The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 585-589

  Baharav, Haim ^a   Kupershmidt, Irit ^a   Laufer, Ben Zion ^b   Cardash, Harold S ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHER; POLYSULFIDE; POLYVINYL SILOXANE; SILOXANE; SULFIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; GINGIVA; LINEAR SYSTEM; MACHINE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPE; PREDICTION; SIMULATION; STONE ANALYSIS; TOOTH; TOOTH ROOT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYVINYLS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SILOXANES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SULFIDES; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC;

EID: 5444271604     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Laufer BZ, Baharav H, Ganor Y, Cardash HS. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:466-471.
2. Chai J, Takahashi Y, Lautenschlager EP. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:219-223.
3. Craig RG, Urquiola NJ, Liu CC. Comparison of commercial elastomeric impression materials. Oper Dent 1990;15:94-104.
4. Sneed WD, Miller R, Olson J. Tear strength often elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:511-513.
5. Tam LE, Brown JW. The tear resistance of various impression materials with and without modifiers. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63: 282-285.
6. Johnson GH, Craig RG. Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:197-203.
7. Hung SH, Purk JH, Tira DE, Eick JD. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:583-589.
8. Idris B, Houston F, Claffey N. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74: 535-541.
9. Nissan J, Laufer BZ, Brosh T, Assif D. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:161-165.
10. Council on Dental Materials and Devices, American Dental Association. Revised American Dental Association specification No. 19 for nonaqueous, elastomeric dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;94:733-741.
11. Hondrum SO. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:517-521.
12. Chan DC, Blackman R, Kaiser DA, Chung K. The effect of sprue design on the marginal accuracy of titanium castings. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:424-429.
13. Petteno D, Schierano G, Bassi F, Bresciano ME, Caossa S. Comparison of marginal fit of 3 different metal-ceramic systems: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:405-408.
14. Besimo C, Jeger C, Guggenheim R. Marginal adaptation of titanium frameworks produced by CAD/CAM techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:541-546.
15. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305.
16. Matty FA, Tjan AHL, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:527-531.
17. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina- and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-374.
18. Laufer BZ, Baharav H, Cardash HS. The linear accuracy of impressions and stone dies as affected by the thickness of the impression margin. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:247-252.