-
1
-
-
0026877917
-
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection
-
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-481.
-
(1992)
Med Care
, vol.30
, pp. 473-481
-
-
Ware, J.E.1
Sherbourne, C.D.2
-
2
-
-
0000084631
-
The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial
-
Gohagan JK. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:249S.
-
(2000)
Control Clin Trials
, vol.21
-
-
Gohagan, J.K.1
-
3
-
-
33244481503
-
-
Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute
-
Reis LAG, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2000. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 2003. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/CSR/1975_2000/index.html.
-
(2003)
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2000
-
-
Reis, L.A.G.1
Kosary, C.L.2
Hankey, B.F.3
-
4
-
-
5444267115
-
-
eds. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute
-
Miller BA, Kolonel LN, Bernstein L, Young JL Jr, Swanson GM, West D, et al, eds. In: United States Racial/Ethnic Cancer Patterns in the US, 1988-1992. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/ publications/ethnicity/citation.html.
-
United States Racial/Ethnic Cancer Patterns in the US, 1988-1992
-
-
Miller, B.A.1
Kolonel, L.N.2
Bernstein, L.3
Young Jr., J.L.4
Swanson, G.M.5
West, D.6
-
5
-
-
0034572611
-
The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: History, organization, and status
-
Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:2515-2725.
-
(2000)
Control Clin Trials
, vol.21
, pp. 2515-2725
-
-
Gohagan, J.K.1
Prorok, P.C.2
Hayes, R.B.3
Kramer, B.S.4
-
6
-
-
0030832906
-
Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening
-
Domonitz JA, Provenzale D. Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:2171-2178.
-
(1997)
Am J Gastroenterol
, vol.92
, pp. 2171-2178
-
-
Domonitz, J.A.1
Provenzale, D.2
-
7
-
-
0030759883
-
Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening
-
Leard LE, Savides TJ, Ganiats TG. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:211-218.
-
(1997)
J Fam Pract
, vol.45
, pp. 211-218
-
-
Leard, L.E.1
Savides, T.J.2
Ganiats, T.G.3
-
8
-
-
0033966771
-
Colorectal cancer screening beliefs
-
Rawl SM, Menon U, Champion VL, Foster JL, Skinner CS. Colorectal cancer screening beliefs. Cancer Pract. 2000;8:32-37.
-
(2000)
Cancer Pract
, vol.8
, pp. 32-37
-
-
Rawl, S.M.1
Menon, U.2
Champion, V.L.3
Foster, J.L.4
Skinner, C.S.5
-
9
-
-
0030866759
-
Decisions about prostate cancer screening in managed care
-
Kaplan RM. Decisions about prostate cancer screening in managed care. Curr Opin Oncol. 1997;9:480-486.
-
(1997)
Curr Opin Oncol
, vol.9
, pp. 480-486
-
-
Kaplan, R.M.1
-
11
-
-
0019827980
-
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure
-
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19:787-805.
-
(1981)
Med Care
, vol.19
, pp. 787-805
-
-
Bergner, M.1
Bobbitt, R.A.2
Carter, W.B.3
Gilson, B.S.4
-
12
-
-
0003068836
-
The EuroQOL instrument: An index of health-related quality of life
-
Spilker B, ed. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven;
-
Kind P. The EuroQOL instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:191-196.
-
(1996)
Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd Ed.
, pp. 191-196
-
-
Kind, P.1
-
13
-
-
0031939048
-
Can raters consistently evaluate the content of focus groups?
-
Weinberger M, Ferguson JA, Westmoreland G, et al. Can raters consistently evaluate the content of focus groups? Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:929-993.
-
(1998)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.46
, pp. 929-993
-
-
Weinberger, M.1
Ferguson, J.A.2
Westmoreland, G.3
|