical Geology of Salt and Related Structures. Orlando, Academic Press, : 339-418.
13. Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. 2nd ed. New York, John Wiley and Sons. 351-353.
14. Hussain, S.S. 1994. Pakistan Manual of Plant Ecology. National Book Foundation, Islamabad.: 255.
15. Ilahi, I. 1982. Plant behaviour under water stress. Pak. J. Bot., 14: 40-47.
16. Moreno-Sotomayor, A., A. Weiss, E.T. Paparozzi, and T.J. Arkebauer. 2002. Stability of leaf anatomy and leaf anatomy and light response curves of field grown maize as a function of age and nitrogen status. J. Plant Physiol., 159(8): 819-826
17. Perez-Estrada, L.B., Z. Cano-Santana and K. Oyama. 2000. Variation in leaf trichomes of Wigandia urens: environmental factors and physiological consequences. Tree Physiol., 20(9):629-632.
18. Pitman, W. D., E. C. Holt, B. E. Conrad, and D. M. Vietor. 1980. Forage quality changes in klein grass with moisture stress. Agron. Abstr. 72nd annual meeting, American Soc. Agron., 127
19. Ristic, Z. and D.D. Cass, 1991. Leaf anatomy of Zea mays L. in response to water shortage and high temperature: a comparison of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive lines. Bot. Gaz., 152 (2): 173-185.
20. Sam, O., E. Jeréz, E., J. Dell'Amico and M.C. Ruiz-Sánchez. 2000. Water stress induced changes in anatomy of tomato leaf epidermis. Biol. Plant., 43 (2): 275-277.
21. ShiLei, G., Z. Sheng and W. Hong. 2002. Anatomical characters of stems and leaves of three lawn grasses. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot., 10 (2): 145-151.
22. Silva, H., J.P. Martinez, C. Baginsky and M. Pinto. 1999. Effect of water deficit on the leaf anatomy of six cultivars of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 72 (2): 219-235.
23. Tavakol, E. and H. Pakniyat. 2007. Evaluation of some drought resistance criteria at seedling stage in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.: 10: 1113-1117.
24. Thind, S. K. 1996. Effect of drought on leaf epidermal structure of sugarcane. 1: 15-17.
25. Vasellati, V., M. Oesterheld, D. Medan and J. Loreti. 2001. Effects of flooding and Drought on the anatomy of Paspalum dilatatum. Ann. Bot., 88:355-360.
26. Venora, G. and F. Calcagno, 1991. Influence of vascular system in Triticum durum Desf. on drought adaptation. Cereal Res. Commun., 19: 319-326.