Faculty study groups: Solving "good problems" through study, reflection, and collaboration

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 247-263

  Wildman, Terry M ^a,b   Hable, Margaret P ^c   Preston, Marlene M ^a,b,c   Magliaro, Susan G ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Teaching and Learning ^*

^c Center for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5444269857     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/b:ihie.0000047413.00693.8c     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Austin, A. E., & Baldwin, R. G. (1991). Faculty collaboration: Enhancing the quality of scholarship and teaching. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, Report No. 7. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
2. Blumenthal, P. (1977, August). A faculty self-study group approach to improving instruction quality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
3. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Clift, R. T., Houston, W. R., & Pugach, M. C. (Eds.) (1990). Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
8. Cramer, G., Hurst, B., & Wilson, C. (1996). Teacher study groups for professional development. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
9. Gudmundsdottir, S. (1996). The teller, the tale, and the one being told: The narrative nature of the research interview. Curriculum Inquiry, 26, 292-306.
10. Harper, V. (1996). Establishing a community of conversation: Creating a context for selfreflection among teacher scholars. In L. Richlin & D. DeZure (Eds.), To improve the academy (Vol. 15) (pp. 251-266).
11. Harste, J. (1989). New policy guidelines for reading: Connecting research and practice. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
12. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (1995). Taking teaching seriously: Meeting the challenge of instructional improvement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, Report Two. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
16. Sanacore, J. (1993). Using study groups to create a professional community. Journal of Reading, 37(1), 62-66.
17. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think inaction. New York: Basic Books.
18. Slotnick, H. B. (1984, January). The Fargo Study Group: Faculty helping themselves to improve their instructional abilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association.
19. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.