Parentage identification using single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes: Application to product tracing

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 86, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2508-2517

  Hill, W G ^a   Salisbury, B A ^b   Webb, A J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b Clinical Data Inc   (United States)

^c Maple Leaf Foods Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

Genetic marker; Genotyping error; Parentage identification; Pig; Product tracing; Single nucleotide polymorphism

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MUTATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SWINE;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

EID: 54449097390     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0276     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bieber, F. R., C. H. Brenner, and D. Lazer. 2006. Finding criminals through DNA of their relatives. Science 312:1315-1316.
2. Brenner, C. H. 1999. The power of SNP's - Even without population data. http://dna-view.com/SNPpost.htm Accessed June 22, 2006.
3. Brenner, C. H., and B. S. Weir. 2003. Issues and strategies in the DNA identification of World Trade Center victims. Theor. Popul. Biol. 63:173-178.
4. Dodds, K. G., M. L. Tate, J. C. McEwan, and A. M. Crawford. 1996. Exclusion probabilities for pedigree testing farm animals. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:966-975.
5. Double, M. C., A. Cockburn, S. C. Barry, and P. E. Smouse. 1997. Exclusion probabilities for single-locus paternity analysis when related males compete for matings. Mol. Ecol. 6:1155-1166.
6. Gill, P. 2001. An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensic purposes. Int. J. Legal Med. 114:204-210.
7. Hayes, B., A. K. Sonneson, and B. Gjerde. 2005. Evaluation of three strategies using DNA markers for traceability in aquaculture species. Aquaculture 250:70-81.
8. Heaton, M. P., G. P. Harhay, G. L. Bennett, R. T. Stone, W. M. Grosse, E. Casas, J. W. Keele, T. P. L. Smith, C. G. Chitko-McKown, and W. W. Laegreid. 2002. Selection and use of SNP markers for animal identification and paternity analysis in U.S. beef cattle. Mamm. Genome 13:272-281.
9. Kalinowski, S. T., M. W. Taper, and T. C. Marshall. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16:1099-1106.
10. Kuruvilla, F., T. Green, D. Altshuler, M. Daly, and S. Gabriel. 2006. An evaluation of the Bayesian robust linear modelling using Mahalanobis distance (BRLMM) genotyping algorithm, http://www.broad.mit.edu/gen_analysis/genotyping/ brlmm_affy_ncrr. html Accessed Nov. 25, 2007.
11. Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. B. Kruuk, and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7:639-655.
12. Plastow, G. S., A. J. Mileham, T. Wilken, C. Gladney, and J. Bastiaansen. 2007. Pig Improvement Company (UK) Ltd., assignee. System for tracing animal products. US patent 7229764.
13. Sobel, E., J. C. Papp, and K. Lange. 2002. Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70:496-508.
14. Thompson, E. A. 1975. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann. Hum. Genet. 39:173-188.
15. Vignal, A., D. Milan, M. SanCristobal, and A. Eggen. 2002. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genet. Sel. Evol. 34:275-305.
16. Weir, B. S. 1996. Genetic data analysis. II. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
17. Weir, B. S., A. D. Anderson, and A. B. Hepler. 2006. Genetic relatedness analysis: Modern data and new challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:771-780.