Continuous quality measurement: Restructuring assessment for a new technological and organizational environment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 391-401

  Welsh, John F ^a   Alexander, Suraj ^b   Dey, Sukhen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^b University of Louisville   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5444272232     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930120081970     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alstete, J. (1995) Benchmarking in Higher Education: adapting best practices to improve quality. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5 (Washington DC, The George Washington University).
2. Astin, A. (1993) Assessment for Excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education (Phoenix, Arizona, Oryx Press).
3. Banta, T. (1997) Moving assessment forward: enabling conditions and stumbling blocks, in: D. Gray & T. Banta The Campus-Level Impact of Assessment: progress, problems and possibilities, New Directions for Higher Education, No. 100 (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
4. Camp, R. C. (1989) Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance (Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Quality Press).
5. Chaffee, E. E. & Scherr, L. (1992) Quality: Transforming Postsecondary Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 3. Association for the Study of Higher Education: Washington, D.C.
6. Cornesky, R. & McCool, S. (1992) Implementing Total Quality Management in Higher Education (Madison, Wisconsin, Magna Publications).
7. Freed, J. E. & Klugman, M. (1997) Quality Principles and Practices in Higher Education: different questions for different times (Phoenix, Arizona, Oryx Press).
8. Freed, J. E., Klugman, M. & Fife, J. D. (1997) A Culture for Academic Excellence: implementing the quality principles in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1 (Washington DC, George Washington University).
9. Gray, P. & Banta, T. (1997) The Campus-Level Impact of Assessment: progress, problems and possibilities. New Directions for Higher Education, No. 100 (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
10. Kinlaw, D. C. (1992) Continuous Improvement and Measurement for Total Quality (San Diego, Pfeiffer and Company).
11. Lewis, R. & Smith, D. (1994), Total Quality in Higher Education (Delray Beach, Florida, St Lucie Press).
12. Lucas, C. (1996) Crisis in the Academy: Rethinking higher education in America (New York, St Martins).
13. Palomba, C. & Banta, T. (1999) Assessment Essentials: planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
14. Rowley, D. J., Lujan, H. D. & Dolence, M. G. (1997) Strategic Change in Colleges and Universities: planning to survive and prosper (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
15. Scherr, L. & Teeter, D. J. (Eds) (1991) Total Quality Management in Higher Education. New Directions for Higher Education, No. 71 (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
16. Seymour, D. (1991) TQM on campus: what the pioneers are finding, American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, November, pp. 2-6.
17. Seymour, D. (1993) On Q: causing quality in higher education (Phoenix, Arizona, Oryx Press).
18. Seymour, D. (1993) TQM: focus on performance, not resources, Educational Researcher, 74(2), pp. 6-14.
19. Tierney, W. (1999) Building the Responsive Campus: creating high performance colleges and universities (Thousand Oaks, California, Sage Publications).
20. Wolverton, M. (1994) A New Alliance: Continuous Quality and Classroom Effectiveness. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6 (Washington DC, The George Washington University).