Effects of mating disruption treatments on navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) sexual communication and damage in almonds and pistachios

Journal of Economic Entomology

Volumn 101, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1633-1642

  Higbee, Bradley S ^a   Burks, Charles S ^a,b  

^a Paramount Farming Company   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Almonds; Amyelois transitella; Mating disruption; Pistachios

Indexed keywords

SEX PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTH; PARASITOLOGY; PISTACHIO; PRUNUS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; MOTHS; PEST CONTROL, BIOLOGICAL; PISTACIA; PRUNUS; SEX ATTRACTANTS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

AMYELOIS; AMYELOIS TRANSITELLA; LEPIDOPTERA; PISTACIA VERA; PRUNUS DULCIS; PYRALIDAE; TETRAODONTIDAE;

EID: 54449099259     PISSN: 00220493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[1633:EOMDTO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andrews, K. L., M. M. Barnes, and S. A. Josserand. 1980. Dispersal and oviposition by the navel orangeworm. Environ. Entomol. 9: 525-529.
2. Agresti, A. 2007. An introduction to categorical data analysis, 2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
3. Bentley, W. J., W. J. Beede, K. M. Daane, T. J. Michailides, B. L. Teviotdale, and B. B. Westerdahl. 2003. UC IPM pest management guidelines: pistachio. Publication 3471. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA.
4. Burks, C. S., and D. G. Brandi. 2004. Seasonal abundance of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in figs and effect of peripheral aerosol dispensers on sexual communication. J. Insect Sci. 4: 40.
5. Cardé, R. T., and A. K. Minks. 1995. Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40: 559-585.
6. Coffelt, J. A., K. W. Vick, P. E. Sonnet, and R. E. Doolittle. 1979. Isolation, identification and synthesis of a female sex pheromone of the navel orangeworm, Amyebis transitella. J. Chem. Ecol. 5: 955-966.
7. Crane, J. C. 1978. Quality of pistachio nuts as affected by time of harvest. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103: 332-333.
8. Curtis, C. E. 1976. Economics of NOW control and implementing orchard cleanup. Almond Facts 41: 5-8.
9. Curtis, C. E., R. K. Curtis, and K. L. Andrews. 1984. Pro-gression of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) infestation and damage of almonds on the ground and on the tree during harvest. Environ. Entomol. 13: 146-149.
10. Curtis, C.E., P.J. Landolt, and J.D. Clark. 1985. Disruption of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) mating in large-scale plots with synthetic pheromone. J. Econ. Entomol. 78:1425-1430.
11. Gut, L. J., L. L. Stelinski, D. R. Thomson, and J. R, Miller. 2004. Behaviour-modifying chemicals: prospects and constraints in IPM, pp. 73-121. In O. Koul, G. S. Dhaliwal and G. W. Cuperus [eds.], Integrated pest management: potential, constraints and challenges. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
12. Kester, D.E. ,and R, Asay. 1975. Almonds, pp. 387-419. In J. Jam'ck and J. N. Moore [eds.], Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN.
13. Klonsky, K, P. Livingston, R. H. Beede, M. W. Freeman, L. Hendricks, B. Holtz, C. Kallsen, S. Sibbett, and L. er-guson. 1998. Sample costs for establishing a pistachio orchard and producing pistachios. Acta Hortic. 470: 481-492.
14. Kovanci, O. B., C. Schal, J. F. Walgenbach, and C. C. Kennedy. 2005. Comparison of mating disruption with pesticides for management of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera Tortricidae) in North Carolina apple orchards. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 1248-1258.
15. Landolt, P. J., and C. E. Curtis. 1982. Effects of temperature on the circadian rhythm of navel orangeworm sexual activity. Environ. Entomol. 11: 107-110.
16. Leal, W. S., A.-L. Parra-Pedrazzoli, K.-E. Kaissling, T. I. Morgan, F. G. Zalom, D. J. Pesak, E. A. Dundulis, C. S. Burks,and B. S. Higbee. 2005. Unusual pheromone chemistry in the navel orangeworm: novel sex attractants and a behavioral antagonist. Naturwissenschaften 92:139-146.
17. Mayer, M.S., and E.R. Mitchell. 1998. Rapid measure of sex pheromone emission from plastic rope dispensers: example of utility in sexual communication disruption of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Phytoparasitica 26: 117-125.
18. Sarfraz, R. M., M. L. Evenden, B. A. Keddie, and L. M. Dosdall. 2006. Pheromone-mediated mating disruption: a powerful tool in insect management. Outlooks Pest Manag. 17: 36-45.
19. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 user's guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
20. Shorey, H. H., and R. G. Gerber. 1996. Use of puffers for disruption of sex pheromone communication among navel orangeworm moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in almonds, pistachios, and walnuts. Environ. Entomol. 25: 1154-1157.
21. Shorey, H. H, C. B. Sisk, and R. G. Gerber. 1996. Widely separated pheromone release sites for disruption of sex pheromone communication in two species of Lepidoptera. Environ. Entomol. 25: 446-451.
22. Soderstrom, E. L. 1977. Seal of almond shells and resistance to navel orangeworm. J. Econ. Entomol 70: 467-468.
23. Tebbets, J. S., C. E. Curtis, and R. D. Fries. 1978. Mortality of immature stages of the navel orangeworm stored at 3.5°C. J. Econ. Entomol. 71: 875-876.
24. Wade, W. H. 1961. Biology of the navel orangeworm, Paramyelois transitella (Walker), on almonds and walnuts in northern California. Hilgardia 31: 129-171.
25. Zalom, F. G., C. Pickel, W. J. Bentley, R. L. Coviello, R. A. Van Steenwyck, M. W. Freeman, W. D. Bubler, J. E. Adaskaveg, R. Duncan, J. J. Stapleton, et al. 2005. UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Almond. Publication 3431. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA.
26. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, 4th ed. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.