메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 347-352

False-positive cancer screens and health-related quality of life

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Focus groups; Prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer; Quality of life; Secondary prevention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY TEST; LUNG CANCER; MALE; NURSE; ONCOLOGY; OVARY CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 5444272993     PISSN: 0162220X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200409000-00003     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (31)

References (13)
  • 1
    • 0026877917 scopus 로고
    • The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection
    • Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-481.
    • (1992) Med Care , vol.30 , pp. 473-481
    • Ware, J.E.1    Sherbourne, C.D.2
  • 2
    • 0000084631 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial
    • Gohagan JK. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:249S.
    • (2000) Control Clin Trials , vol.21
    • Gohagan, J.K.1
  • 5
    • 0034572611 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: History, organization, and status
    • Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:2515-2725.
    • (2000) Control Clin Trials , vol.21 , pp. 2515-2725
    • Gohagan, J.K.1    Prorok, P.C.2    Hayes, R.B.3    Kramer, B.S.4
  • 6
    • 0030832906 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening
    • Domonitz JA, Provenzale D. Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:2171-2178.
    • (1997) Am J Gastroenterol , vol.92 , pp. 2171-2178
    • Domonitz, J.A.1    Provenzale, D.2
  • 7
    • 0030759883 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening
    • Leard LE, Savides TJ, Ganiats TG. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:211-218.
    • (1997) J Fam Pract , vol.45 , pp. 211-218
    • Leard, L.E.1    Savides, T.J.2    Ganiats, T.G.3
  • 9
    • 0030866759 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decisions about prostate cancer screening in managed care
    • Kaplan RM. Decisions about prostate cancer screening in managed care. Curr Opin Oncol. 1997;9:480-486.
    • (1997) Curr Opin Oncol , vol.9 , pp. 480-486
    • Kaplan, R.M.1
  • 11
    • 0019827980 scopus 로고
    • The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure
    • Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19:787-805.
    • (1981) Med Care , vol.19 , pp. 787-805
    • Bergner, M.1    Bobbitt, R.A.2    Carter, W.B.3    Gilson, B.S.4
  • 12
    • 0003068836 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The EuroQOL instrument: An index of health-related quality of life
    • Spilker B, ed. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven;
    • Kind P. The EuroQOL instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:191-196.
    • (1996) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd Ed. , pp. 191-196
    • Kind, P.1
  • 13
    • 0031939048 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Can raters consistently evaluate the content of focus groups?
    • Weinberger M, Ferguson JA, Westmoreland G, et al. Can raters consistently evaluate the content of focus groups? Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:929-993.
    • (1998) Soc Sci Med , vol.46 , pp. 929-993
    • Weinberger, M.1    Ferguson, J.A.2    Westmoreland, G.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.